V
VivaCristoRey27
Guest
I should have been more clear. This discussion concerns the Limbo of the Fathers, not the Limbo of the Infants.God Bless
Limbo of the Fathers (that the just before Christ did not go to Heaven but to sheol or hades, Abraham’s Bosom or Paradise) is Catholic dogma.
Limbo of the Infants (that those who die with Original Sin on their souls but without having committed a sin, such as unbaptized children) is not Catholic dogma but simply a perennial and well-established teaching. It has recently become unfashionable to express a belief in the Limbo of the Infants but it is still the teaching of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church and is eminently reasonable.
So thus, you can be Catholic and deny the existence of the Limbo of the Infants but you cannot be Catholic and deny the existence of the Limbo of the Fathers. It is Catholic dogma and it is clearly discussed in Scripture.
There are five states in the afterlife:
Heaven
Purgatory
Limbo of the Fathers
Limbo of the Infants
Hell of the Damned
When Christ “descended into Hell”, as the Apostles’ Creed states, He descended to the Limbo of the Fathers to “preach to the spirits that were in prison”, as St. Peter states. Christ made it clear that Heaven was not opened until His Ascension. Thus, Moses and Elijah were not in Heaven before the Ascension.
Christ also did not have a glorified body until after the Resurrection. Yet He also shone in glory. Thus this verse does not disprove the dogma of the Limbo of the Fathers.
I am curious though, are you Roman Catholic or “Anglo-Catholic” or something, because you are quoting from a Protestant Bible (KJV) and saying that Church teaching isn’t in line with Scripture.