Chik-fil-A Stands Up for Traditional Marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter catholicanne
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
šŸ‘ šŸ‘

I said this before and I will say it again:

I worked briefly at Chick-Fil-A during the early 90’s and I can categorically state that they are NOT ā€œanti-gay.ā€

They ARE ā€œAnti-Gay Marriage,ā€ ā€œPro-Traditional Marriage,ā€ and ā€œAnti-Normalization of behavior and lifestyles that are against God’s Law and Natural, traditional cultural laws.ā€
 
I do think CNN covered it briefly and in passing yesterday during their broadcast.

Not much, of course, but at least they acknowledged it. Not surprising, though, given they’ve proven they are biased to the left generally.

Fox News, of course, did in-depth coverage-----since obviously they are biased to ā€œthe other side.ā€

Just saying.

Yep.
 
I do think CNN covered it briefly and in passing yesterday during their broadcast.

Not much, of course, but at least they acknowledged it. Not surprising, though, given they’ve proven they are biased to the left generally.

Fox News, of course, did in-depth coverage-----since obviously they are biased to ā€œthe other side.ā€

Just saying.

Yep.
4 acts of vandalism towards Chick A fil I have heard of
 
Searching the legal definitions for Marriage vs Gay Marriage, in reputable ā€œlegalā€ dictionaries I found this at Cornell University pertaining to the US Congress:

(Note: I could not find a true legal definition pertaining to ā€œGay Marriageā€)

1 USC § 7 - DEFINITION OF ā€œMARRIAGEā€ AND ā€œSPOUSEā€

In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ā€œmarriageā€ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ā€œspouseā€ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.

*This preliminary release may be subject to further revision before it is released again as a final version. As with other online versions of the Code, the U.S. Code Classification Tables should be consulted for the latest laws affecting the Code. Those using the USCPrelim should verify the text against the printed slip laws available from GPO (Government Printing Office), the laws as shown on THOMAS (a legislative service of the Library of Congress), and the final version of the Code when it becomes available. *
Current through Pub. L. 112-131. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/7
 
Besides, if the average person knew what was pumped into those chicks to make them grow faster, they wouldn’t want to eat them. Lets just say it’ no surprise that so many people are obese ad unhealthy. You are what you eat fits very well here.
High fructose corn syrup, sugar, all the pesticides and other chemicals in food are the reason people are obese. You mean to tell my you never met an overweight vegetarian?
 
Whatever for chick fil a. I won’t support a fast food joint that supports the inhumane treatment of chickens, simply so they can save a buck and put out cheap food. Shame on them. Maybe they haven’t read their bible as closely as they think. Abusing animals is unchristian.
OOookk, this was kind of weird, biting my tongue and being charitable here.
 
May God grant Mr. Perry eternal rest. It is a brave and noble thing to publicly defend the institution of marriage in the center of the storm.
 
Whatever for chick fil a. I won’t support a fast food joint that supports the inhumane treatment of chickens, simply so they can save a buck and put out cheap food. Shame on them. Maybe they haven’t read their bible as closely as they think. Abusing animals is unchristian.
I’m interested in knowing where those bible passages are regarding abusing animals.
I can understand your outrage. However, chicken (and pork) are the cheapest meats available to the poor (and to all of us, for that matter). Insisting on free range only makes chicken nearly as expensive as regular beef. That disproportionately harms the poor.
The duplicitous nature of l-----ls makes me suspect as to their true nature and intentions. Always a call for the poor, but no genuine concern on their part for the poor. Thank you for calling that out.
 
Proverbs 12:10
I thought maybe it said we can’t eat them. But that does remind me, that I need to check my oil and antifreeze.

I like the idea of not abusing animals, but the Gays that we are discussing in this thread are abusing each other.
 
High fructose corn syrup, sugar, all the pesticides and other chemicals in food are the reason people are obese. You mean to tell my you never met an overweight vegetarian?
Yes, I watch the Democratic National Convention every four years.
 
There seems to be a certain irony that this talk comes from people who don’t seem to care about what they put in their mouths anyway.
I see what you did there. šŸ˜‰
Don’t feel ashamed. Liberal-baiting is grand sport on the Forum (if a teeny bit uncharitable,) and there are few enough of us who reject right-wingism that, if we didn’t post here, would leave no one else for the Right to make fun of. šŸ™‚ šŸ™‚
Personally I can’t stand the people you Americans typically refer to as ā€œliberalā€ or ā€œconservativeā€. I think both groups are nutters and don’t even fit the true meanings of either of those words. Using those words is often a cop out, a way to dismiss an opinion or idea without actually discussing the merits. It’s similar to how the pro-homosexualists use ā€œhomophobiaā€ to demean and shut down opponents.
I have Blackberry pad and no smart phone.
Thank you for your support of homegrown Canadian tech businesses!
Value Village Resale shop. Really.
Isn’t that the go-to place for hipsters and hippies? I think it’d be even more likely to support organisations that Catholics find offensive than would the firms listed above.
However, I caution that we mustn’t counter offensive rhetoric with offensive rhetoric rhetoric. Love, compassion, and understanding is the only way we can win the ā€˜culture war’. You can’t win an argument or convert people with hate.
Finally! Someone understands! Going around spouting off terms like ā€œsocialistā€ or ā€œKenyanā€ or ā€œhomophobicā€ or ā€œintolerantā€ don’t win you any converts and only make you look like someone who is only capable of regurgitating sound bytes from cable news.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for a source to this remark because no one ever said it… Typical the leftie ploy. Think they know what’s in your head and then chastise you for it. They are so much more intelligent than us STOOPID uneducated people who cling to our guns and religion.

You oppose gay marriage, you do it because you are a homophobic, bigoted hater. :rolleyes:
Who says this guy is a ā€œleftieā€? Maybe he just thinks it’s silly to conflate buying fast food with supporting a political cause. Just because someone doesn’t think it’s worth going to a fast food joint does not mean they either are a ā€œleftieā€ or support homosexualism. Your comment is made in the same vein as those who throw around terms like ā€œhomophobicā€. It assumes that everyone who doesn’t agree with 100% of what you say must be an enemy to be derided and silenced.
 
Don’t hold your breath waiting for a source to this remark because no one ever said it… Typical the leftie ploy. Think they know what’s in your head and then chastise you for it. They are so much more intelligent than us STOOPID uneducated people who cling to our guns and religion.

You oppose gay marriage, you do it because you are a homophobic, bigoted hater. :rolleyes:
As much as I am opposed to the groups that support anarchy, at least their members are free to believe in anything or everything because there are no ideals. Many of the far left are hypocrites because their members are forced to believe certain ideals and display an intolerance for anyone who disagrees. They just want what they want and they don’t care how they get it. Should we pray for those who fear and dislike those who are different? Yes. Should we pray for those who fear and dislike the opposite gender? Hmm… Relativism at it’s finest…
 
You guys sure like magic. On top of that, you are the most anti-Jesus bunch I have seen.
 
You guys sure like magic. On top of that, you are the most anti-Jesus bunch I have seen.
Welcome to CAF, Monrocsol!!! šŸ™‚
  1. What do you mean ā€œlike magic?ā€ :confused: Define your terms, sir.
  2. ā€œAnti-Jesus?ā€ In what way? Please clarify. :confused:
  3. Aren’t YOU technically ā€œAnti-Jesusā€ since YOU are an agnostic?
Just wondering. Again, though, sincerely----------welcome to CAF. šŸ‘
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top