Catholics and Non-Catholics: Do you believe in the Perpetual Virginity of the Blessed Mother?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lax16
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d love to be corrected. Please show me where you think I’ve been arrogant and if I’ve been that I’ll apologize.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrogance?show=0&t=1284916247

ar·ro·gance noun \ˈer-ə-gən(t)s, ˈa-rə-
Definition of ARROGANCE
: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions

I think you’ll be hard pressed because I know I’m superior to anyone. The only real thing I presume to be correct is that I could be wrong.

But I’m open to your post revealing I am arrogant.
So you admit to being arrogant:D
 
I not sure “exactly” what information you are looking for “historically”.

But I can go right back to Jesus Christ with “The Roman Catholic Church”. The Popes alone tell that story.

Jesus assigned to Peter the responsibility of establishing the Christian church. Peter traveled to Rome where he was the first pope. At his death, his work was continued by a continuous succession of popes. The 1st century CE popes were: St. Peter (30 to 67 CE, approximately)

Linus ( 67 to 76)

Cletus (76 to 88)

Clement of Rome (88 to 97)

etc…and we arrive at Pope Beneidict
 
Unkindness isn’t equal with arrogance.

Well I have good company with you. I hope you make me feel welcome.😃
Do you think arrogance is worst? I would have said that arrogance isn’t equal with unkindness but… I assume what you meant is that they don’t mean the same thing? Perhaps. not. At any rate I agree with all the statements.

The charge that the Catholic Church started 300 years after Jesus is an anti-catholic slur. It has no basis in fact or history.
 
Sure if I had purposely lets the word ‘not’ out.

[SIGN]I think you’ll be hard pressed because I know I’m NOT superior to anyone.[/SIGN]
I couldn’t help teasing you a bit. Should have put a smile in it. 😃 If I can edit I will do so now.
 
Elivs, I apologize if I’ve missed your rebutals.

Please restate the open issue and I will respond
**Give me some evidence to substantiate your claims about the Chuch not coming into existence until the 3rd or 4th century. **

So far - Doki hasn’t been able to.
 
Your rhetoric will not get me to dance to your music. You know how to get all the info you need to get an apposing view to the one you hold. You’ve most likely already read much of the information and no doubt rejected it.

Please don’t waste your time asking or commenting. It will be meaningless.
Doki -
**As with every other post that we’ve debated each other on - you always come up short in the evidence department. You’re full of vitriole against the Church and make all sorts of ludicrous claims - but when I call you on them and ask you to provide some proof, you get defensive and tell me to find my own proof.

Demanding that somebody to prove YOUR claims is even more preposterous than the false claim itself.

Now - if you want to continue this conversation - show some proof of your claims. I eagrly await your informative response . . .
 
Do you think arrogance is worst? I would have said that arrogance isn’t equal with unkindness but… I assume what you meant is that they don’t mean the same thing? Perhaps. not. At any rate I agree with all the statements.

The charge that the Catholic Church started 300 years after Jesus is an anti-catholic slur. It has no basis in fact or history.
And if Doki feels that it does have basis in fact, then he should have no problem providing some proof for this claim.

I’m all ears . . .
 
And just remember, when “anyone” should ask what you did today. Don’t forget to mention to them you were hanging out with your Bro’s on the “CATHOLIC” forum.😃
 
I not sure “exactly” what information you are looking for “historically”.

But I can go right back to Jesus Christ with “The Roman Catholic Church”. The Popes alone tell that story.

Jesus assigned to Peter the responsibility of establishing the Christian church. Peter traveled to Rome where he was the first pope. At his death, his work was continued by a continuous succession of popes. The 1st century CE popes were: St. Peter (30 to 67 CE, approximately)

Linus ( 67 to 76)

Cletus (76 to 88)

Clement of Rome (88 to 97)

etc…and we arrive at Pope Beneidict
I’m sure if you follow the writings of your church, you can follow your history right back to Peter and Jesus.

What’s the difference between you and our Mormon friends? They do the same. They get their info indirectly directly from Jesus who was on this continent. Jesus told them as you say He told you.

I’ll stick with the Bible, thank you very much. God bless.
 
Thats OK, be carefull you don’t end up like that Christian Cult in Southern Cal.😦
 
Do you think arrogance is worst? I would have said that arrogance isn’t equal with unkindness but… I assume what you meant is that they don’t mean the same thing? Perhaps. not. At any rate I agree with all the statements.

The charge that the Catholic Church started 300 years after Jesus is an anti-catholic slur. It has no basis in fact or history.
Arrogance is worse; it makes one or one’s beliefs better in their own imagination than others.

If I believe correctly, I am greatful to God who showed me by opening my blind eyes. The things I get wrong, I pray God opens my eyes.

Arrogance is hard to stop. Unkindness is not so hard to change. IM (not-so-humble) O.
 
I’m sure if you follow the writings of your church, you can follow your history right back to Peter and Jesus.

What’s the difference between you and our Mormon friends? They do the same. They get their info indirectly directly from Jesus who was on this continent. Jesus told them as you say He told you.

I’ll stick with the Bible, thank you very much. God bless.
Great - then that means, you’ll have to stick with the Catholic Church, who wrote, compiled and declared the canon of the Bible. 👍

By the way - were you ever going to give us some proof that the Catholic Church didn’t materialize until the 3rd or 4th century? After all - if you state something as fact, you should be prepared to back it up . . . :rolleyes:
 
**Give me some evidence **to substantiate your claims about the Chuch not coming into existence until the 3rd or 4th century.

So far - Doki hasn’t been able to.
Do your own homework if you truly care. Don’t take the easy way out. The easy way out is to let me make any statement and then you try to destroy what I’ve said based on your beliefs.

Do your own homework to show you really want to read an alternative view of history. Don’t cop out on yourself.
 
**Doki **-
As with every other post that we’ve debated each other on - you *always *come up short in the evidence department. You’re full of vitriole against the Church and make all sorts of ludicrous claims - but when I call you on them and ask you to provide some proof, you get defensive and tell me to find my own proof.

Demanding that somebody to prove YOUR claims is even more preposterous than the false claim itself.

Now - if you want to continue this conversation - show some proof of your claims. I eagrly await your informative response . . .
Already gave my answer in my last post.

Let me add, don’t hold your breath.
 
Arrogance is worse; it makes one or one’s beliefs better in their own imagination than others.

If I believe correctly, I am greatful to God who showed me by opening my blind eyes. The things I get wrong, I pray God opens my eyes.

Arrogance is hard to stop. Unkindness is not so hard to change. IM (not-so-humble) O.
Hey Bro, let me tell something for real all jokes aside. You will find humility in this life. Trust Me on this one. God brings us all to that, all in good time my friend.
 
Do your own homework if you truly care. Don’t take the easy way out. The easy way out is to let me make any statement and then you try to destroy what I’ve said based on your beliefs.

Do your own homework to show you really want to read an alternative view of history. Don’t cop out on yourself.
Demanding that I do your homework again, eh?

Give me some evidence to substantiate your claims about the Chuch not coming into existence until the 3rd or 4th century.
 
Great - then that means, you’ll have to stick with the Catholic Church, who wrote, compiled and declared the canon of the Bible. 👍

By the way - were you ever going to give us some proof that the Catholic Church didn’t materialize until the 3rd or 4th century? After all - if you state something as fact, you should be prepared to back it up . . . :rolleyes:
yawn
 
Already gave my answer in my last post.

Let me add, don’t hold your breath.
Not lettin’ you off the hook this time, Doki.

**Give me some evidence to substantiate your claims about the Chuch not coming into existence until the 3rd or 4th century. **
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top