LeafByNiggle
Well-known member
To say that these issues are “on the ballot” through the candidates mentioned implies that these are the issues on which these candidates will spend the bulk of their time and effort. That, I think, is an unwarranted assumption. While Clinton was in favor of abortion rights, it was not the biggest part of her efforts. How much a difference did she make in abortion policy? Similarly, one can ask how much a difference Trump has made, or is likely to make, in abortion policy. It may be too soon to tell, but so far all we have is Neil Gorsuch, who has not yet made any difference in abortion policy, we don’t know if he ever will.I can’t refute this with certainty, but I’m sure we are all not that naïve when it comes to what’s on the ballot. There is a margin or error involved due to deception and dishonest politics, but when it comes to Clinton and the Democrats, to think abortion, euthanasia and same sex marriage (all non negotiable as Catholics) are not on the ballot is very, very naïve IMO.
Like I said, I suspect they are really not voting for the lesser of two evils when Catholics vote for someone like Clinton or the Democrats, can’t prove it though and only they themselves know, I can be fooled, but God can’t.
God Bless
Thank you for reading
By ignoring the likely effect of electing various candidates and focusing only on their nominal positions on selected issues gives a distorted view of what voting for those candidates really supports.
Last edited: