Can NCC's be heretics and seperated brethren at the same time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ALLFORHIM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So then what you are saying is that by me believing in what the bible teaches I have rejected orthodox teaching? Even though I have accepted the Lord as my Savior and do my best to follow His commands?
Ya gotta put on orthodox goggles. We would say that because you reject orthodox teaching, you cannot possibly believe “what the Bible ‘teaches’” because it is the Apostolic Church that teaches (Mt. 28:20), not Scripture per se. The Church wrote the New Testament, the New Testament did not create the Church.
Thanks for your answers:D
I dunno. For me, the :newidea: moment came when a Greek Orthodox friend of mine casually mentioned that it was the Church that gave us the Bible. That was so clearly inarguable that it kicked off the whole cascade that culminated (many years later) in my crossing the Tiber. You can’t be a “Bible Christian” and NOT be Catholic.
 
Catechism of the Catholic Church 2089:
Incredulity is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it.
"Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same;
apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith;
schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him."[sup]*[/sup]
  • CIC, can. 751
Ut unum sint - On commitment to Ecumenism (Pope John Paul II 25 May 1995)
 
LOL ----Im not smart enough to bait anyone. I guess it came across that way but that was not my intention:o Your probably right about the can of worms too but again not my intention. I just really want to know what the CC would say about me:thumbsup:
Thank you:D

Could you just clarify which staement that was and where I was inconsistent. Im not a debator apologist type and my writing is my weakest area so I probably dont see where Im beeing inconsistent. But I do believe you when you say I was:o Thanks:D
I’m not much of a communicator myself. What I was TRYING to say was that I could NOT call you inconsistant!
 
We on CAF know that you are a woman of good will, who loves Jesus Christ and that you are a genuine seeker of truth. Frankly, if you believe that you are privy to all the truth of the Christian faith, why on earth would you CARE how the Catholic Church “thinks” of you?

To be honest it is not that I care so much as I want to know exactly where the CC stands on this issue with someone like me.😉 I am strong and non-wavering in my faith and know I am a child of God. I just like to get both sides of the story:thumbsup:
 
Ya gotta put on orthodox goggles. We would say that because you reject orthodox teaching, you cannot possibly believe “what the Bible ‘teaches’” because it is the Apostolic Church that teaches (Mt. 28:20), not Scripture per se. The Church wrote the New Testament, the New Testament did not create the Church.

I dunno. For me, the :newidea: moment came when a Greek Orthodox friend of mine casually mentioned that it was the Church that gave us the Bible. That was so clearly inarguable that it kicked off the whole cascade that culminated (many years later) in my crossing the Tiber. You can’t be a “Bible Christian” and NOT be Catholic.
Yes I guess that is what you would see if you put orthodox goggles on.😃
I would submit to you this–Why do we need goggles? I can see God’s word just fine without them:thumbsup:

The statements you make here are for a different thread though and Im not interested in debating much anymore.

Besides these topics you raised have been talked to death anyway. You know what I mean?😉
 
Yes I guess that is what you would see if you put orthodox goggles on.😃
I would submit to you this–Why do we need goggles? I can see God’s word just fine without them:thumbsup:
You cannot really know that can you? Not being contentious here. You know I’m not a sniper.
 
You cannot really know that can you? Not being contentious here. You know I’m not a sniper.
I agree. You can be the best meaning person in the world, but with no one to guide you, you can be spiritually crippled.
 
You cannot really know that can you? Not being contentious here. You know I’m not a sniper.
LOL I know.😉 I guess I just put all my trust in what the bible says about the Holy Spirit guiding me:shrug: I stand on that by faith. I havent been disappointed:thumbsup:

I know catholics feel they need the Pope to guide them and I get that, just dont agree he is the only one with authority is all.😉 But you knew I would say that 😛 😃

Thanks for the responses:thumbsup:
 
LOL I know.😉 I guess I just put all my trust in what the bible says about the Holy Spirit guiding me
If you look at that promise, it is not “the Bible” but Jesus who says the Holy Spirit will guide “you.” But He is specifically addressing the Eleven. Catholics are definitely guided by the Holy Spirit “into all the truth.” But when we are guided someplace other than where the Apostles are, we know we have stepped outside of Christ’s will and promise.
🤷 I stand on that by faith. I havent been disappointed:thumbsup:
Not quite the issue here, is it?
I know catholics feel they need the Pope to guide them and I get that, just dont agree he is the only one with authority is all.😉 But you knew I would say that 😛 😃
Would it be correct to say that you do not believe that ANYBODY has authority over how you understand the faith? The way you frame your reliance on Scripture and the Holy Spirit, you seem to be a team of two.

The ancient Apostolic Churches look at this as more of a family matter. Handing on the faith “delivered once for all to the saints” is part of our fellowship with all the Christians who ever lived. With us, it is both mystical AND tangible.

Would you agree that the JW who sees in the “plain sense of Scripture” that Jesus is not God is being guided by the Holy Spirit? He would argue that he is.

In the end, the whole proposition of how the Gospel is propagated, received, and tested comes down to the matter of authority. We live in a country where authority is a dirty word. But Paul warns us not to accept a “different gospel.”
 
If you look at that promise, it is not “the Bible” but Jesus who says the Holy Spirit will guide “you.” But He is specifically addressing the Eleven. Catholics are definitely guided by the Holy Spirit “into all the truth.” But when we are guided someplace other than where the Apostles are, we know we have stepped outside of Christ’s will and promise
. I do believe that promise was also made to those who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God and His work on the cross. The bible doesnt say it excludes anybody from being indwelled with the Holy Spirit(except of course, those who do not believe) So, I also do not exlude anyone from being able to accept the Lord as their Savior and being indwelled by the Holy and thus being led into truth by the Spirit.👍 The CC does seem to exclude people.😦 Your statement above shows that.
Would it be correct to say that you do not believe that ANYBODY has authority over how you understand the faith? The way you frame your reliance on Scripture and the Holy Spirit, you seem to be a team of two.
Well in the sense when I stand in front of Christ on judgement day it will be me and Him alone. But, no I do listen to my mnisters. They help me quite a bit if I have a question. The difference is they do not claim to be infallible and that I HAVE to believe whatever they say.🤷 I also ask questions among my fellow christians. I attend a ladies bible study every week.😃 I love it!! I do accept that my minister knows more then I do about biblical principles and I accept his authority over me if I sin and will not repent and he has to use church discipline on me. So, I do not stand alone in my christian walk. Besides that would be boring and Im a social person.👍
The ancient Apostolic Churches look at this as more of a family matter. Handing on the faith “delivered once for all to the saints” is part of our fellowship with all the Christians who ever lived. With us, it is both mystical AND tangible.
Yes and I believe the saints to be all believers in Christ and that includes you and me.👍
Would you agree that the JW who sees in the “plain sense of Scripture” that Jesus is not God is being guided by the Holy Spirit? He would argue that he is.
Actually, I believe it is pretty plain in scripture and that the JW believe otherwise because they are putting all their trust in their religion heirarchy. Plus I believe they have a different bible.😦
In the end, the whole proposition of how the Gospel is propagated, received, and tested comes down to the matter of authority. We live in a country where authority is a dirty word. But Paul warns us not to accept a "different gospel."QUOTE]Im sorry I have to go and cant answer this properly. Bye
 
. I do believe that promise was also made to those who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God and His work on the cross. The bible doesnt say it excludes anybody from being indwelled with the Holy Spirit(except of course, those who do not believe) So, I also do not exlude anyone from being able to accept the Lord as their Savior and being indwelled by the Holy and thus being led into truth by the Spirit.👍 The CC does seem to exclude people.😦 Your statement above shows that.

Well in the sense when I stand in front of Christ on judgement day it will be me and Him alone. But, no I do listen to my mnisters. They help me quite a bit if I have a question. The difference is they do not claim to be infallible and that I HAVE to believe whatever they say.🤷 I also ask questions among my fellow christians. I attend a ladies bible study every week.😃 I love it!! I do accept that my minister knows more then I do about biblical principles and I accept his authority over me if I sin and will not repent and he has to use church discipline on me. So, I do not stand alone in my christian walk. Besides that would be boring and Im a social person.👍

Yes and I believe the saints to be all believers in Christ and that includes you and me.👍

Actually, I believe it is pretty plain in scripture and that the JW believe otherwise because they are putting all their trust in their religion heirarchy. Plus I believe they have a different bible.😦

In the end, the whole proposition of how the Gospel is propagated, received, and tested comes down to the matter of authority. We live in a country where authority is a dirty word. But Paul warns us not to accept a "different gospel."QUOTE]Im sorry I have to go and cant answer this properly. Bye
The Catholic Church doesn’t exclude people at all: They exclude themselves. It’s a common misconception that Protestants make. We believe any sin is forgivable, except for not believing in God. And those people exclude themselves. I don’t think it’s necessarily that we believe that the Pope has all the answers, but rather that all the answers he gives are moral and for the betterment of the world and the creatures who inhabit it. Besides, who do you think WROTE and compiled books in the Bible, hmmm?
 
But, no I do listen to my mnisters. They help me quite a bit if I have a question.
Here are some questions (which I got from By What Authority? A Challenge to Protestant Pastors, which I’m sure you will find to be thought-provoking):

By what authority do your ministers claim their office? By succession? If so, can they demonstrate that they were called by a superior authority (who himself had a legitimate claim to his office)? By extraordinary calling? If so, can they show the required signs and wonders that authenticate their ministry?

And for you:

Are you certain that the one who shepherds your soul is a legitimate leader? Or are you following a self-appointed shepherd who is in rebellion against God’s appointed authorities?
 
The Catholic Church doesn’t exclude people at all: They exclude themselves. It’s a common misconception that Protestants make. We believe any sin is forgivable, except for not believing in God. And those people exclude themselves. I don’t think it’s necessarily that we believe that the Pope has all the answers, but rather that all the answers he gives are moral and for the betterment of the world and the creatures who inhabit it. Besides, who do you think WROTE and compiled books in the Bible, hmmm?
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.😃 I do not believe the CC wrote the bible at all. I believe 40 men who were inspired by God on what to write wrote the bible. That does not make them catholic at all. As far as compiling them–well I believe they discovered (through the guiding of the HS, the books which God wanted to be in the bible. The NT letters were scripture long before they were compiled into what we know as the bible.😉
 
Here are some questions (which I got from By What Authority? A Challenge to Protestant Pastors, which I’m sure you will find to be thought-provoking):
Thank you for the reference
By what authority do your ministers claim their office? By succession? If so, can they demonstrate that they were called by a superior authority (who himself had a legitimate claim to his office)? By extraordinary calling? If so, can they show the required signs and wonders that authenticate their ministry?
The same way every other christian can by God. God called us to stand out in the world. Some He called to be ministers/priests etc. I was not called to be a leader in the church(as far as being a minister anyway) Besides Im a woman;) My minister doesnt need a legitimate claim to an office. He has been led by God, sealed with the Holy Spirit and given the gift of preaching. Besides the bible doesnt teach that a person has to be part of apostolic succession to be able to teach the gospel message of Christ.🤷
And for you:
Are you certain that the one who shepherds your soul is a legitimate leader? Or are you following a self-appointed shepherd who is in rebellion against God’s appointed authorities?
I do believe I am following(so to speak) a Godly man who was called by God into the ministry. How do I know–by his fruit. When he is not sure of what exactly scripture is teaching(or if he knows there are several interpretations) he admits it. We are taught(as the bereans)to search the scriptures(with the help of the Holy Spirit) and to see if our minister is teaching truth.
Honestly, I believe my minister is wrong on some issues. But the issues are not relevant to my salvation so it doesnt bother me. I am allowed to believe opposite of him and ya know what it is still ok. It will not make or break my salvation or relationship with God. AMEN!!!
 
Hi ALL,

I appreciate your efforts in trying to teach me catholic ways. I would appreciate it if we could stay on topic please.👍

The other side issues that were brought(which I briefly answered) are issues that are talked to death already on the forums. Im not really interested in debating or discussing them. It is pointless for me because Im not really open to the ideas(Im being perfectly honest here) and if you are honest-you are not open to my beliefs either. Si it would turn into a circular argument that I am no longer interested in having with people.

I hope you understand.😃 Im sure you do if you have been around long enough;)

God Bless
 
How can I be a seperated brethren of yours and be heretical at the same time?:confused:

Maybe I just dont see the difference between the two:shrug:

I am a believer in Christ and follow His ways to the best of my ability. On the flip side–I do not believe in most catholic theology-

Sooo–what exactly am I —a heretic or seperated brethren?:confused: :confused:

Thanks:D
Part of the problem I’ve noticed is that when non-Catholic Christians hear the word “heretic” they automatically assume it means “hopelessly darned to eternal Heck!” but that’s not really what it means. A heretic is a person who holds religious beliefs in conflict with the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church. That does NOT mean that you are not a Christian, just that some of your beliefs don’t match those of the Catholic Church - which is hardly news to you. 😉

I would say that you DO believe *most *of Catholic dogma, but there are some things with which you disagree. I became Catholic last August, coming from an I/F Baptist background, and like you, I preferred just to be called a ‘Christian’. My husband and 3 kids just entered the Church at Easter. My husband said, and I agree, that we didn’t have to really change any of our “core” beliefs about the nature of God, what Jesus did for us, and the Bible, because they are exactly the same as we’ve always believed as long as we’ve been Christians. You’d be hard-pressed to find a theological point that all Christians (of whatever stripe) agree on that doesn’t also agree with Catholic dogma. We’re more alike than some Christians care to admit. 👍
 
Part of the problem I’ve noticed is that when non-Catholic Christians hear the word “heretic” they automatically assume it means “hopelessly darned to eternal Heck!” but that’s not really what it means. A heretic is a person who holds religious beliefs in conflict with the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church. That does NOT mean that you are not a Christian, just that some of your beliefs don’t match those of the Catholic Church - which is hardly news to you. 😉

I would say that you DO believe *most *of Catholic dogma, but there are some things with which you disagree. I became Catholic last August, coming from an I/F Baptist background, and like you, I preferred just to be called a ‘Christian’. My husband and 3 kids just entered the Church at Easter. My husband said, and I agree, that we didn’t have to really change any of our “core” beliefs about the nature of God, what Jesus did for us, and the Bible, because they are exactly the same as we’ve always believed as long as we’ve been Christians. You’d be hard-pressed to find a theological point that all Christians (of whatever stripe) agree on that doesn’t also agree with Catholic dogma. We’re more alike than some Christians care to admit. 👍
Thank you so much for this response.👍
 
My minister doesnt need a legitimate claim to an office. … Besides the bible doesnt teach that a person has to be part of apostolic succession to be able to teach the gospel message of Christ.
Actually, he does … and it does – which of course brings us right to the heart of the “heretics and seperated brethren at the same time” question.

As you will see from reading the article at the link I referenced earlier (I’m guessing you haven’t yet, judging from your response), you will see that the Bible teaches the following:

the “episkopoi” of the church at Ephesus have guardianship over “the flock” of God’s people.

to be a “pastor” (shepherd, overseer, elder) is also to be an “ambassador” for Christ (c.f. 2 Cor. 5:18ff).

“And one does not take the honor upon himself, but he is called by God, just as Aaron was.” (Heb. 5:4)

The dictionary defines the word “ambassador” to mean, an “authorized messenger or representative” - thus, an ambassador must be sent. In fact, the word “apostle” is Greek for “sent one.” To this we can add the words of St. Paul, who says that preachers must be “sent.” (Rom. 10:15)

Now, what does “to be sent” mean, except that someone in authority over you has conferred the privilege and authority upon you?

“…these very works which I am doing, bear me witness that the Father has sent me.” (John 5:36)

“…As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.” (John 20:21)

Scripture shows that only the Apostles are “entrusted” with the care of the Gospel message

Scripture also shows that only the Apostles refer to the Gospel message as their own personal possession. The Apostles possess the Gospel message precisely because it was “entrusted” to them, i.e., given to them, and not taken by them on their own initiative.

The question we must ask now is this: after the original 12 Apostles, how is this Gospel and apostolic authority passed on? Is it passed on at all? After the death of the last Apostle, can any individual who feels “called” by God simply take up the mission and message and carry on where the Apostles left off? The answer to this question is plainly “no,” as we have already begun to see from Scripture. The mission and the message can only be passed on by someone who first possessed it.

The first generation of Apostles takes care to not only pass along the message, but also creates new pastors with apostolic authority to continue transmitting the message

the Scriptures are a tool for “teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,” but who is to use this tool for these purposes? That is, who has the authority to teach, reproof, correct, and train others in righteousness? The “man of God” has this authority. But, who is the “man of God?” Your minister may wish to claim this title for himself as well, but a short survey of Scripture’s use of the title will reveal that this, too, is a privileged title that cannot be simply taken upon oneself

Contrary to the opinion that the “man of God” can be any Christian without distinction, Scripture itself will not allow such an interpretation, insisting that the “man of God” is a figure of authority, either commissioned by God directly through Divine Intervention (such as Moses or the Angel), or appointed by another holder of authority (such as Samuel, David, Elisha, and St. Timothy).

“If I bear witness to myself, my testimony is not true; there is another who bears witness to me, and I know that the testimony which he bears to me is true. You sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. Not that the testimony which I receive is from man; but I say this that you may be saved. He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. But the testimony which I have is greater than that of John; for the works which the Father has granted me to accomplish, these very works which I am doing, bear me witness that the Father has sent me.” (John 5:31-36)

If even Jesus submitted to this proof-test, how can any mere man exempt himself from this same test, unless he wishes to say he is greater than even Jesus?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top