R
Rich_Olszewski
Guest
Like Ham and Eggs: A day’s work for a hen; a lifetime commitment for a pig. Same with a Chick-Fil-A chicken - a life’s commitment.I don’t know. Did you ask the chicken?![]()
Like Ham and Eggs: A day’s work for a hen; a lifetime commitment for a pig. Same with a Chick-Fil-A chicken - a life’s commitment.I don’t know. Did you ask the chicken?![]()
Before or after it is cooked?Do you think it would feel better being thrown in the ocean?
Lol…there is no discrimination by the company. The complaint is of a family no longer comfortable going to Chick-fil-A because of the CEO’s comments. I hope even those in favor gay “marriage” will agree the complaint is ridiculous.
For such enlightened people, some of you can’t seem to follow the simple logic. So again, the issue isn’t a boycott.This whole thing seems really… petty. Remember the Oreo controversy? When Oreo posted a picture of an Oreo with rainbow filling and tons of Christian groups freaked out? Yeah, then it was an attack on Christian values, and now suddenly Chick-fil-a’s stance is “free speech”. Huh, ironic, isn’t it?
Regardless of what you kind people think about my marriage, as a gay atheist, I have no obligation to follow your version of morality as dictated by the “Holy” Bible (just as you don’t follow the Qu’ran like those in the Islamic faith.) I’m still going to move on with my life, marry a man, and grow a family (either through adoption or surrogacy). Enjoy your chicken, I’m busy planning my future.
If they are uncomfortable going there, then don’t go there. Pretty easy solution if you ask me. Plenty of places to get chicken.Lol…there is no discrimination by the company. The complaint is of a family no longer comfortable going to Chick-fil-A because of the CEO’s comments. I hope even those in favor gay “marriage” will agree the complaint is ridiculous.![]()
I wonder if I can sue a gay bar because I would be uncomfortable going there?Lol…there is no discrimination by the company. The complaint is of a family no longer comfortable going to Chick-fil-A because of the CEO’s comments. I hope even those in favor gay “marriage” will agree the complaint is ridiculous.![]()
Don’t encourage them - particularly in your first post here.Blapshemous jokes from the “tolerance” community incoming in five… four… three…
Satan encourages them enough I’m afraid…Don’t encourage them - particularly in your first post here.![]()
How does one tell if the crowds on Wednesday were 1. pro-family, 2, pro-traditional marriage, or 3. just hungry for a chicken sandwich.I asked up thread, but will again. What are the size of these crowds compared to the pro-family ones?
Thanks!
I prefer not to talk to my food.I don’t know. Did you ask the chicken?
Peace
Tim
Oh c’mon Rich. One restaurant’s record was 1400ish. They served 2500ish.How does one tell if the crowds on Wednesday were 1. pro-family, 2, pro-traditional marriage, or 3. just hungry for a chicken sandwich.
Option 1 and 2 are not the same. Some couples are childless by choice, but believe in traditional marriage.
Therefore, you’d have to have a headcount of the pro-family group to even start answering your question.
Well, we know that there were many more people that patronized Chik-fil-A on Wednesday than on a typical Wednesday. Perhaps you know something that the rest of America doesn’t as to why the crowds were so big. Maybe there was just a massive, wide-spread craving for chicken and waffle fries, but I don’t think so.How does one tell if the crowds on Wednesday were 1. pro-family, 2, pro-traditional marriage, or 3. just hungry for a chicken sandwich.
Option 1 and 2 are not the same. Some couples are childless by choice, but believe in traditional marriage.
Therefore, you’d have to have a headcount of the pro-family group to even start answering your question.
You are absolutely hilarious, Rich. I pick 3. I think the vast majority tolerated the really long lines just to get a chicken sandwich on Wednesday.How does one tell if the crowds on Wednesday were 1. pro-family, 2, pro-traditional marriage, or 3. just hungry for a chicken sandwich.
Option 1 and 2 are not the same. Some couples are childless by choice, but believe in traditional marriage.
Therefore, you’d have to have a headcount of the pro-family group to even start answering your question.
It is relevant to the topic, whether or not it is true. If it is found to be false it is still worth mentioning that, so we can dismiss anyone perpetuating the myth. If it is true, then that is something to be considered. I didn’t have time to do plenty of research, but from what I did find, there were only some people making the claim, and others asking for proof of it.How very odd that you declare that it’s extremely relevant and then ask if it’s true. Great googly moogly, if it ain’t true, how could it possibly be relevant???
When you did your Internet research, what did you discover?
Rhetorical question–I’m going to bed.![]()
Yes, that’s it. What a coincidence all these people getting chicken cravings on that particular Wednesday.You are absolutely hilarious, Rich. I pick 3. I think the vast majority tolerated the really long lines just to get a chicken sandwich on Wednesday.![]()
Well, probably not, but Luigi was asking about the pro-family bunch. I have a cousin who, by choice, is childless. She is, however, for traditional marriage.You are absolutely hilarious, Rich. I pick 3. I think the vast majority tolerated the really long lines just to get a chicken sandwich on Wednesday.![]()
Okay, you’re right. But, will someone tell me how to separate the ones who are pro-family from those who are simply pro-tradmarriage? You weren’t thinking, I hope, of just lumping everyone together. In that case, you might want to include the pro-family gays with the pro-family heteros.Yes, that’s it. What a coincidence all these people getting chicken cravings on that particular Wednesday.![]()