Catholic High School student fights teacher on truth of the Resurrection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pax_et_Bonum
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m done with you .I think that you enjoy being a skeptic who has to get the last word.What gives anything in any newspaper validity?
I consider Lifesitenews the pro-life version of the National Enquirer. CatholicTV is mostly commentary.
You’ve painted yourself in a corner and you can’t find a way out.
There is no corner to be painted into. The facts are not in question, its the conclusions people are drawing.
So you attack the validity which has already been proven.Do you believe the world is flat or do you question the spherical shape validity thingie?
Once again, I haven’t disputed that the girl claims to have head a denial of the resurrection. What’s in question is whether she heard him accurately, misunderstood him, or just plain made it up.
Once again, I fail to see why many are automatically assuming the girls and right and all the other people in the story are wrong.
 
You didn’t even address the point where you said it couldn’t have been printed by Lifesite and I embarrassed you by showing you Lifesite did publish it in post number one which you very obviously did not read.In trying to save face that’s the best ya got?
Sigh. You need to do a better job of following the thread. What I said was that if the teacher addressed the class after the article was printed I doubt Lifesitenews would have printed it. I never stated Lifesitenews didn’t cover the original story.
I don’t need to save face and you can’t embarrass me by countering something I never said. Nice try though…:rolleyes:
 
I did misunderstand the context of "For starters, I doubt lifesitenews would report it."For that I apologize.

I choose to believe Francesca,her friend Celine who supports the contention that her teacher did say that and her mother who is supporting her daughter.

My son attends Catholic High School in Ontario and one of the religion teachers became or was a Fundamentalist and was teaching heresy.After an investigation he was fired.(Do you require validation for that?)

I do NOT find her story far fetched.You believe what you want.I could care less. 80 per cent of the teachers are CINOs and we’ve had conversions simply to increase eligibility for employment.As an American you have no idea of the inanity that goes on in Ontario Catholic schools.

Whether you consider Michael Voris a valid source is moot.Tens of thousands do.
 
My son attends Catholic High School in Ontario and one of the religion teachers became or was a Fundamentalist and was teaching heresy.After an investigation he was fired.(Do you require validation for that?)
The school did an investigation and came to a conclusion. Obviously everyone was in agreement in that situation. That’s not the case here.
 
The school did an investigation and came to a conclusion. Obviously everyone was in agreement in that situation. That’s not the case here.
Obviously and that is why it warrants more than an in-house cover your butt investigation.I’ve worked in bureaucracies all my life and have seen my fair share of coverups to avoid adverse publicity.

Like I said I could not care less what you choose or do not choose to believe but I find it difficult to believe that this girl is not telling the truth especially after hearing heresy and Church-of-the-Self taught in RCIA programs,with my own ears while participating as an instructor

I was instrumental in having two people removed from RCIA-one for telling students that Christ did not really perform the miracle of Loaves and Fishes but because he was such a nice guy everyone shared the food they brought.The other stated that the congregation confected the Eucharist and not the priest and he had no more authority than any other parishoner,and that female priests were inevitable.By the way she denied saying this to our Parish Priest,when I informed him as I caused a ruckus in the program.The Priest asked the two RCIA candidates(curious that there are two witnesses here not much older than the young women at the High School)who confirmed my contention and canned her butt.She subsequently left the Parish.(Do you want that validated too?)

To witness heresy at RCIA from Catholics picked as instructors because of their Faith and Knowledge is shocking beyond belief.To hear of heresy taught at a Catholic High School,not so much.

Like I said believe what you want.Your opinion and 10$ can buy you a latte + at Starbucks
 
Why?She is accusing him of proselytizing heresy.What does sexual misconduct have to do with it?
The common ground is the accusation. The other common groung is that if it turns over that the accusation had no merit, the accuser will not be punished.
 
Obviously and that is why it warrants more than an in-house cover your butt investigation.I’ve worked in bureaucracies all my life and have seen my fair share of coverups to avoid adverse publicity.
So that means anytime a decision comes out that you don’t like you automatically assume there’s a coverup?
Like I said I could not care less what you choose or do not choose to believe but I find it difficult to believe that this girl is not telling the truth especially after hearing heresy and Church-of-the-Self taught in RCIA programs,with my own ears while participating as an instructor
So when one person somewhere does something wrong that automatically means a completely different person in another place must be guilty?
The Priest asked the two RCIA candidates(curious that there are two witnesses here not much older than the young women at the High School)who confirmed my contention and canned her butt.She subsequently left the Parish.(Do you want that validated too?)
Apparently the priest didn’t simply take your word for it, he had it validated by other people in the class.
Like I said believe what you want.Your opinion and 10$ can buy you a latte + at Starbucks
Its the same with your opinion, so I guess that leaves us back where we started.
 
Believe or disbelieve it does not matter to me and your absolute denials and dismissal of two Catholic news sources that YOU do not accept as being viable is boring and gee, conveniently supports your argument.
 
Believe or disbelieve it does not matter to me and your absolute denials and dismissal of two Catholic news sources that YOU do not accept as being viable is boring and gee, conveniently supports your argument.
Sorry but this is a complete red herring. I did not dispute any of the facts reported. I don’t know why you think saying “Lifesitenews and CatholicTV reported it!” means anything. All they reported was an allegation by two teenagers. I acknowledge and accept that two teenagers have accused a teacher of denying the resurrection.
If those two “news” agencies choose to accept the girls’ allegations, that is their commentary but is ultimately meaningless. As you have said, their opinion and $10 can buy them a latte at Starbucks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top