P
Path_Finder
Guest
Cruz leading in Alaska, yet to be declared, Trump close.
I just saw on Twitter, Fox News has called a win in Alaska for Cruz.Cruz leading in Alaska, yet to be declared, Trump close.
I mean…“If Hillary can’t satisfy her husband, how can she satisfy America?” Mr Trump has asked
PS I know the above was a “re-tweet” on the part of Trump but it epitomizes what he believes. He favourably re-tweeted that vile comment.How can Catholics in good conscience vote for a man who makes remarks like this:
I mean…
Such a crude, sexist, vile, crass statement is entirely unbecoming of a political figure, let alone a prospective POTUS.
I am so disappointed in many of you.
Pious folk are OK with lewdness and vulgarity now? Has it been “baptized” so to speak?
Unless something big changes in the trajectory of the race, Donald Trump will be the nominee. I’ve seen some talk of a proposal of Cruz and Rubio going on one ticket. Perhaps that should be tried to stop Trump. It’s a narrow path for either of them to win on their own.I am horrified that the GOP is about to nominate Trump for President. It is frankly a crime against humanity. The rest of the world is watching aghast. How it is physically or abstractly possible for self - proclaimed conservatives to vote for a demagogue who would rely on an ever more over blown use of presidential prerogative than Obama ever exercised and who is anything but a traditional conservative, is beyond me. He doesn’t even have a history of being pro - life but that’s OK apparently because he really hates Muslims and Mexicans and wants to beat the **** out of terror suspects and build huge walls to separate people and murder the families of suspected terrorists. Has the US gone entirely insane? Civil liberties and the rule of law seem to be of no importance to the masses of people voting for Trump because he would undermine both of them. If Americans would like to democratically destroy the very foundations of their own liberal, constitutional democracy, then sure thing go ahead and vote for Trump.
“Nor are any of them champions of killing babies from conception to birth”? Really?At least none of the Republican candidates are criminals, national security risks or participated in the cover up of the death of Americans. Nor are any of them champions of killing babies from conception to birth.
I been looking into the phenomenon and attached are some essays for consideration. Ultimately, I posit that Trump is the product of a century of dissolution of public morals and virtue. The seed was planted exactly when, I don’t know, perhaps with Lincoln maybe Theodore Roosevelt but it is bearing fruit now.I am horrified that the GOP is about to nominate Trump for President. It is frankly a crime against humanity. The rest of the world is watching aghast. How it is physically or abstractly possible for self - proclaimed conservatives to vote for a demagogue who would rely on an ever more over blown use of presidential prerogative than Obama ever exercised and who is anything but a traditional conservative, is beyond me. He doesn’t even have a history of being pro - life but that’s OK apparently because he really hates Muslims and Mexicans and wants to beat the **** out of terror suspects and build huge walls to separate people and murder the families of suspected terrorists. Has the US gone entirely insane? Civil liberties and the rule of law seem to be of no importance to the masses of people voting for Trump because he would undermine both of them. If Americans would like to democratically destroy the very foundations of their own liberal, constitutional democracy, then sure thing go ahead and vote for Trump.
The UK Parliament may ban Trump from stepping foot on our territory. Is it really conceivable that the next POTUS is a person who could actually be banned from visiting a nation that is his country’s closest ally?Unless something big changes in the trajectory of the race, Donald Trump will be the nominee. I’ve seen some talk of a proposal of Cruz and Rubio going on one ticket. Perhaps that should be tried to stop Trump. It’s a narrow path for either of them to win on their own.
Thanks for the article Steve, I will read it in full.I been looking into the phenomenon and attached are some essays for consideration. Ultimately, I posit that Trump is the product of a century of dissolution of public morals and virtue. The seed was planted exactly when, I don’t know, perhaps with Lincoln maybe Theodore Roosevelt but it is bearing fruit now.
“Posterity–you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it.”
-John Quincy Adams
Sorry, John. We didn’t. We gave it a pretty good run for a while, but its over.
wordaroundthe.net/2016/03/why-its-over.html
And he continues to praise Planned Parenthood by name - how is that not championing the killing of unborn babies?How can Catholics in good conscience vote for a man who makes remarks like this:
The UK Parliament might want to rethink banning the potential leader of its closest ally.The UK Parliament may ban Trump from stepping foot on our territory. Is it really conceivable that the next POTUS is a person who could actually be banned from visiting a nation that is his country’s closest ally?
This is the incredulous situation we are approaching now. Trump is universally hated outside of the U.S. He will humiliate the U.S. internationally at a time when what the world needs most is real, visionary leadership from America: not a foul-mouthed playboy with a lewd past, privileged upbringing and xenophobic ideas.
I reiterate: I am so disappointed in the portion of the American electorate that has backed this imbecile. It is shameful that someone like Trump could viably be elected next November. Shameful.
And he continues to praise Planned Parenthood by name - how is that not championing the killing of unborn babies?
How can anyone who’s pro-life - consistently pro-life, including after the baby’s born, not just pro-birth or anti-abortion – vote for someone who consistently praises PP?
If he becomes President there will be worldwide panic. I assure you.The UK Parliament might want to rethink banning the potential leader of its closest ally.
I’ve always said that the Republicans should choose the candidate that best represents them and it seems like they are leaning towards Mr. Trump, so I can only assume that he best represents the Republican electorate. The rest of the world will just have to deal with it.
Don’t you think that’s a tiny bit of an exaggeration?If he becomes President there will be worldwide panic. I assure you.
He hasn’t caused global warming, nor islamic terrorism, nor world hunger, nor rampant crime. How do you judge him so severely to think he’s going to ruin the world?If he becomes President there will be worldwide panic. I assure you.
He also continued to say, planned parenthood shouldn’t be funded as long as they do abortions.And he continues to praise Planned Parenthood by name - how is that not championing the killing of unborn babies?
How can anyone who’s pro-life - consistently pro-life, including after the baby’s born, not just pro-birth or anti-abortion – vote for someone who consistently praises PP?
If he realistically intends to ban 1 billion people from entering the U.S. based only on their religion, compel countries reliant on U.S. military protection like South Korea to pay colossal amounts for U.S. bases to protect them from nuclear annihilation from the North and Japan vis-à-vis China when they already pay half the costs, build a huge wall to keep out people from America’s southern neighbour etc. etc.Don’t you think that’s a tiny bit of an exaggeration?