M
meltzerboy2
Guest
Really? You don’t feel ANY attachment whatsoever toward others who are not family members or close friends? Do you not contribute to any charity or sometimes help a stranger in need?
I watched the whole video before making my post, but I obviously disagreed. I have no sympathy for these people who knowingly broke the law and are now facing the consequences whether they have children or not. The law must be enforced. Since they weren’t listening when it was enforced leniently, it must be enforced more strictly.This point is addressed in the video. Since I think it unrealistic to watch a video you do not like…
so how is justice served when parents are arrested and their children placed into foster care? Since the parents dont care, I could not care less about the harm it does to those children. Justice can not be served by allowing people into this country that have no right to be here. Just because Cardinal Dolan says so doesnt make it so.Tell us what you know about the lasting psychological toll of housing children in institutions.
I was right, wasn’t I? You don’t really know.
At least explain to the rest of us how justice is best served by separating small children and infants from their parents, causing irreparable harm to the children, in cases such as these in which the parents do not pose a grave threat to society.
Yes, I think the U.S. could help the common citizen in these countries-supply them with weapons. They could stage a coup like in the Cristero War. Of course then some people would complain about the U.S. intervening…but the U.S. intervened in the Cristero War too.Blockquote There are times when this can happen, of course, but in many countries/areas, the corruption is so severe that any aid does not get to the desperate. It is funneled off by the people who have the guns!
Respectfully agree with you, Honorable Cardinal Dolan has taken and has made it >>>>>>>very clear his strong stance against abortion and doing so also >>>>with children being taken from their mothers arms." …that to violently take a baby from its mother’s womb is wrong, and to violently take a baby from its mother’s arms on the border, that’s immoral; that’s wrong."
Again, find one bishop that has said this policy is okay, and I will admit it is a valid moral position for a Catholic to hold, and not just another point for Americans to dissent from the Church.Just because Cardinal Dolan says so doesnt make it so.
Well for at least one person posting here even this should be wrong as we need toThats true…many U.S. citizens have broken the law and had to be separated from their kids. I feel for the kids, but its a parents job to consider their kid’s interests-first and foremost-to stay with their family and to not do anything that could jeopardize that.
“At least explain to the rest of us how justice is best served by separating small children and infants from their parents, causing irreparable harm to the children, in cases such as these in which the parents do not pose a grave threat to society”.
I have no problem with soup kitchens or homeless shelter as long as government isnt involved. BTW my wife and I give thousands to charity every year. It is just we are very selective as to which charity we give to, St Judes is my charity of choice. BTW after ACA passed I stopped giving any money to the church as my health care cost went up the amount I gave to the church.So you’re not a big advocate of, for example, soup kitchens and homeless shelters for the hungry and needy? Another form of welfare? At least you gave me an honest answer; I appreciate that.
Respectfully was Jesus not saying Who are my mother and my Brothers?Jesus started all that sort of talk. For Catholics who go to Mass every Sunday this is readily known, as it was the reading just last week.
No one owns this>> World >>but we are all to share in all the Natural Resources >>>this World has freely given and provides for all our Human needs right?We are all >>Human Beings>>We are all Brother and Sister, belonging to >>The One Human Family>>> called >>The Human Race>>are we not?
This World provides all the natural resources we will ever need >>to be able to continue to evolve>exist>> to be nourished and to be able to prosper, no one should be going with out, should they?
Rather>>>> should we all be looking at the>>> root cause of >>why?? >>theses parents, with their precious children>>>> are being forced on foot, to flee their own homeland in great fear?Just because one is born first >>>in an open field or in a certain part of the world >>>does not mean that >>human being now>> owns that field or that part of this world, does it? >>>![]()
It is quite clearly a moral issue.I thought bishops weren’t supposed to be politicians.
Yes, ma’am. That’s right. From the Scripture, this can be used only to point out that our family is not just our immediate family. Only that. I used it as the first time that I can remember this concept being explained in these terms. Jesus used more intimate terms later though when he spoke of that which we do to the least as being done directly to him.Respectfully was Jesus not saying Who are my mother and my Brothers?