Catholic and Democrat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nonie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
estesbob:
Ignorance abounds. The Governor of Texas has no power to commute a death sentence-at the most he can grant a 30 day stay. I know this becaue I have lived in Texas for 25 yers and have been active in the anti-death penalty movement in Texas- I have attended many candle light prayer vigills in Huntsville on nights executions took place. I also, BTW, counsel in a crisis pregnancy center. What I dont do is suppot people who support abotion-period.
And who appoints the members of the board of parole that has to make the recommendation? The governor, no? And how many on the board were appointed by Mr. Bush by the time he had left office? All of them, no? And Mr. Bush did exercise the power to deny clemency over the recommendation of the board, did he not? How is that anything else but directly causing a person’s death? That seems a grave matter under his personal control.

Also, did he make any effort to change the law? To the contrary. He said simply, “If you come to Texas, don’t kill anybody.” How many of those 30 day stays did he grant? One? I hope I’m wrong, but I wouldn’t look to see him at any execution-night prayer vigils. He is frankly pro-death-penalty, and says so in statements that sometimes stray into the flippant in their callous tone.
40.png
estesbob:
It is a disapointment to me that neither Bush nor my Church opposes the death penalty. However your trying to equate the execution of 100 or so convicted murderers a year with the wanton slaughter of 1.3 MILLION children a year is specious… What we see in your posts is a desperate attempt to rationaize your support for this wanton slaughter of the innocents. I dont think you realize how foolish you look to Catholics who adhere to the Church’s teahings.
In 54 countries (61% of the world population) abortions are legal. In 97 countries (39% of the world population) abortions are illegal. There are approximately 46 million abortions conducted each year, 20 million of them obtained illegally.

In other words, getting abortion made illegal will not stop abortions. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a start, but that what it will be: a start.

I’m not concerned with whether anyone thinks I appear foolish. How is it, though, that you made the assumption that I don’t adhere to the Church’s teachings? Because I wrote, “I think we could have done far better, had we other choices among the living than the last two elections gave us.” Well, it is not as if Mr. Kerry or Mr. Edwards opposed the death penalty. As far as I know, their records are as bad as Mr. Bush’s, even if they haven’t left quite the trail of callous quotes concerning those on death row.

Mr. Bush leaves a lot to be desired. In spite of the number of our brothers and sisters who seem to think he walks on water and stems the rate of abortion, he isn’t going to cause a stampede of believers out of the Democratic party.
 
40.png
BLB_Oregon:
In other words, getting abortion made illegal will not stop abortions. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a start, but that what it will be: a start.

Mr. Bush leaves a lot to be desired. In spite of the number of our brothers and sisters who seem to think he walks on water and stems the rate of abortion, he isn’t going to cause a stampede of believers out of the Democratic party.
The stampede has begun-look at the Catholic support of Bush last election as compared to previous elections.

I am glad you acknowledge your error and now understand that the Governor of Texas has no power to commute a death sentence to a life sentence. And as we found out with Bush’s Fathers appointments to the Supreme Court appointng someone to a postion in no way assures they will do your bidding.

I am perplexed that you keep trying to convince me the death penatly is wrong. Unlike you I am so passionate in my oppostion to it I actually try and do something about it. It is obvious , however, that your oppostion to the death penatly begins and end with you oppostion to George Bush. It is a common postion. When Bush became Governor we were amazed at how many new people were showing up for vigils at executions-people who evidently werent nearly as concerned about the death Penalty when Democrat Ann Richards was in office.

One of the problems of those of us oppose the death penalty run into is the insincerity of so many of those who purport to support the cause. For instance it was a real zoo the night they executed Gary Graham. Instead of a dozen or so standing in silent protest we had celebrity night! 100s in attendance and speeches by Jesse Jackson, Bianca Jagger and a host of other celebrities and celebrity wanna be’s. And boy did Bush take a beating.

A week later, at the execution of a Hispanic who had killed a drug dealer in a drug deal gone bad we were back to the dozen or so in silent protest-this mans life did matter much becuase they couldnt use his death for political purposes. It is all so interesing to note that there was never much publicity and absolutely no national criticism when Ann Richards was the Governor.

As I said I suspect you fall into that categoery of those who’s oppostion to the Death penalty begins and ends with your opposition to George bush. It is rather obvious from your posts-your ignorance of the laws of Texas was a sure tip off-you were regurgitatng the Democrat talking points from the last two elections. But the real tip off is you claim that you oppose Republicans becuase they support the death Penatly while praising a Party who’s last three candidates also supported the death penalty! In fact there is very little oppostion to the Death penatly in the Democrat party.

I am, BTW, very aware that Bush would not have stopped the executions if he could have. I said I was disapointed in him for that-in fact that is my biggest bone to pick with the Republican party. However the number of executions in minsicule comapred to number of abortion and more importantly to me my Church allows for the death penalty.

Which brings us to the biggest errors in your posts - your contention that the Church opposes the death penatly. I wish they did but to contend so or even hint it is so is a flat out lie that needs to be corrected.

5 years ago at a reception for a friend of mines Ordination I cornered Archbishop Fiorenza and confronted him with some of the same quotes you used. He patiently explained to me that one would be correct in assumeing that John Paul II opposed the death penatly as it was practiced in the US. He said one could also correctly assume that that was the position of the American Bishops. However, he explained, it was wroing to read into that that the Church’s teachings condemned the death penalty as pracitced in the US. He told me the Church was very careful NOT to comment on the practices in the US-that is they had stated no official opinion as to whether the death penalty in the US fullfilled the requiremts laid out in the Catechism-he told me it was important to remember this becuase if the Pope wanted to he could chage the catechism with a stroke of a pen. He chose not to.

To be totally honest, unlike many in the movement, I have very little sympathy for those who are executed. Most, like Gary Graham, are the scum of the earth. I didn’t even buy into the fact Karla Faye Tucker deserved comutation becuase she had been born again-i couldnt get the vision of the pick axe she stuck in her victims head out of my mind. However I beleive that these people are under lock and key moral thing to do is to let them rot in jail.

We should all note, when preparing to vote, that our Church unequivocably condemns politicians who support abortion… There is no such statement concerning politicians who support the death penalty.
 
40.png
Anglican77:
I agree with you that the two-party system does not work. Neither party seems attractive to me, however, I tend to vote for Democrats, but I research each candidate and their platforms before voting. I never vote one party. As for why I don’t use pro-life as the only determinate for voting, I truly have a hard time believing that any candidate, whether pro-life or not, will or can do anything to stop it.
Someone posted that it is not biblically correct to choose the “lesser of 2 evils” when choosing between the democrats and republicans? But there is no party that believes in all the following Pro-life values:
  1. Against abortion
  2. Against capital punishment
    3… Against war-- the way it was initiated in Iraq
I know that many out there will say that the war in Iraq followed the theory of “just war”". But both the late John Paul 11 and our current pope have explicitly come out with statements condemming the war in Iraq:

cjd.org/paper/jp2war.html
natcath.com/NCR_Online/a…703/030703i.htm
cathnews.com/news/302/121.php
cathnews.com/news/303/124.php

God bless you,
Teresa
.
 
40.png
tgerlinger143:
Someone posted that it is not biblically correct to choose the “lesser of 2 evils” when choosing between the democrats and republicans? But there is no party that believes in all the following Pro-life values:
  1. Against abortion
  2. Against capital punishment
    3… Against war-- the way it was initiated in Iraq
I know that many out there will say that the war in Iraq followed the theory of “just war”". But both the late John Paul 11 and our current pope have explicitly come out with statements condemming the war in Iraq:

cjd.org/paper/jp2war.html
natcath.com/NCR_Online/a…703/030703i.htm
cathnews.com/news/302/121.php
cathnews.com/news/303/124.php

God bless you,
Teresa
.
But the Church dd not-in fact the Church both John Paul the Great and B16 made it clear they were NOT stating that they had found the war unjust per the teachings of the Church.
 
40.png
Jocelyn:
I don’t have TV (by choice after my daughter was born) so I would like to be educated.

What is Bush actively doing to overturn Roe vs Wade?

Does anyone speculate that Roe vs Wade will be overturned during the Bush administration?
Everything that is within his power. he has repeatedly condemned abortion, he has reversed the Clinton era funding of international abortion prviders, he has signed a partial borth abortion bill and most importantly he has consistently appointed pro-life federal judges.

Also Dont underestimate the power of the Bully Pulpit.I can recall the difficualty we had counseling young women at the CPC when Cllinton was President. Its hard to convince them abortion is wrong when the duly elected President of the United States was trumpeting it as a fundamental right for all women. It was also, BTW, very difficult to relate to them that oral sex was indeed sexual activity and that having sex with older men was a huge mistake.
 
40.png
Jocelyn:
An afterthought…

President Bush made such a hoop-la about social security. I wish he would make such a hoop-la about abortion.

What about the birthcontrol pill? It causes abortions. If Roe vs. Wade is overturned will they have to stop the dispensing of the bc pill.
No-all overturning Roe V wade would do is return the issue to the States. Griswold vs Conneticut would still rule as far as contraception is conecerned.

BTW some versions of the pill don’t cause abortions. It all depends on whether the contraceptive is designed to stop conception or stop implantation. The former does not cause an abortion, the latter does. The Church, rightly so, condemns both.
 
It has occurred to me overnight that it is a huge waste of time to debate the future standing in history of a second-term president, and an even bigger waste of time to debate how Mr. Bush did as governor of Texas or whether or not anybody should have voted for him. Those are yesterday’s questions and tomorrow’s worries. They have next to nothing to do with today.

The question for today is this: What are the moral problems in each of the major parties, how can Catholics in those parties work to fix them, and is it true that either or both parties are so far gone as to be not worth fixing? What are our governments doing today that needs our support or opposition? These are today’s duties.

For instance, as much as I was unhappy about Harriet Meiers, I think Mr. Bush’s present choice is a good one, a person who will rule on what the law says, regardless of whether he personally likes it or not. As a justice, that will be his job. Making the laws right will fall to the rest of us. Right now, lending this nominee our support–particularly, in my case, as a registered Democrat, communicating my support to our Democratic senator, Mr. Wyden–is today’s work. Those of us who haven’t jumped out of the Democratic party are in a particular position to do some good. We should get with it and do it! After all, our senators know how we’re registered, not how we voted last time around.

I don’t mean for Democrats to lambast the Republicans, or vice versa. I mean for Democrats and Republicans to ask themselves how they can best bring their party more around to doing the work of the Kingdom of God, or if that is even possible. Of course, we’re all going to vote, but where should our efforts go today?

I think the answer is going to be a little different for each of us, because each of us has a different local party, each has different local issues, each has different individual talents and opportunities. But it is not good enough to content yourself that your party is the best out there. Whichever party you are in, it is not nearly good enough yet.
 
40.png
BLB_Oregon:
It has occurred to me overnight that it is a huge waste of time to debate the future standing in history of a second-term president, and an even bigger waste of time to debate how Mr. Bush did as governor of Texas or whether or not anybody should have voted for him. Those are yesterday’s questions and tomorrow’s worries. They have next to nothing to do with today.

The question for today is this: What are the moral problems in each of the major parties, how can Catholics in those parties work to fix them, and is it true that either or both parties are so far gone as to be not worth fixing? What are our governments doing today that needs our support or opposition? These are today’s duties.

For instance, as much as I was unhappy about Harriet Meiers, I think Mr. Bush’s present choice is a good one, a person who will rule on what the law says, regardless of whether he personally likes it or not. As a justice, that will be his job. Making the laws right will fall to the rest of us. Right now, lending this nominee our support–particularly, in my case, as a registered Democrat, communicating my support to our Democratic senator, Mr. Wyden–is today’s work. Those of us who haven’t jumped out of the Democratic party are in a particular position to do some good. We should get with it and do it! After all, our senators know how we’re registered, not how we voted last time around.

I don’t mean for Democrats to lambast the Republicans, or vice versa. I mean for Democrats and Republicans to ask themselves how they can best bring their party more around to doing the work of the Kingdom of God, or if that is even possible. Of course, we’re all going to vote, but where should our efforts go today?

I think the answer is going to be a little different for each of us, because each of us has a different local party, each has different local issues, each has different individual talents and opportunities. But it is not good enough to content yourself that your party is the best out there. Whichever party you are in, it is not nearly good enough yet.
I agree. The real question is how are we, as Catholics going to address the moral problems that face this country today? We often spend so much time fighting among ourselves we dont keep “our eye on the prize”, that is a country that has an overwhelming respect for life. My Mother is a lifelong Democrat as are all my siblings-we all share a disadin for abortion-we profoundly disagree on the best way to end it. The best thing that could happen for this country would be to have Roe V Wade overturned and thus remove abortion as a national issue. I supect I could then find myself voting for a Demcorat like Bill Richardson or Joe Liebeman-maybe even a republican like Rudy Guliani. But until abortion is no longer before the Supreme Court I will not vote for a Presdidential candidate that does not have solid pro-life credentials.
 
40.png
estesbob:
But until abortion is no longer before the Supreme Court I will not vote for a Presdidential candidate that does not have solid pro-life credentials.
Well, until then, give those Republicans the devil when they fall short. Who knows, they may become the party the Democrats should have.

Good luck and God bless you.
 
My concern is that the Fundamentalist Christians are using other social conservatives such as Catholics and Mormons to further their own agenda. Once they take over do you really think they will have any use for us? Remember they want everyone to be Fundamentalists and pretty much hate every other religion. Have you ever heard some of the stuff that they say about Catholics?

So why would it be in our best interests to let them take over the country? Maybe I’m just being too paranoid.
 
40.png
BLB_Oregon:
Well, until then, give those Republicans the devil when they fall short. Who knows, they may become the party the Democrats should have.

Good luck and God bless you.
B;leive me I do-I refused to vote for kat Bailey Hutchison last tinme around and i made sure she knew why.
 
40.png
Ryniev:
My concern is that the Fundamentalist Christians are using other social conservatives such as Catholics and Mormons to further their own agenda. Once they take over do you really think they will have any use for us? Remember they want everyone to be Fundamentalists and pretty much hate every other religion. Have you ever heard some of the stuff that they say about Catholics?

So why would it be in our best interests to let them take over the country? Maybe I’m just being too paranoid.
Lot of misunderstanding among Catholics about Evangelical Chrisitaisn and from Evangelical Christians about Catholics. I will admit to holding a lot of ther prejudices when i started working with Evangelicas at the local CPC. We all learned a lot and we were all united in the common goal of ending Abortion.

Could you spcifically tell us what agenda they have that scares you?
 
40.png
Ryniev:
My concern is that the Fundamentalist Christians are using other social conservatives such as Catholics and Mormons to further their own agenda. Once they take over do you really think they will have any use for us? Remember they want everyone to be Fundamentalists and pretty much hate every other religion. Have you ever heard some of the stuff that they say about Catholics?

So why would it be in our best interests to let them take over the country? Maybe I’m just being too paranoid.
Well, we think it would be pretty ideal if more people joined the one true faith. Let’s not get on their case for that.

I have heard some of the stuff they say about Catholics. There are not a few who are worried that the elite Catholics are going to take everything over. They have said this stuff to my face, quite concerned that we worship the Pope or Mary or that some secret bunch of Jesuits control the post office and heavens knows what else. My favorite was a characterization of a co-worker, “She’s a very good Christian, even though she’s Catholic.” Generally speaking, they mean well and want to win souls for Jesus. They believe some of the lies fed to them, and spring to rash judgement. It will not do for us to follow suit!

I agree that it is best that we keep in mind, though, that other Christians and other Americans can use the same words as we do and not mean the same thing. They can be well-meaning and even be people we agree with much of the time and still be wrong once in awhile. This is worth keeping an eye out for, but not a reason to be paranoid about people with many of the same goals as we have.

I have a saying: When it comes to walking and not just talking, we’re all heretics. You’ll be measured to as you measure, so make your measure generous. When you must judge at all, judge as you would be judged, in a spirit of mercy and compassion, with an aim towards reconciliation, amendment, and ultimately, perfection by our God. After all, we’ll all have a few not-so-comfortable self-revelations to go with our joy when our Savior returns.
 
40.png
BLB_Oregon:
, “She’s a very good Christian, even though she’s Catholic.” Generally speaking, they mean well and want to win souls for Jesus. .
Reminds me of the Bus ride I took from Houstonj to DC ten years ago to the Promise Keepers rally. I was the only Catholic on a bus of 45 evangelical men. I had no sooner sat down than my seatmate told me he had just finished a 12 part course on how to evangelize Catholics. We talked for a while and he got up and talked to some other people and soon i started hearing people whisper “Bob is a SAVED Catholic” it was like a two headed man had got on the bus.

You are right they mean well-they sincerely believe out souls are at risk and they need to save us. I always keep that in mind when they start trying to “save” me-they are acting out of love-misguide as it is. The funniest time was when a long term Muslim client sat me down and expressed his concern that i worshipped three Gods and was afraid for my soul-now that was an interesting conversation.!
 
40.png
estesbob:
Lot of misunderstanding among Catholics about Evangelical Chrisitaisn and from Evangelical Christians about Catholics. I will admit to holding a lot of ther prejudices when i started working with Evangelicas at the local CPC. We all learned a lot and we were all united in the common goal of ending Abortion.

Could you spcifically tell us what agenda they have that scares you?
The Reconstructionist Movement for one. This is probably a more liberal source but you can find other information all over the internet. I realize that this sounds pretty far out there but I visited a Calvary Chapel church with an ex-Catholic friend and they hold to a lot of these views (in a less extreme form)

religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm

All religious organizations, congregations etc. other than strictly Fundamentalist Christianity would be suppressed. Nonconforming Evangelical, main line and liberal Christian religious institutions would no longer be allowed to hold services, organize, proselytize, etc. Society would revert to the laws and punishments of the Hebrew Scriptures. Any person who advocated or practiced other religious beliefs outside of their home would be tried for idolatry and executed. Blasphemy, adultery and homosexual behavior would be criminalized; those found guilty would also be executed.
 
40.png
Ryniev:
The Reconstructionist Movement for one. This is probably a more liberal source but you can find other information all over the internet. I realize that this sounds pretty far out there but I visited a Calvary Chapel church with an ex-Catholic friend and they hold to a lot of these views (in a less extreme form)

religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm

All religious organizations, congregations etc. other than strictly Fundamentalist Christianity would be suppressed. Nonconforming Evangelical, main line and liberal Christian religious institutions would no longer be allowed to hold services, organize, proselytize, etc. Society would revert to the laws and punishments of the Hebrew Scriptures. Any person who advocated or practiced other religious beliefs outside of their home would be tried for idolatry and executed. Blasphemy, adultery and homosexual behavior would be criminalized; those found guilty would also be executed.
Let me as tactful as possible. This tolerance site is a radical, antireligious, left wing group. Take anything they say with a huge grain of salt. For instance the Dominionist movement is all but non existent. It was created as a bogeyman by the likes of Bill Moyer of PBS and is based soley on a quote supposedly made by James Watts , former secretary of Interior for Reagan. Problem is the quote used by Moyer was bogus and Moyer was forced to retract and apologize tto Watts… Unfortunatley it keeps popping up all the time on sites like the one you linked to.

There simply is no large scale movement to impose a theocracy on the US. The groups represented on this site no more represent the views of Evangelicals or other main stream religions than do as Fred Phelsp viruntely anti-homosexual church in Topeka Kansas.

What we do have is a movement on the left to keep people of Faith out of the political discourse. They aint going to suceed with me. I have as much right to try and politically advance my views as formed by the Catholic Church as NOW and Planned parenthood do theirs.
 
Aaron I.:
Not to be insensitive, but it is pretty ironic. The Dems could actually be running the country now (horror of horrors) if they hadn’t killed off those people who would in large part be voting for them down the road.
“those people”…

<>>

With comments like this one, no wonder abortion remains legal.
 
40.png
Jocelyn:
I don’t have TV (by choice after my daughter was born) so I would like to be educated.

What is Bush actively doing to overturn Roe vs Wade?

Does anyone speculate that Roe vs Wade will be overturned during the Bush administration?
He is doing nothing, because he is PLINO.

Roe vs Wade will never be overturned… Both the Republican and Democrats parties reflect the majority of voting Americans who believe in a woman’s right to choose. It is that simple.

And to those who feel that Roe vs Wade hinges on Bush’s nominees -

When Bush nominated Miers… did you ever hear him say “Harriet Miers is Pro Life. I am Pro Life.”

When Bush nominated Alito… did you hear him say, “Judge Alito is Pro Life.” Of course not.

They are not, and he is not. Bush just wants to get them on the bench. After that, he can easily disavow anything that happens.
 
40.png
Bella3502:
He is doing nothing, because he is PLINO.

Roe vs Wade will never be overturned… Both the Republican and Democrats parties reflect the majority of voting Americans who believe in a woman’s right to choose. It is that simple.

And to those who feel that Roe vs Wade hinges on Bush’s nominees -

When Bush nominated Miers… did you ever hear him say “Harriet Miers is Pro Life. I am Pro Life.”

When Bush nominated Alito… did you hear him say, “Judge Alito is Pro Life.” Of course not.

They are not, and he is not. Bush just wants to get them on the bench. After that, he can easily disavow anything that happens.
 
40.png
Bella3502:
He is doing nothing, because he is PLINO.

Roe vs Wade will never be overturned… Both the Republican and Democrats parties reflect the majority of voting Americans who believe in a woman’s right to choose. It is that simple.

And to those who feel that Roe vs Wade hinges on Bush’s nominees -

When Bush nominated Miers… did you ever hear him say “Harriet Miers is Pro Life. I am Pro Life.”

When Bush nominated Alito… did you hear him say, “Judge Alito is Pro Life.” Of course not.

They are not, and he is not. Bush just wants to get them on the bench. After that, he can easily disavow anything that happens.
Bush has done everything that is within his power. he has repeatedly condemned abortion, he has reversed the Clinton era funding of international abortion prviders, he has signed a partial birth abortion bill and most importantly he has consistently appointed pro-life federal judges.

Also Dont underestimate the power of the Bully Pulpit.I can recall the difficualty we had counseling young women at the CPC when Cllinton was President. Its hard to convince them abortion is wrong when the duly elected President of the United States was trumpeting it as a fundamental right for all women. It was also, BTW, very difficult to relate to them that oral sex was indeed sexual activity and that having sex with older men was a huge mistake.

BTW-Roe V Wade will be overturned becuase there are millions and millions of Americans just like me that will make it happen. Rather than carp at the President why not help us? If you send me you zip code ill refer you to some local organizations that can join to help in this crucial fight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top