E
estesbob
Guest
But it may not be Hillary he loses toTrump is going to lose as badly as Dukakis.
I think folks around here know that. He has no chance of winning the general election.
Admit it. You know Trump isn’t going to win.
But it may not be Hillary he loses toTrump is going to lose as badly as Dukakis.
I think folks around here know that. He has no chance of winning the general election.
Admit it. You know Trump isn’t going to win.
On the contrary, it is not a vote by definition.Not voting because you dont choose to vote the lesser of two evils, is a vote for evil.
Baloney.Not voting because you dont choose to vote the lesser of two evils, is a vote for evil.
Yeah sure. . . .But it may not be Hillary he loses to
I don’t know. It still seems like anything can happen in both parties. Both Hillary and Trump lack stability, credibility and support of their own parties.Yeah sure. . . .
And I say this as someone not crazy about Clinton.
Clinton will be the next President.
But Kimberly is not the enemy as Hillary suggests all conservatives are, and I mentioned Obama and Trump together. You know one might do well to give a objective look at for example CNN.See, but Kimberly is a staunch conservative. That goes with my point that the main (95%) of those minorities in Fox are right wing.
Have you ever watched the Five in Fox News? Juan Williams is the only democrat, and they go after him, but the man fights back pretty well.
But according to you, Obama is just a mouth full of diarrhea, you have made it seem like Trump was Jesus Christ Jr.
If what Warren said, was false, she should be taken out of her senate seat.
All it takes for Evil to prevail in this world is for enough good men to do nothing. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.Baloney.
There’s no doubt CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC News, and Fox News all have dirt on their hands. None of these news agencies are going to give it to you 100%, we don’t have that type of journalism today. Now, we do have outstanding news anchors, I have stated I like Anderson Cooper and Wolf Blitzer from CNN, Chris Wallace, Shepard Smith and Bret Baier from Fox, from MSNBC/NBC Brian Williams and although he’s not there anymore Keith Olbermann.But Kimberly is not the enemy as Hillary suggests all conservatives are, and I mentioned Obama and Trump together. You know one might do well to give a objective look at for example CNN.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies.
What you say is possibly true, except that most people on this site are Republicans. Unlike Romney, Trump is expecting a large vote from white, working class Democrats, who may be underrepresented here on this site.Trump appears to be having difficulty cracking 50% on this site which may not bode well for him since I found polls on here from 2012 in which Romney was at 68.5% and 84%. And he still lost the Electoral College in a landslide.
I noticed this as ell. rump is going to loose at Dukakis levels.Trump appears to be having difficulty cracking 50% on this site which may not bode well for him since I found polls on here from 2012 in which Romney was at 68.5% and 84%. And he still lost the Electoral College in a landslide.
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=691698&highlight=2012+president+poll
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=696820&highlight=2012+president+poll
Here is a NAFTA case of how TPP would work against the environment and humans lives, except on a much large and dangerous scale, with WTO trumping national environmental regulations and laws:I was going to hold my nose and vote for Hilary Clinton, but news just came in that the Democrats refused to oppose the TPP in their platform, so I’m thinking of doing a write-in for Bernie Sanders.
I would never ever vote for Trump, which means hatred, bigotry, and annihilation of life on earth. (His position on the TPP and abortion just simply do not ring true – he has other nefarious reasons for saying what he says on these.)
But I can’t vote for Hilary now either.
There is probably no reason to say this, because I pray that after the dust has settles that all of us will come together in some way. I just want you to know that even though I don’t believe the same way you do about this issue, that I respect the stance of “lesser of two evils”. We all must make our own decision on this matter. This time around, I don’t think it’s an easy call for ANYBODY. And so, however your own conscience guides you, and so long as in the end you follow your own conscience, which is where the Holy Spirit speaks to us, then I get it. I really do. I wish I COULD apply the lesser of…yada yada yada principle to this election. It would be a lot easier on me. I’m going to crestfallen and miserable on the day after the election either way this time around.It sometimes amazes me that people whose principles are against virtually everything the Dem party stands for, buy into the Dem encouragement not to vote at all if they can’t vote for the “just like me without exception” party that doesn’t exist and never will.
For myself, I often find myself voting against, rather than for. If Hillary Clinton is elected, the only things that will arise “from the ashes” are a Repub party much like the one we have now, taxpayer funded abortion on demand without limitation for the remainder of my lifetime, even worse political corruption and a lot of foreign adventurism.
If we don’t oppose the promoters of abortion on demand, we’re supporting it.