Catholic Considering Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter IrishDude45
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Please provide some evidence!

… Christians cannot be forcibly converted - only pressured through the humiliation of dhimmitude.
In this one statement you have provided the evidence. Christianity does not allow for dhimmitude, but Islam does. Therefore, Allah can’t be God. I might add that the ancient Egyptian god Ra was worshiped as one god at a point in history, and he would fit your apparent definition of God.

The Islamic practice of dhimmitude also points out that Islam lacks a concept of the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would want to be treated.
 
“Islam says: ‘Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors!’” – That great Islamic holy man, Ayatollah Khomeini
I think you have quoted this before, and I think that I have already pointed out that Khomeini is a Shi’ite and not necessarily followed even by all Shi’ites.

Furthermore, the quote does not address the question. Absolutely nothing in this quote says anything about why Allah should be worshiped.

Edwin
 
In this one statement you have provided the evidence. Christianity does not allow for dhimmitude, but Islam does.
The lack of “dhimmitude” in Christian tradition could be seen as a flaw in Christianity if you focus on the Middle Ages. Fortunately for Jews and Muslims, Christians more or less came up with dhimmitude (perhaps looking to Muslims for an example?) even though nothing in their Scriptures commanded them to tolerate unbelievers, and many things in those Scriptures indicated that unbelievers should be slaughtered wholesale (not just the OT but also Luke 19:27 and much of the Book of Revelation).

In the long run, I’m very glad that we don’t have passages enjoining dhimmitude, because the Holy Spirit has guided us to a much better conclusion–that we should not subjugate or oppress unbelievers at all. (Though some folks would argue that some things pushed for by conservative American Christians constitute a form of dhimmitude–perhaps that’s true in an extremely weak sense.) Muslims are far more “boxed in” by the cultural context of their Scriptures than we are, which contradicts the Islamic claim that the Qur’an is directly from God and independent of cultural limitation.
Therefore, Allah can’t be God.
That’s a remarkably silly argument. You are assuming that everything in Islam is the way Allah wants it. Why can’t we just say that Muslims get the will of Allah wrong at many points? Christians certainly get God’s will wrong frequently.
I might add that the ancient Egyptian god Ra was worshiped as one god at a point in history, and he would fit your apparent definition of God.
Not Ra but the Aten–the disc of the Sun. This is an imperfect form of monotheism since it seems to have been directed toward a specific physical manifestation. But insofar as it was a form of monotheism, of course it was pointing toward the one true God. I am surprised that you think this is a startling or untenable conclusion. I have no problem with the idea that Akhenaton in some sense was worshiping the true God.
The Islamic practice of dhimmitude also points out that Islam lacks a concept of the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would want to be treated.
But obviously Christians of the Middle Ages and early modern period didn’t treat heretics as they would want to be treated by people of a different faith. Christians would have defended this (St. Augustine explicitly made this argument) by saying that charity toward heretics *required *the use of force in order to bring them back to the unity of the Church. One could argue that this didn’t violate the Golden Rule because an orthodox Christian would say “if I ever fall into heresy, spare no pains to bring me back.”

Edwin
 
How can these two be the same?
You have not provided one shred of evidence for your characterizations of Islam, and your characterizations of Christianity are based on *your *interpretation of Christianity, not on the historic reality (which has at times included forced conversion, for instance).

Edwin
 
Edwin…
Please enlighten me with what u mean by those bolded words…
what are those some dirturbing elements of Christianity as a religion?
Persecution of heretics; the doctrine of eternal damnation; the slaughter of whole populations in the Old Testament; the violent imagery of the Book of Revelation; the denial of equality to women on the basis of New Testament passages; the tolerance of slavery as part of living in a fallen world (which was twisted by 19th-century Southerners into outright support for slavery); the persistent tendency of Christians to flatter governments who might be persuaded to support them and to turn a blind eye to (or even approve of) the atrocities committed by such governments; and the recurrent strain of anti-intellectualism and hostility to freedom within Christianity.
I find it rather disturbing…
You’re disturbed that I’m disturbed? Well good, we can all be disturbed togehther.

Three notes about the above list:
  1. It’s not exhaustive, just the first things that came to mind
  2. Of course these are characteristics of Christianity *as a historical religion, *which I made clear from the first. I am not saying that these are core teachings or are part of the Gospel. Some of them are simply tendencies that one can observe from time to time.
  3. “Disturbing” does not necessarily mean “bad” or “false.” It just means “disturbing.” I accept the doctrine of eternal damnation. But I find it (if you will pardon me) damned disturbing. Don’t you?
Edwin
 
Hi,
I hate to get into this debate on Christianity v/s Islam but, I dont think you have done your research on Islam.

For instance do u know that Allah is the name of a pre islamic moon god?
Allah was the name of the “high god” of the pre-Islamic Arabs. However, Allah was not a moon god. That is a slander. The origins of this urban legend appear to be that “al-ilah” was the word used by the ancient Arabs to refer to their high god (it basically means “the god”), and at least one Arab group worshiped the moon god as the supreme god and thus called him al-ilah. I get this from a fundamentalist website, so I don’t know if it’s reliable. But even if true, it underlines the fact that “al-ilah” was the general term for the supreme deity. No one has provided any evidence that the Arabs at Mecca worshiped the moon god as the supreme deity.

Edwin
 
There is good discussion going on amongst christians about Islam. Some are better informed than others about islam. Quran is a completely revealed book from God to Muhammad through the agency of the holy spirit. It is written in the Quran that Quran was revealed by the Holy Spirit (Ruh ul Quds.)

It is also written in the Quran that Jesus was aided with the Holy Spirit. ( 2:253)

It is written in the holy Quran that Jesus when in trouble called for help from his apostles. The apostles replied in affirmative. Then some people of the children of Jacob believed in Jesus and some opposed him. Allah says " We aided the believers in Jesus against their enemies and they prevailed upon their enemies." (61:14 )

We also read in the bibleNT about Father, son and the holy ghost. They are all three realities. The Father is the God i.e. Allah. The son is the man Jesus, as a messenger of Allah. The Holy Ghost is the blessed angel who brought messages to all messengers, even before Jesus.

It was alright to preach to the people in the name of Allah and in the name of Jesus and in the name of HS (Holy Spirit). No harm. In fact it was necessary to do that and Jesus had advised that. But Jesus never said that make him and the Holy Spirit as a God. That is a mistake (misunderstanding).

When some one will preach, he has to preach in the name of the One God (say Father). Then any one may ask who told you all those good words? You can say “It was taught by Jesus”. If any asked “How did Jesus get all that??” It would be necessary to mention the Holy Spirit.

So preaching in the name of Father, and son and Hoy Spirit is quite well in order. It was all necessary. We Muslims say “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” That is the same as Jesus had said “Preach in the name of father, son and the holyghost”. We preach in the name of Allah and Muhammad. But we do not make Muhammad a God. He is just a man and a servant of God.

Let there be peaceful discussion and free thinking. And when talking about love, let there be no abuse. We Muslims love Jesus and Mary and we do not believe that christians will go to hell. We do not believe that any one (non-believr in Islam) should be killed. Not at all. Let every one go on their own way peacefully. Nobody is to be killed until he picks up a sword against the good faith.

Jesus also said " Those who use the sword will be killed by the sword."

There is not to be any religious war ( Crusade= Jihad) now. That is real Islam.
 
In this one statement you have provided the evidence. Christianity does not allow for dhimmitude, but Islam does. Therefore, Allah can’t be God.
Conclusion does not follow from the premises. Can you provide a second premise and write it as a valid syllogism? I don’t even know how you could do this, since you already have four terms. It is possible to worship God in a mistaken manner, or to have bad theology.
 
One could argue that this didn’t violate the Golden Rule because an orthodox Christian would say “if I ever fall into heresy, spare no pains to bring me back.”

Edwin
And as an orthodox Catholic Christian, I DO say that.
 
You have not provided one shred of evidence for your characterizations of Islam, and your characterizations of Christianity are based on *your *interpretation of Christianity, not on the historic reality (which has at times included forced conversion, for instance).

Edwin
I would like to qualify this however - and I think Edwin will agree with me - that there is a “true Christianity” which may have not always been practiced historically, since Christianity is the true, revealed religion. You can’t say this of Islam.

So for Islam, we see forced conversions in some places and tolerance in others. Both are equally valid Islam.

In Christianity, the Catholic Church has quite clearly condemned forced conversions. So we must lament the actions of St. Olaf in Norway and King Sisebut in Visigothic Spain when they attempted to force baptism on their subjects (and Sisebut was condemned at the time by a local council, btw).
 
There is good discussion going on amongst christians about Islam. Some are better informed than others about islam. Quran is a completely revealed book from God to Muhammad through the agency of the holy spirit. It is written in the Quran that Quran was revealed by the Holy Spirit (Ruh ul Quds.)

It is also written in the Quran that Jesus was aided with the Holy Spirit. ( 2:253)

It is written in the holy Quran that Jesus when in trouble called for help from his apostles. The apostles replied in affirmative. Then some people of the children of Jacob believed in Jesus and some opposed him. Allah says " We aided the believers in Jesus against their enemies and they prevailed upon their enemies." (61:14 )

We also read in the bibleNT about Father, son and the holy ghost. They are all three realities. The Father is the God i.e. Allah. The son is the man Jesus, as a messenger of Allah. The Holy Ghost is the blessed angel who brought messages to all messengers, even before Jesus.

It was alright to preach to the people in the name of Allah and in the name of Jesus and in the name of HS (Holy Spirit). No harm. In fact it was necessary to do that and Jesus had advised that. But Jesus never said that make him and the Holy Spirit as a God. That is a mistake (misunderstanding).

When some one will preach, he has to preach in the name of the One God (say Father). Then any one may ask who told you all those good words? You can say “It was taught by Jesus”. If any asked “How did Jesus get all that??” It would be necessary to mention the Holy Spirit.

So preaching in the name of Father, and son and Hoy Spirit is quite well in order. It was all necessary. We Muslims say “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” That is the same as Jesus had said “Preach in the name of father, son and the holyghost”. We preach in the name of Allah and Muhammad. But we do not make Muhammad a God. He is just a man and a servant of God.

Let there be peaceful discussion and free thinking. And when talking about love, let there be no abuse. We Muslims love Jesus and Mary and we do not believe that christians will go to hell. We do not believe that any one (non-believr in Islam) should be killed. Not at all. Let every one go on their own way peacefully. Nobody is to be killed until he picks up a sword against the good faith.

Jesus also said " Those who use the sword will be killed by the sword."

There is not to be any religious war ( Crusade= Jihad) now. That is real Islam.
Planten, obviously we disagree as to whether the Koran is revealed and as to whether Jesus and the Holy Spirit are consubstantial with the Father (Allah). That is the difference between Christians and Muslims. Let me simply note that in the Koran the Trinity is portrayed as being “Jesus, Mary, and Allah” - which it probably was for those heretics that it is referring to - and that Jesus never claimed that His mother is divine. However, the historical record is quite clear on Christ’s claim to be one with the Father - it is attested by ancient manuscripts of the Gospels (going back to the 1st century AD) and by contemporary pagan Roman and Jewish authors (Josephus). Also note that during the Arian debates three hundred years later, no “authentic” translation of the Gospels was ever produced - the text argued on was the same as the one we have now.
 
Planten, obviously we disagree as to whether the Koran is revealed and as to whether Jesus and the Holy Spirit are consubstantial with the Father (Allah). That is the difference between Christians and Muslims. Let me simply note that in the Koran the Trinity is portrayed as being “Jesus, Mary, and Allah” - which it probably was for those heretics that it is referring to - and that Jesus never claimed that His mother is divine. However, the historical record is quite clear on Christ’s claim to be one with the Father - it is attested by ancient manuscripts of the Gospels (going back to the 1st century AD) and by contemporary pagan Roman and Jewish authors (Josephus). Also note that during the Arian debates three hundred years later, no “authentic” translation of the Gospels was ever produced - the text argued on was the same as the one we have now.
**Cecilianus, thanks for the reply. I had explained the Islamic view on the subject. Please note that Quran does not say Trinity is father, son and Mary. It simply says that some christian people were worshipping Jesus and his mother. That does not mean trinity. What Quran said is true even today. Some christians pray to Mary and Jesus, i.e. they worship them.
On last day Allah will ask Jesus if he taught such a thing. That is all mentioned in the Quran. The quran never said that Trinity comprised of Father, Son and Mary. Jesus will deny that he told any one to worship him.

Your next point: We Muslims also believe that Jesus is One with God. That is true. But you people read too much between the lines. When it pleases the christians, they take literal meaning of things, such as father and son and begotten son etc. But when it is said that Jesus had other brothers and sisters, they say “No. It means cousins.”

We understand that Jesus was one with God and we believe that.

Also, some christian friends complained about the hue and cry raised by the Muslims all over the wold when some Pope accused Muhammad… Please note that Muslims will raise the voice even if some bad thing was said about Jesus. Muslims do not like that men of God be abused.**
 
Some christians pray to Mary and Jesus, i.e. they worship them.

Planten, “praying to” Mary is not worshiping her; we are merely asking for her intercession before God. We believe that all the saved are made into a family - a “body”, used in a mystical sense - through God’s grace. So we pray for each other. Muslims also have a long tradition of praying to saints, especially Mary (Sayyidna Maryam); the Muslims’ love for Mary puts our Protestant brethren to shame. In Mary’s last home in Ephesus, there is a prayer room set aside for the Muslim pilgrims, alongside the Christian church there.

But all Christians worship Jesus, because He is God.
Your next point: We Muslims also believe that Jesus is One with God. That is true. But you people read too much between the lines. When it pleases the christians, they take literal meaning of things, such as father and son and begotten son etc. But when it is said that Jesus had other brothers and sisters, they say “No. It means cousins.”
I’m not sure what incident you’re referring to, unless you mean the Regensburg Address in which Mohammed wasn’t even mentioned and the supposed criticism of Islam was in the middle of a quote (which the Pope then criticized) which was taken out of context by the secular media. I know that Muslims rush to defend Jesus; in America, they’re often the only ones any more.😦
 
I have a feeling that this thread is going disintegrate into a fury of arguments and harsh words but I pray not…

I became Catholic in 2007 after a year of RCIA. I have struggled to be the best Catholic I could be, I studied theology like crazy, I went to Mass, and I followed God.

I have to say that I am impressed with Islam, very very impressed. The Qur’an is like a beautiful ray of light. Muhammad (pbuh) is a wonderful example. The Muslims I know follow Christ’s example better than most Catholics, they are more peaceful and loving than I thought possible. Their devotion to God is absolute. And the evidence for Islam is piling up for me. I know many here have negative opinions about Islam, Muslims, and the Prophet Muhammad and I did too once but now that I have put a lot of time into studying the religion and talking to many people, I have discovered the true Islam. True Islam is not the fanatical religion of the media nor is it a woman-hating, gun-toting, violent mockery of religion as I had been taught. It very well might be the most peaceful faith on earth. God is in Islam, I can’t deny it any longer. Believe me I’ve tried!
I love the Church, but God has led me to Her and God may be leading me to Islam. I am willing to put everything else aside to follow God where He wills, even if I must put aside my beloved Mother Church. I will submit to God in all things, He will lead me where He wills.

I hesitate to ask…thoughts?

please keep it civil

pax vobiscum
Irish
Dear IRish Dude,

God is not leading you anywhere. Your emotions are leading you. You are not a Catholic anyway since I have heard nothing about Jesus in you post. God does not lead his people in all these directions. His Son made one Church, not one Mosque, and not one Temple…

Make your choice if you want to and do not think for one second that God is leading you away from his Son. Also, don’t judge the Catholics by your personal inability to follow Jesus. Stop abusing the 8th Commandment by making false accusations about Catholics. Yes, there are many lukewarm Catholics. They will be judged by Jesus at the Final Judgment, just like you and me. There are a tremendous amount of Holy Catholics.

There are Holy Moslems, but don’t dare state that there are only wonderfully holy Moslems. That’s not really using your faith in a Christian way. There are as many lukewarm Moslems as there are lukewarm Catholics.

Make your choice and keep God out of it because you are not guided by God but by your emotions only. Don’t fool yourself.

If you find this harsh, you don’t know waht harsh is.

jpaul1953
An Irish Catholic
 
Dear IRish Dude,

God is not leading you anywhere. Your emotions are leading you. You are not a Catholic anyway since I have heard nothing about Jesus in you post. God does not lead his people in all these directions. His Son made one Church, not one Mosque, and not one Temple…
Holy cow! Physician, heal thyself - who are you to say that IrishDude is “not a Catholic anyway”? Have you never experienced temptation - or do you somehow think that the temptations you undergo are somehow purer or better than his? What do you think that spiritual direction and the sacrament of Penance are for? Is it apostasy to ask, in charity, for spiritual help on a place like this?

When people are spiritually sick - and we are all spiritually sick, from both temptation and sin - don’t grow angry with them when they look for help. I don’t care if you’re working miracles - if you hath not charity, it availeth nothing. This kind of example does not save sinners. I would not blame IrishDude if this disgusting spectacle was the final straw that pushed him out of the Church and into the mosque. May God be more merciful to him than you are.

By the way, read his post which you quoted. You will find a reference to Jesus.
 
The Holy Ghost is the blessed angel who brought messages to all messengers, even before Jesus.
Never is the Holy Ghost referred to as an angel.

.
But Jesus never said that make him and the Holy Spirit as a God.
Daniel 7:13-14 [13] "In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. [14] He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all peoples, nations and men of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
It refers to Jesus’s kingdom.
John 10:31-33 [31] Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, [32] but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?” [33] “We are not stoning you for any of these,” replied the Jews, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”
Now, they are obviously false in asserting He isn’t God. The point is that that’s apparently what he was saying
 
AsSalum o Aleikum to you Brother Planten,

In you post you say
Some christians pray to Mary and Jesus, i.e. they worship them.
I guess this may be true in some cases, but my understanding of the Catholic church is that worship and prayer is different.

Is that not the same in Islamic religion, is not the beginning of all prayers worship by statement and recitation and only at the very end make dua / prayer / supplication.

Difference being in all worship and prayer is to Allah and Him alone.
In Catholic all worship is to G-d alone and prayer is to entities they believe are in right relationship with G-d.

I dont think that Catholics are prohibited from praying to Allah as Jesus (pbwh) taught it is just that they have other teachers.

I have no authority to speak for Catholics and Muslims you are all welcome to correct me.

Hi Cecilianus you say
“God is spirit”
Isn’t that a bit narrow I would say He is more as He created spirit beings and physical creation. Did spirit create spirit?

Or is God both seen and unseen.

If there is the unseen aspect of God then how do you know it is spirit?

You also say “we believe” is “we” the same “we” that say the Muslims and Catholics adore the same God and you now agree this is true?

Or did you mean they and I?

jpaul1953
An Irish Catholic come on, your assertion bashes popes past who have spoken of Muslims, swing your sword on Irish Dude and the blade points at those also.
Be careful then for the sword of truth has two edges.
Slay those popes and you cut down those who say they have authority to speak for Catholics.
Separate your self not from those My Father wants you to be with.

Hi Tim5
Never is the Holy Ghost referred to as an angel.
this is difference in narrations for Muslims.
The Quran says like (not quote) Jesus was helped with the pure spirit. then is narrated oft as this being Gabriel.

Hmm
Now, they are obviously false in asserting He isn’t God. The point is that that’s apparently what he was saying
Obvious false hood from apparent saying???

Be blessed be guided, seekers of living truth
 
We also read in the bibleNT about Father, son and the holy ghost. They are all three realities. The Father is the God i.e. Allah. The son is the man Jesus, as a messenger of Allah. The Holy Ghost is the blessed angel who brought messages to all messengers, even before Jesus.
It was alright to preach to the people in the name of Allah and in the name of Jesus and in the name of HS (Holy Spirit). No harm. In fact it was necessary to do that and Jesus had advised that. But Jesus never said that make him and the Holy Spirit as a God. That is a mistake (misunderstanding).

When some one will preach, he has to preach in the name of the One God (say Father). Then any one may ask who told you all those good words? You can say “It was taught by Jesus”. If any asked “How did Jesus get all that??” It would be necessary to mention the Holy Spirit.

So preaching in the name of Father, and son and Hoy Spirit is quite well in order. It was all necessary. We Muslims say “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” That is the same as Jesus had said “Preach in the name of father, son and the holyghost”. We preach in the name of Allah and Muhammad. But we do not make Muhammad a God. He is just a man and a servant of God.

Once again, I need to point out that the Holy Spirit is God, NOT the Angel Gabriel. I realize that in Muslim theology you/they refer to the Angel Gabriel as the Holy Spirit, but in Christian theology the Holy Spirit is, was and always shall be God. The Holy Spirit in Christian theology does not refer to and has nothing to do with the Angel Gabriel.
 
Hi Cecilianus you say
“God is spirit”
Isn’t that a bit narrow I would say He is more as He created spirit beings and physical creation. Did spirit create spirit?

Or is God both seen and unseen.

If there is the unseen aspect of God then how do you know it is spirit?
In a word, yes. Whatever I say of God - that He is good, or that He is, or that He is spirit - is said “eminently” to use Thomist parlance; that is, every adjective or predicate I apply to Him is true in a much higher sense than the finite way in which it exists in creatures. He is spirit because He is the cause of spiritual beings, and lacks the limitations of matter.

Yes, God is both seen and unseen; I take this to mean (following St. Dionysious’ Mystical Theology) that everything created is like God insofar as they are created by and resemble Him, and in this sense everything can be said of God; likewise, nothing can be said of God insofar as He is infinitely above everything. So all the words we use to talk about God - “good”, “spirit”, “one”, etc. - are apophatic symbols. I think this is what St. Thomas meant by the “analogy of being”.

God is also the cause of matter, but (with all due respect to certain theologians, the poet John Milton among them) I don’t think we should refer to God as “material”; that conveys certain bodily and physical characteristics in Him which would be false. But “spirit” is the highest thing that we know, so that’s what we call God.
You also say “we believe” is “we” the same “we” that say the Muslims and Catholics adore the same God and you now agree this is true?
Or did you mean they and I?
I’m not sure I understood your question; by “we” I happened to only be referring to Catholics (although if Muslims happen to believe those things too, then great!).

And of course, I believe that Muslims and Catholics worship the same God - “Allah” means God in Arabic, so if they say they worship God I don’t see any reason to doubt that. Especially since any theology must take place within an apophatic context for Christians (and doubtless for Muslims too), I don’t know what the criteria are for worshiping God versus an idol if your theology is flawed. I think that’s why heresy is considered a sin against the 1st Commandment - it is in some way substituting your own view of God for the living and (apophatically, not agnostically) unknowable God. But bad theology still consists of incorrect statements concerning the same God.

Besides the arguments from reason, the Church teaches that Muslims worship the God of Abraham (however misguided they might happen to be in their manner of worship and subscription to a false revelation), and I accept whatever the Church teaches (I am a Catholic 😛 :D).
 
and I accept whatever the Church teaches (I am a Catholic ).
please forgive me for challenging this i had you mixed with another poster

God bless u and again sorry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top