A
At_Trent
Guest
No, it’s true.Oh come on. Really! LOL.
No one forces their opinion on anyone unless they are cult experts
No, it’s true.Oh come on. Really! LOL.
Wait, I’m confused. I thought you disagreed that parents make the call ?
If we as Catholics do our best to teach our children – what is right – they would be less likely to fall into the type of behavior – you describe above. Creating a bunker mentality --segregating the family from society – can lead to individuals that lack the necessary skills to function within society.
Walking_Home:![]()
– wouldn’t you say. For ex. Jim Jones.That is the reason - why children end up in cults
Absolutely. Every parent who did it their way created a monster. Your word is proof. You ought to write a book.
Walking_Home:![]()
Wait, I’m confused. I thought you disagreed that parents make the call ?If we as Catholics do our best to teach our children – what is right – they would be less likely to fall into the type of behavior – you describe above. Creating a bunker mentality --segregating the family from society – can lead to individuals that lack the necessary skills to function within society.
You have all SSPX families under some kind of surveillance ?
Well of course.A 13 year old is far from being an adult. Yes, they need and want (whether they realise that or not) boundaries and rules. However, we start teaching them from young so they can deal with situations which they will have to handle as we cannot be there for them all the time.
Parents have a right to raise their children as they see fit.
Parents need to teach children starting from a young age --but I do not believe that creating a bunker mentality --and withdrawing from society – is a healthy way to go about it.
Well of course.
I just don’t understand what is wrong with a parent not letting boys and girls play with each other necessarily.
This is addressed more to WalkingHome, but are all girl and all boy schools dysfunctional?
Parents have a right to raise their children as they see fit.
see a shrink
see post 79.
So are you saying some members of the SSPX do not allow any mingling at all? I really have no idea if that’s the case or not.
TrueLight – I am under the impression that with the all girl and all boy schools --students still have the opportunity to socialize with the opposite sex.
So are you saying some members of the SSPX do not allow any mingling at all? I really have no idea if that’s the case or not.
Actually, single sex schools try to provide ample opportunity for social interaction between the genders. We ran a boys school, until our General Minister closed it down, because Franciscans are not to teach except at universities. Anyway, there were dances, school plays, special days such as field days that were held together with the Visitandine nuns’ girl school. There were also many social ministries that the kids did, such as the hospital, shelter and soup kitchen.
TrueLight – I am under the impression that with the all girl and all boy schools --students still have the opportunity to socialize with the opposite sex.
I would imagine that these are folks who are sympathetic to the SSPX, but are not the norm. The only person in the SSPX whom I have ever heard discriminate between males and females is Bishop Williamson and most people disagree with him on most of his points concerning that subject. He’s the one who feels that women should not get a college education. My guess is that they don’t have teaching sisters in the Anglican Church or nursing sisters. I say this, because he is a convert who would not have been educated by our sisters.So are you saying some members of the SSPX do not allow any mingling at all? I really have no idea if that’s the case or not.
One can watch the news these days and get messed up in the head.
I assume you’re a New Yorker, no?I don’t know which kids you are around, but the kids in the City are dating in elementary school. And by dating, I mean at least tongue kissing with hands roaming. And some of the girls are having oral sex.
And it only stops there because the boys’ bodies are not ready to do more. Once they hit puberty at 11-13, they begin to do more.
Yes, I’m as NY’er.When I was little I had more friends who were girls than friends who were guys (and I’m a guy, for the record). No ‘destruction of innocence’ occurred. We ran around, played tag, jumped on the monkey bars, went on the play structure. Nothing sinful happened. Even thinking about it makes me feel dirty!
I don’t even think there’s anything wrong with them interacting as teenagers. Just keep an eye on them and be aware.
I assume you’re a New Yorker, no?
Anyway, it’s no longer in the City. In my suburban public elementary school (West Coast) the same things happened. Sometimes it was out in the open, such as during recess and on the school grounds after school got out. I remember in the 7th Grade my Math teacher and my Principal gave a stern lecture to us not to be kissing each other in front of everybody’s parents. But I don’t remember hearing about anybody going further than kissing before I was in the 8th Grade (which, nevertheless, is way to early for obvious reasons).
Just a little interjection. It bothers me that many of the Catholic High Schools in my area sit in their ivory tower and say ‘Our students don’t do those things’ when they do and are just not as open about it as at the Public High Schools. But this and other problems in Catholic education (or lack thereof) are another topic for another time… Anyway, I just needed to get some steam out.
Actually, single sex schools try to provide ample opportunity for social interaction between the genders. We ran a boys school, until our General Minister closed it down, because Franciscans are not to teach except at universities. Anyway, there were dances, school plays, special days such as field days that were held together with the Visitandine nuns’ girl school. There were also many social ministries that the kids did, such as the hospital, shelter and soup kitchen.
We encouraged the parents to find activities for the boys to do with girls as a family and in their neighborhood. It is important for boys and girls to see each other as partners in problem solving, as friends, and as equally responsible for the world in which they live.
**I would imagine that these are folks who are sympathetic to the SSPX, but are not the norm. The only person in the SSPX whom I have ever heard discriminate between males and females is Bishop Williamson and most people disagree with him on most of his points concerning that subject. He’s the one who feels that women should not get a college education. ** My guess is that they don’t have teaching sisters in the Anglican Church or nursing sisters. I say this, because he is a convert who would not have been educated by our sisters.
But among Catholics we have never had that degree of segregation. Just look at religious orders. Almost every religious community has a male and female counterpart and they work very closely.
In order of foundation.
Benedictine monks - Benedictine nuns - Benedictine sisters
Franciscan Friars - Poor Clare nuns - Franciscan sisters
Dominican nuns - Dominican Friars - Dominican sisters
Carmelite Friars - Carmelite nuns - Discalced Carmelite nuns - Discalced Carmelite Friars - Carmelite sisters
Vincentian Fathers and Brothers - Daughters of Charity
Visitandine nuns - Salesian Fathers and Brothers
Missionary of Charisty Sisters - Missionary of Charity Brothers
And the list goes on and on.
There was a time when most diocesan parishes had teams of diocesan priests and religious sisters and most schools were co-ed, only high schools were segregated. There were very few segregated elementary schools.
The Salesians and the Christian Brothers started to segregate boys and girls in the lower grades. That was because the Salesian Oratories were originally for homeless boys. The Christian Brothers were founded to educate poor boys and there never was a female counterpart to the Christian Brothers or to the Jesuits. The Salesians did have a femal counterpart, Daughters of Mary Help of Christians aka Salesian Sisters.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF![]()
When I was little I had more friends who were girls than friends who were guys (and I’m a guy, for the record). No ‘destruction of innocence’ occurred. We ran around, played tag, jumped on the monkey bars, went on the play structure. Nothing sinful happened. Even thinking about it makes me feel dirty!
I don’t even think there’s anything wrong with them interacting as teenagers. Just keep an eye on them and be aware.
I agree with you. Interaction is good. I played with both girls and boys when I was young and it was all vvery innocent. If you start keeping kids apart from young talking about sin, in my opinion, you are taking away their innocence in a way.
whether he/she was raised by SSPX parents ?
Well – it depends on the mental health of the individual.