E
Earnest_Bunbury
Guest
Anywho… The OP must be taken in context with what proceeds it:
The problem isn’t in saying Muslims worship the same God, but to include Muslim practices into Catholicism as something legitimate in place of that which was handed down or is taught by the Church, in opposition to humble docility or obedience. Vat II states that we don’t deny what is true in other religions as a means of evangelizing, not of being evangelized. This is the problem with those who have dubious faith being led into temptation in opposition to the one, true Faith by way of enneagram, Jungian psychology, spiritual writers who dissent, Mass as a meal and not a sacrifice, denying the reality of hell and thus do nothing to avoid it, etc. This seems to be more of a problem than a teaching not condemning Muslims strongly enough. How do we know they will be condemned more for not knowing then we will for knowing and not doing?
842The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race:
All nations form but one community. This is so because all stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered together in the holy city. . .
843 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as “a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life.”
844 In their religious behavior, however, men also display the limits and errors that disfigure the image of God in them:
Code:Very often, deceived by the Evil One, men have become vain in their reasonings, and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and served the creature rather than the Creator. Or else, living and dying in this world without God, they are exposed to ultimate despair.
Doesn’t the Church say there are extenuating circumstances that reduce moral culpability?845 To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son’s Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is “the world reconciled.” She is that bark which “in the full sail of the Lord’s cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world.” According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah’s ark, which alone saves from the flood.
The problem isn’t in saying Muslims worship the same God, but to include Muslim practices into Catholicism as something legitimate in place of that which was handed down or is taught by the Church, in opposition to humble docility or obedience. Vat II states that we don’t deny what is true in other religions as a means of evangelizing, not of being evangelized. This is the problem with those who have dubious faith being led into temptation in opposition to the one, true Faith by way of enneagram, Jungian psychology, spiritual writers who dissent, Mass as a meal and not a sacrifice, denying the reality of hell and thus do nothing to avoid it, etc. This seems to be more of a problem than a teaching not condemning Muslims strongly enough. How do we know they will be condemned more for not knowing then we will for knowing and not doing?