L
LittleSoldier
Guest
I can’t correct you if you’re wrong. Only the poster to whom I was responding can do that. If that poster had discussed his/her reasons for believing that the OP can’t debate the topic I would understand. Maybe. But the assertion was just thrown out there. After having that happen to me numerous times I do get a little ticked off when I believe I am seeing it happening to someone else.LS, I totally agree with you that it is wrong to jump at someone for letting their opinion be known and trying to foster discussion on it. As for the quoted statement, though, I believe (and please correct me if I’m wrong) that this is in reference to the fact that the OP has not read the Harry Potter books, and therefore can only cite other people’s opinions rather than Brooklyn’s own personal opinion.
At least for me, there is a certain frustration when someone argues to ‘read the source and make their own opinion’ in reference to their argument, but admits to not reading the source of the opposition. This in no way excuses one from being charitable, but the thread was not started as a discussion on the statements made by a priest, but rather a condemnation of Catholic Harry Potter fans. The following quote is taken from the original post, and I do find it of an attacking nature:
For all you die-hard fans, I know it’s hopeless. It’s scary how much of a hold these stories have over some people so that they won’t even consider that there might be something wrong with them. If only people would hold to the dogma of the Church as rigidly.
See, there is a difference here. You made a statement and then backed that statement up with a discussion of why you made that statement. Thank you for that. That is what I would like to see and what I would hope people would always do instead of just stating something. :yup: Perhaps the poster I was referring to thought it was so obvious that he/she didn’t need to explain further. But it wasn’t obvious to me.All we are arguing is that if you haven’t read the books, you shouldn’t say they are dangerous. You could easily say that certain religious figures believe them to be dangerous, but they are not speaking with any authority. Furthermore, Brooklyn is also assuming that we do not hold to the dogmas of the Church. I’m sorry, but I was unaware my reading list affected the strength or depth of my faith. Because I have read and own many of C.S. Lewis’ technical works, does that mean I’m drifting towards Anglicanism? Or do we trust educated, ‘of age’ Catholics to read works, whether fiction or non-fiction, and pick out the appropriate material. Just as there is great value to Catholics in Lewis’ belief in Purgatory by the Scriptures and reason, so is there in having teens, young adults, or any appropriate reader reading stories of good triumphing over evil in a moral, courageous way.
It’s obvious to me that you are being charitable.Again, I do not at all condone being uncharitable, and I hope that the tone of my statements does not come off that way. I am simply saying that the OP made several ‘unfounded’ assertions as well, so let’s step back and focus on the subject matter.
And I concede. Thank you.