can we have a discussion with Muslims without getting angry

  • Thread starter Thread starter deb1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Moslem Apologetics is an oxymoron.

Koranic exegesis is an oxymoron.

I have yet to meet a Moslem who will argue openly on the abyssmal differences between Islam and Christianity.

Every Moslem I have talked with has based any discussion of Judaism/Christianity/Islam on the assertions that 1. Jesus is a minor prophet of Allah; 2. The Jews are hated by Allah and are the offspring of Demons; 3. Abraham and Moses were really Moslem, not Jewish, and that 4. Women do not have souls and are not equal to Men before Allah.

There is the problem, deb1, it’s a fundamental perceptual handicap on the part of their beliefs, it has nothing to do with “playing nice” with a prosletyzing Moslem.

Pax Christi
Meedo doesn’t get angry.
 
The worst of it comes from the worst of us . There are bad sides on every side of us , muslims and christians and jews . Mosques get burned all around the states every day . A muslim lady with Children simply walking in the streets got shot and killed for no reason whatsoever. etc etc etc …

meedo
I have to disagree here with your claim that Mosques get burned all around the states every day. Dont you think that this is a bit far fetched? If this were true the Muslim sensitive media here would be on this like stink on a skunk. There may be occassions where there is tension but to embellish your thoughts into an play it as fact is disengenuous.

The mosques here in the US have got to be the most protected buildings in the world besides the Islamic republics in the world. There is literal fear of damaging mosques for fear of reprisals as we have seen in the third world countries.
 
I have to disagree here with your claim that Mosques get burned all around the states every day. Dont you think that this is a bit far fetched? If this were true the Muslim sensitive media here would be on this like stink on a skunk. There may be occassions where there is tension but to embellish your thoughts into an play it as fact is disengenuous.

The mosques here in the US have got to be the most protected buildings in the world besides the Islamic republics in the world. There is literal fear of damaging mosques for fear of reprisals as we have seen in the third world countries.
The idea that mosques are being burnt is simply a means to justify their angry ends

Mosques here aren’t being burnt either. Even when there was ‘tension’ at Cronulla Beach -following the fact Moslems beat up a couple of life-guards the mosques were safe.

Though the following week there was a riot and some Moslems were beaten up they attacked back and did so not just in Cronulla, but attacked a church about 40km away in a multi-cultural part of Sydney.
 
I have to disagree here with your claim that Mosques get burned all around the states every day. Dont you think that this is a bit far fetched? If this were true the Muslim sensitive media here would be on this like stink on a skunk. There may be occassions where there is tension but to embellish your thoughts into an play it as fact is disengenuous.

The mosques here in the US have got to be the most protected buildings in the world besides the Islamic republics in the world. There is literal fear of damaging mosques for fear of reprisals as we have seen in the third world countries.
I don’t agree that the media are Muslim sensitive.

Did you see any national headlines about the Afghani woman who was shot dead in freemont while walking to pick up her kids?

How about coverage of the man who videotaped himself throwing a pig’s head inside a mosque?

How about the Palestinian students who were beaten by their own football team at a Virginia college?

Lots of incidents go by without much fuss.
 
I am often afraid to post on threads discussing topics with Muslims. It makes me very sad see Catholics who I strongly respect getting so angry. It isn’t that I agree with Islam-I’d be Muslim if I did- but I don’t understand why we can’t have mature discussions with one another without getting so angry.😦 Can we just treat one another with common courtesy?
I think if we didn’t have a war going on with Muslim terrorists, there would be kinder words said about Muslims.
I know it’s unfair to lump all of them into one category like that but it’s human nature.
 
Originally Posted by deb1
I am often afraid to post on threads discussing topics with Muslims. It makes me very sad see Catholics who I strongly respect getting so angry. It isn’t that I agree with Islam-I’d be Muslim if I did- but I don’t understand why we can’t have mature discussions with one another without getting so angry. Can we just treat one another with common courtesy?

Where was the “mature” discussion before moslems flew two hijacked airliners into the World trade Center and murdered 348 of my brother firefighters, police officers and paramedics along with over 3000 innocent civilians? Where was the “mature” discussion before moslems flew a hijacked airliner into the Pentagon, killing 183 of my service brothers and sisters? Where was the “mature” discussion when moslems killed 258 of my Marine brothers in Beirut? Where is the rational discussion when moslems are sending our military home killed and wounded by cowardly IED attacks? So-called “moderate” moslems are silent (yeah Pro, I’ve heard your weak protests, have you lost anyone to moslem terrorism, Pro? I have.) and moslem oil states continue to send money to finance the killing of Americans and others. Moslems have proven themselves to be the enemy by not rising up against those who have blackened their name and polluted their religion by their cowardly actions. Why are not these “moderate” moslems marching in the streets screaming “Death to Terrorists!” instead of “Death to America” ? Turn the other cheek?" We have run out of cheeks to turn. Their aim is to subjugate the West and force their false religion upon the Infidel. Don’t you forget it.
 
I think if we didn’t have a war going on with Muslim terrorists, there would be kinder words said about Muslims.
I know it’s unfair to lump all of them into one category like that but it’s human nature.
Leftists and other Muslim apologists try to portray it that way, but it’s not that simple!
 
I think if we didn’t have a war going on with Muslim terrorists, there would be kinder words said about Muslims.
I know it’s unfair to lump all of them into one category like that but it’s human nature.
The problem however is we’re not at war against Moslem terrorists but ‘terror’

The War on Terror is what they call it, as if we might have a war on ‘machine-guns’ or any other ‘weapon’ Moslems might use.
 
Leftists and other Muslim apologists try to portray it that way, but it’s not that simple!
I count myself as a ‘leftist’ as I’ve always voted for more socialist parties however I can’t abide the fact that they all support Islam.
 
Leftists and other Muslim apologists try to portray it that way, but it’s not that simple!
So feelings still run deep toward Muslims, even if there wasn’t a war going on or even if the war had never happened?
 
I think if we didn’t have a war going on with Muslim terrorists, there would be kinder words said about Muslims.
I know it’s unfair to lump all of them into one category like that but it’s human nature.
I have to agree with you there. When I did my paper on the Patriot Act I researched Americas History to find other instances where people may have been looked at as terrorists. I was not on this planet yet but I found that in the 40’s and 50’s America wasn’t afraid of Arabs, they were afraid of Russians. The FBI could secretly wire-tap, kidnapp and detain anyone they thought was a Communist, without filing any charges against them. Librarians were asked by the government to give them all the records of all the books that were being checked out by anyone with a Russian sounding name, whether they were suspected of a crime or not. School nurses were asked for the records of children with Russian sounding names. Churches that they attended were spied on. It was not fair to group them all together either.
 
That’s kinda what I thought. I know that I personally didn’t even hardly know about them and what they believed.
I didn’t either. Sept. 11 put Islam in the limelight and that’s what made me want to find out what made people commit murder and suicide that way. I’d heard of a man called Osama bin Ladin who hated the US and threatened attacks and all that but I’d never paid much attention. Then the unthinkable happened and our eyes were opened.

Now people all over the world are scrutinizing Islam and its teachings. The more I learn about it, the less I like it! 😦

Vickie
 
Before Sept. 11, I doubt if many Americans gave Islam a thought!
In the 80s I considered becoming Moslem, after becoming dissatisfied with Catholicism.

The little I encountered then struck me as being illogical, for I didn’t understand then how one could claim to both respect a book (as a message from God) and also contradict its message.

I have been a member a Moslem student group at university.

I too became more aware of Islam’s insidious nature after 11th September 2001. However I was aware of a large number of Moslem sources and researched through these and discovered from their own lips, so to speak, many great horrors.
 
What does race have to do with it?
Main Entry: 1prej·u·dice
Pronunciation: 'pre-j&-d&s
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin praejudicium previous judgment, damage, from prae- + judicium judgment – more at JUDICIAL
1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one’s rights; especially : detriment to one’s legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics

When used in the context of prejudice, race can refer to any group of people with shared characteristics ie, Muslims.
 
Except that there’s no Moslem ‘race’
You are missing the point. In the context of prejudice, any targeted group is considered a “race”. Therefore, hatred of Moslems, becuase they are Moslems, is racist. This perspecitve is also properly applied to those who “hate gays” as I heard one young man tell me yesterday. It is racist. But no one would say that gays are a “race” per se.
 
You are missing the point. In the context of prejudice, any targeted group is considered a “race”. Therefore, hatred of Moslems, becuase they are Moslems, is racist. This perspecitve is also properly applied to those who “hate gays” as I heard one young man tell me yesterday. It is racist. But no one would say that gays are a “race” per se.
There is a difference between hating people and hating the ideology that motivates them! All Muslim apologists make this mistake!

Vickie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top