Church Exorcist and Pro Life Priest Warns Against Harry Potter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brooklyn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LS, I totally agree with you that it is wrong to jump at someone for letting their opinion be known and trying to foster discussion on it. As for the quoted statement, though, I believe (and please correct me if I’m wrong) that this is in reference to the fact that the OP has not read the Harry Potter books, and therefore can only cite other people’s opinions rather than Brooklyn’s own personal opinion.
I can’t correct you if you’re wrong. Only the poster to whom I was responding can do that. If that poster had discussed his/her reasons for believing that the OP can’t debate the topic I would understand. Maybe. But the assertion was just thrown out there. After having that happen to me numerous times I do get a little ticked off when I believe I am seeing it happening to someone else. 😦
At least for me, there is a certain frustration when someone argues to ‘read the source and make their own opinion’ in reference to their argument, but admits to not reading the source of the opposition. This in no way excuses one from being charitable, but the thread was not started as a discussion on the statements made by a priest, but rather a condemnation of Catholic Harry Potter fans. The following quote is taken from the original post, and I do find it of an attacking nature:
For all you die-hard fans, I know it’s hopeless. It’s scary how much of a hold these stories have over some people so that they won’t even consider that there might be something wrong with them. If only people would hold to the dogma of the Church as rigidly.
All we are arguing is that if you haven’t read the books, you shouldn’t say they are dangerous. You could easily say that certain religious figures believe them to be dangerous, but they are not speaking with any authority. Furthermore, Brooklyn is also assuming that we do not hold to the dogmas of the Church. I’m sorry, but I was unaware my reading list affected the strength or depth of my faith. Because I have read and own many of C.S. Lewis’ technical works, does that mean I’m drifting towards Anglicanism? Or do we trust educated, ‘of age’ Catholics to read works, whether fiction or non-fiction, and pick out the appropriate material. Just as there is great value to Catholics in Lewis’ belief in Purgatory by the Scriptures and reason, so is there in having teens, young adults, or any appropriate reader reading stories of good triumphing over evil in a moral, courageous way.
See, there is a difference here. You made a statement and then backed that statement up with a discussion of why you made that statement. Thank you for that. That is what I would like to see and what I would hope people would always do instead of just stating something. :yup: Perhaps the poster I was referring to thought it was so obvious that he/she didn’t need to explain further. But it wasn’t obvious to me.
Again, I do not at all condone being uncharitable, and I hope that the tone of my statements does not come off that way. I am simply saying that the OP made several ‘unfounded’ assertions as well, so let’s step back and focus on the subject matter.
It’s obvious to me that you are being charitable. 🙂 I find it interesting (and somewhat frustrating) that when people post on the Internet they are taking a chance of their words being taken completely in the wrong way. I haven’t figured out how to solve this problem. You could easily read this response to your post as being uncharitable and sarcastic. But I don’t mean it to be that way. I appreciate your response, your clarification, and your discussion.

And I concede. Thank you. 🙂
 
Who is more interesting in a child’s life? Harry Porter and his gang of spell casting witches and wizards or Jesus Christ and the Apostles? Who receives more face time from your child - Harry Potter or Jesus?

We live in a secular society. It’s evident from answers given here - by adults - how attractive the activities of witches and wizards are. People react to any negative comment of this character as equivalent to his scurging.

At a time when children aren’t that interested in religious education and Mass attendance, they are being fed an acceptance and knowledge of a religious belief system that involves witchcraft, spells, incantations, etc.

"Isolation from Church leads more to occult practice than Harry Potter, bishop says
November 19th, 2010

Baltimore, Md., Nov 19, 2010 / 01:36 pm ( CNA/EWTN News ).- Americans around the country will be flocking to see the latest Harry Potter movie this weekend, and some Catholics maintain that the series exposes children to evil influences.

But Bishop Thomas Paprocki said in a recent interview that the root cause of dabbling in the occult comes from being isolated from the faith."
 
I can’t correct you if you’re wrong. Only the poster to whom I was responding can do that. If that poster had discussed his/her reasons for believing that the OP can’t debate the topic I would understand. Maybe. But the assertion was just thrown out there. After having that happen to me numerous times I do get a little ticked off when I believe I am seeing it happening to someone else. 😦

I completely understand, and my ‘correct me if I’m wrong’ comment was more towards the poster of that remark - I was hoping to gain some clarification on their statement too!

See, there is a difference here. You made a statement and then backed that statement up with a discussion of why you made that statement. Thank you for that. That is what I would like to see and what I would hope people would always do instead of just stating something. :yup: Perhaps the poster I was referring to thought it was so obvious that he/she didn’t need to explain further. But it wasn’t obvious to me.

Maybe people don’t have time, maybe people want to be inflammatory, maybe people don’t have rational support for their conclusions. Let’s all hope that cool heads, calmly-discussed arguments, and more thought/clarity put into responses prevail across the whole forum - no more ‘jab and duck’ responses anymore!

It’s obvious to me that you are being charitable. 🙂 I find it interesting (and somewhat frustrating) that when people post on the Internet they are taking a chance of their words being taken completely in the wrong way. I haven’t figured out how to solve this problem. You could easily read this response to your post as being uncharitable and sarcastic. But I don’t mean it to be that way. I appreciate your response, your clarification, and your discussion.

Thank you - my biggest concern is that someone will misinterpret my tone and think I am ‘on the attack.’ And you presented your response in a wonderful, clear, and pleasant way, so thank you again for that.

And I concede. Thank you. 🙂
You are very welcome!
 
I did a thread on this a long time ago, over a year ago, and gave proof after proof of what I said, and it did absolutely no good. It did teach me, though, that Harry Potter fans will defend their ground no matter what. I saw this article today, actually linked from The Drudge Report, and since I have such high respect for Father Euteneuer, I posted it here.

If you’re really interested in my thoughts about Harry Potter, and how I got slammed for them, here is the thread:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=355135&highlight=harry+potter
Thanks for the link. I read every post you made in that thread, but they hardly qualify as proof. I accept Ratzinger’s warning that there are “subtle seductions” whenever one talks about other-wordly power. We have to guard our imaginations against the seduction of power as much as the seduction of lust, or anger, etc. That said, by firmly keeping in mind that these books are fiction, that seduction disappears. How can you be tempted by something you know isn’t real?

Though lifesitenews no longer carries the article, I found Michael Obrien’s article that you mentioned, and I also read that (did you?). It’s garbage. I could easily write that kind of essay about how (for example) Moby Dick indoctrinates readers in the value of rage and revenge, and then claim that when people angrily defend it as a classic work of literature, their anger only further proves my point. His essay is disingenuous for other exaggerations he makes, which I’ll be willing to outline for you if needed.

As a bonus, here’s an article you might appreciate about Obrien’s ever shifting standards of morality in media: scificatholic.com/2010/07/michael-d-obrien-on-twilight.html

Shortly after you left that thread, the following post was made which really nails what I’d like to say. (emphasis added by me)
Brooklyn–

The great medieval philosophers all believed strongly in the maxim “The appeal to human authority is the weakest of all arguments.” I agree with them.

Experts and news outlets and quotes don’t convince me because I’m looking right at their logic, and it breaks down. I’m looking right at their reasoning, and it doesn’t make sense. I’m looking right at their evidence, and it doesn’t support their conclusions. It doesn’t matter that they’re experts on the occult or reliable prolife news outlets. They are not experts on Harry Potter, and their arguments simply don’t make sense.

Fr. Amorth says that the Harry Potter books are dangerous because they draw a false distinction between black and white magic. But they don’t; I’ve read the Harry Potter books many times, and they do not make a distinction between good and bad magic. What’s more, under Fr. Amorth’s definition of magic, there is no magic in Harry Potter.

Bro. Mary says that the Harry Potter books are written from the worldview of witchcraft. But he doesn’t explain that claim. He doesn’t provide a shred of evidence for it.

Meanwhile I have read a mountain of evidence that Rowling’s worldview as expressed in Harry Potter is very Christian, and Rowling herself has said that the Scripture quotes in the 7th book almost epitomize then entire series! And in the face of such evidence I am supposed to conclude that the Harry Potter books are dangerous to the soul, just because of Fr. Amorth’s and Bro. Mary’s good names and their experience battling the occult, even when they are not experts on the Harry Potter books, and even when I am looking right at their arguments and they don’t make sense? I can’t do that.

Brooklyn, you seem convinced that those who are defending Harry Potter continue to do so despite your quotes because they are just that loyal to the series. But that’s not true. I’m not fighting you on this because I’m just that loyal to Rowling’s work. I’m fighting you on this because your experts’ arguments simply don’t make sense and because I seem to have specific refutations of them. And I’ve given those refutations, in this post and others. Where am I wrong? Why are my responses to Fr. Amorth’s arguments invalid?

Citing experts won’t do it. “The appeal to human authority is the weakest of all arguments.” I want to see an explanation of why the Harry Potter books are dangerous. I haven’t seen one yet that doesn’t break down. I have to believe what I think is really true. And so I do.
 
Who is more interesting in a child’s life? Harry Porter and his gang of spell casting witches and wizards or Jesus Christ and the Apostles? Who receives more face time from your child - Harry Potter or Jesus?

We live in a secular society. It’s evident from answers given here - by adults - how attractive the activities of witches and wizards are. People react to any negative comment of this character as equivalent to his scurging.

At a time when children aren’t that interested in religious education and Mass attendance, they are being fed an acceptance and knowledge of a religious belief system that involves witchcraft, spells, incantations, etc.

"Isolation from Church leads more to occult practice than Harry Potter, bishop says
November 19th, 2010

Baltimore, Md., Nov 19, 2010 / 01:36 pm ( CNA/EWTN News ).- Americans around the country will be flocking to see the latest Harry Potter movie this weekend, and some Catholics maintain that the series exposes children to evil influences.

But Bishop Thomas Paprocki said in a recent interview that the root cause of dabbling in the occult comes from being isolated from the faith."
Barb, I am somewhat confused by your post, and I hope you can clarify. Are you saying that those of us who have read the series and defend it for its virtues and morals contained in its pages draw us away from the Church and into the secular society?

You also seem to be saying that children spend more time with Harry Potter than with Jesus. If this is the case, then I say it is the duty of the parents to involve their child with the Church, and you cannot blame Harry Potter for being of interest. The amazing thing would be for children to read the books with their parents, and let their parents talk to them about how brave, how faithful, and how virtuous Harry Potter his classmates (not quite a gang), and others are in fighting evil, corruption, and prejudice. Also, I can’t imagine that reading each book and seeing each movie once could equate to more time than prayer, mass, and Sunday school, but that is really a point that is unable to be argued, so let’s pass on it then.

Lastly, you include a quote from the Bishop that says it is isolation from the faith (which could very well occur in the home) that leads children to the occult, not Harry Potter. The article does mention that ‘some Catholics’ believe the child is exposed to ‘evil’, but the focus of Bishop Paprocki is that arguing Harry Potter as evil is nothing compared to keeping the faith from children.

What does greater harm - letting your child read Harry Potter, or having the only faith in their lives be mass on Sunday? The Bishop seems to have given his opinion quite clearly, and I respectfully stand behind it based on my own experiences.
 
Thanks for the link. I read every post you made in that thread, but they hardly qualify as proof. I accept Ratzinger’s warning that there are “subtle seductions” whenever one talks about other-wordly power. We have to guard our imaginations against the seduction of power as much as the seduction of lust, or anger, etc. That said, by firmly keeping in mind that these books are fiction, that seduction disappears. How can you be tempted by something you know isn’t real?
This is a good response. Sure we need to be cautious but we also need to be discerning. Relying on experts won’t work. We need to do the research ourselves.
The great medieval philosophers all believed strongly in the maxim “The appeal to human authority is the weakest of all arguments.” I agree with them.
I agree too.
Experts and news outlets and quotes don’t convince me because I’m looking right at their logic, and it breaks down. I’m looking right at their reasoning, and it doesn’t make sense. I’m looking right at their evidence, and it doesn’t support their conclusions. It doesn’t matter that they’re experts on the occult or reliable prolife news outlets. They are not experts on Harry Potter, and their arguments simply don’t make sense.
Exactly what I have been trying to say to a friend of mine and the threads on here. I have read the books. I love them and I don’t see where they are getting their argument. If somebody has an argument then back it up with concrete, verifiable evidence and facts. It is embarrassing that these “experts” haven’t done their homework either.
Fr. Amorth says that the Harry Potter books are dangerous because they draw a false distinction between black and white magic. But they don’t; I’ve read the Harry Potter books many times, and they do not make a distinction between good and bad magic. What’s more, under Fr. Amorth’s definition of magic, there is no magic in Harry Potter.
This is very aggravating
Bro. Mary says that the Harry Potter books are written from the worldview of witchcraft. But he doesn’t explain that claim. He doesn’t provide a shred of evidence for it.
This is why I don’t listen to him and others like him because clearly they haven’t done their homework. They can’t give any concrete specifics at all.
Meanwhile I have read a mountain of evidence that Rowling’s worldview as expressed in Harry Potter is very Christian, and Rowling herself has said that the Scripture quotes in the 7th book almost epitomize then entire series! And in the face of such evidence I am supposed to conclude that the Harry Potter books are dangerous to the soul, just because of Fr. Amorth’s and Bro. Mary’s good names and their experience battling the occult, even when they are not experts on the Harry Potter books, and even when I am looking right at their arguments and they don’t make sense? I can’t do that.
I can’t do that either.
Brooklyn, you seem convinced that those who are defending Harry Potter continue to do so despite your quotes because they are just that loyal to the series. But that’s not true. I’m not fighting you on this because I’m just that loyal to Rowling’s work. I’m fighting you on this because your experts’ arguments simply don’t make sense and because I seem to have specific refutations of them. And I’ve given those refutations, in this post and others. Where am I wrong? Why are my responses to Fr. Amorth’s arguments invalid?
You are not wrong. I completely understand where you are coming from because I am coming from the same stance.
Citing experts won’t do it. “The appeal to human authority is the weakest of all arguments.” I want to see an explanation of why the Harry Potter books are dangerous. I haven’t seen one yet that doesn’t break down. I have to believe what I think is really true. And so I do.
I do too. I have yet to see a truly convincing argument, citing actual, concrete evidence from the series that it is evil and btw, quoting from the bad guys won’t cut it either.
 
For all you die-hard fans, I know it’s hopeless. It’s scary how much of a hold these stories have over some people so that they won’t even consider that there might be something wrong with them. If only people would hold to the dogma of the Church as rigidly.

👍
And for you all you misguided Catholics who read way too much into things, I think it’s pretty hopeless too. It’s scary to think how so many people simply do not have a clue about what is harmless and fun entertainment and what is truly dangerous to your soul.

By screaming about innocent things like Harry Potter, it makes it much harder to take you seriously about things that are truly dreadful.

If only people where more secure in their faith…

I’m not a Harry Potter fan in the least, by the way.
👍
 
How does a parent teach discernment to a child about the 1st Commandment, when they themselves are not aware of what the Catechism teaches about attachments to magic and sorcery.

A child learns by example.

When a parent expresses enjoyment or grants access to this dark religion (which rejects Christianity and any reliance on God) they are setting a president for future belief in that religious system of belief.

There is no “religion” per se that surrounds Star Wars. Harry Potter and friends are child witches and warlocks who live in an underworld outside of the ‘norms’ of society.

Later, in their defiant teenage years, children will realize and come into contact with established Wiccan religions, New Age philosophies and practices that militantly contradict Christianity.

vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a1.htm
 
Who is more interesting in a child’s life? Harry Porter and his gang of spell casting witches and wizards or Jesus Christ and the Apostles? Who receives more face time from your child - Harry Potter or Jesus?

We live in a secular society. It’s evident from answers given here - by adults - how attractive the activities of witches and wizards are. People react to any negative comment of this character as equivalent to his scurging.

At a time when children aren’t that interested in religious education and Mass attendance, they are being fed an acceptance and knowledge of a religious belief system that involves witchcraft, spells, incantations, etc.

"Isolation from Church leads more to occult practice than Harry Potter, bishop says
November 19th, 2010

Baltimore, Md., Nov 19, 2010 / 01:36 pm ( CNA/EWTN News ).- Americans around the country will be flocking to see the latest Harry Potter movie this weekend, and some Catholics maintain that the series exposes children to evil influences.

But Bishop Thomas Paprocki said in a recent interview that the root cause of dabbling in the occult comes from being isolated from the faith."
Well put. 👍
 
Who is more interesting in a child’s life? Harry Porter and his gang of spell casting witches and wizards or Jesus Christ and the Apostles? Who receives more face time from your child - Harry Potter or Jesus?

We live in a secular society. It’s evident from answers given here - by adults - how attractive the activities of witches and wizards are. People react to any negative comment of this character as equivalent to his scurging.
I really don’t mean to gang up on you Barbkw, but 90 percent of people can handle what I did. Learning about ::gasp:: both.

I was always a very advanced reader who would read everything he got his hands on. I would learn about Jesus, the Apostles, and also read fanstasy novels, sci-fi, you name it.

It’s not a zero sum game.
 
Oh look. Another Catholic taking what ONE PRIEST says, and making it out to be the belief of the Vatican as a whole, because this one priest happens to share said Catholics beliefs. So they are obviously more right than anyone else in the Church who disagrees with the said Catholics views.

Here we have a classic case of picking and choosing, to suit the OP’s required needs.
OP also makes the post as blunt as possible, pretty much saying at the start “I AM RIGHT, AND YOU ARE WRONG” leaving no room for debate.

Because the OP cannot debate the matter.

Gee. I’ve never seen this before. :rolleyes:
You are being uncharitable in this post. If you’ll notice, the OP has quoted quite a few priests in various posts, and most, if not all of them are in some way experts on demonology, possession, and the various incarnations of evil. It is very often the fans (of all stripes) who chose to discount the opinions of educated priests, when those priests warn against “innocent fun”. Mocking and insulting a post intended to edify does nothing but distract from what might be an insightful discussion.

Please leave off the sarcasm and discuss, if you have something to contribute.

As far as the books themselves, one of the most disturbing elements I’ve noticed about them is the fans themselves. I saw it on a previous “Harry Potter” thread, fans of the books become so absorbed in the “world” of Harry Potter and even (playfully, I’m sure) fling about “Harry Potter curses” towards those who dismiss or discourage the books. This is not acceptable. While I do realize that the “curses” aren’t “real”, what fans forget is that intention, more than the words themselves are a part of the sin of witchcraft. One of the major faults of the magic in the Harry Potter books is the tendency of both sides to use it on others. The manipulation of persons with magic has always been a sign of wickedness, even in cultures that condone magic. The Potter books do not make this distinction, there are only a few spells forbidden in the Potter books, this is draws an essentially meaningless line between good and evil. The fans seem to fall into this murky middle-ground too easily for comfort’s sake.
 
You are being uncharitable in this post. Please leave off the sarcasm and discuss, if you have something to contribute.

.
There is a difference between being uncharitable and sarcastic. A little sarcasm is fine. I’m sure there was no intent to hurt anyone.
 
As far as the books themselves, one of the most disturbing elements I’ve noticed about them is the fans themselves. I saw it on a previous “Harry Potter” thread, fans of the books become so absorbed in the “world” of Harry Potter and even (playfully, I’m sure) fling about “Harry Potter curses” towards those who dismiss or discourage the books.
 
The OP gave me info I appreciate re Fr. Euteneur-spelling?- being an exorcist.I didn’t know that. Thank you.
I think there are different ways to look at the books in question.Both sides can have some validity depending on circumstances & who might be reading them.
My instinct would be to not give the devil more than his due but to also not discount the views of a priest who has experience with the diabolical.
I appreciate CAF because it causes me to look deeper at subjects like this which were not really in my radar.
 
How does a parent teach discernment to a child about the 1st Commandment, when they themselves are not aware of what the Catechism teaches about attachments to magic and sorcery.

A child learns by example.

When a parent expresses enjoyment or grants access to this dark religion (which rejects Christianity and any reliance on God) they are setting a president for future belief in that religious system of belief.

There is no “religion” per se that surrounds Star Wars. Harry Potter and friends are child witches and warlocks who live in an underworld outside of the ‘norms’ of society.

Later, in their defiant teenage years, children will realize and come into contact with established Wiccan religions, New Age philosophies and practices that militantly contradict Christianity.

vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a1.htm
What I’m hoping to express to you is that there is no ‘religion’ either. The Force is precisely the same thing as the ‘spells’ used in Harry Potter. The wands are like light sabers, and the evil is just as wickedly portrayed. It isn’t about a bunch of chanting in a circle in the middle of the woods calling on demons to do their bidding, it is about school children who use their powers (in this case magic) to combat evil.

The whole idea of Harry Potter is that the society, though remaining ‘underworld’ as you put it, remains that way for their own protection. However, the good guys respect the human world, try to protect it from evil too, and oppose those who want to harm humans. But the idea isn’t to get caught up on this ‘wizard/witch’ stuff. As was noted earlier, that is merely a plot device.

In C.S. Lewis’ The Space Trilogy, there are other planets that have intelligent life upon them. Does that mean Lewis believes it is not only man who was made in the image of God? Of course not. But it is his device to express a deeper point. When people become hung up on the superficial details, they are blind to the beauty within.

Again, please do not assume we are uneducated in the faith, or that we think of Harry Potter as a ‘dark religion’. It isn’t. It is a series of fictional books. When you accept it as that, and know it to be fiction, then there is no harm in enjoying the books. The only precedent I can think of that a child would take when seeing their parents reading is that reading is an enjoyable activity. The end. The only people saying there is a religion around Harry Potter are precisely those condemning it.

At the end of the day, I think it should be up to an individual to determine if they should read it, and if that person is a parent, the decision also rests on them about whether their children will read it. Your choice has been not to read it, and although this does limit your ability to argue this matter, we will simply leave it at that. As for myself, and I think I can safely speak for the others who have agreed with me thus far, our choice has been to read it. We found nothing in it that defied Catholic teaching, but we did pick up on some wonderful bits of heroism, morality, and faithfulness.

Lastly, I assure you that all teenagers will come into contact with Wiccans, New Age philosophies, and the like, but that is nothing like the magic in Harry Potter. Would you stop your child from watching Fantasia because of the magic? What about Cinderella? It isn’t just about these things though. Will you ban your child from every reading a book that contains references to other gods? Think of all the classical Roman and Greek works that will be put away, when a simple talk about what’s real and what’s for enjoyment could sate both desires?
 
Lastly, I assure you that all teenagers will come into contact with Wiccans, New Age philosophies, and the like, but that is nothing like the magic in Harry Potter.
Simple computer searches will advance your eduction level as to the connective practices of what children see on Harry Potter and the subadult - adult practice of witchcraft and New Age occultism.

Harry Potter glamorizes witchcraft by presenting it in the positive.

Teen children however, embrace witchcraft out of their personal negativism toward authority and Christianity’s requirement to follow the moral principles established in the 10 Commandments.
 
Simple computer searches will advance your eduction level as to the connective practices of what children see on Harry Potter and the subadult - adult practice of witchcraft and New Age occultism.

Harry Potter glamorizes witchcraft by presenting it in the positive.

Teen children however, embrace witchcraft out of their personal negativism toward authority and Christianity’s requirement to follow the moral principles established in the 10 Commandments.
Barb, these teens, etc will probably get involved with the occult without Harry Potter. The “witchcraft” which isn’t the real thing in Harry Potter will not make most people go out and become witches. A few probably but that is their responsibility. The “witchcraft” which I and others have explained is nothing more than a plot device to tell a story about good triumphing over evil. There is magic in CS Lewis’s books. There is also magic in Lord of the Rings. These were both written by an Anglican and a Catholic. The Harry Potter series is also written by an Anglican who admits to have had struggles with her faith and she touches on some of those themes in the series. She still draws from the Western Judeo-Christian tradition in her books. If there are some fans who want to glorify the bad guys because they like all that goth stuff and then get involved in witchcraft, etc then that is their responsibility. Not Rowling’s, etc. The vast majority of people will not go in that direction.
 
Simple computer searches will advance your eduction level as to the connective practices of what children see on Harry Potter and the subadult - adult practice of witchcraft and New Age occultism.

Harry Potter glamorizes witchcraft by presenting it in the positive.

Teen children however, embrace witchcraft out of their personal negativism toward authority and Christianity’s requirement to follow the moral principles established in the 10 Commandments.
A quick read through the pages will show you that the literature is harmless. Can you please provide the basis of your opinion that it glamorizes witch craft? The truth is that witch craft is not presented in the positive or the negative; it is simply a tool by which people do good or evil. The device must be neutral because there must be opposition, that struggle of good versus evil. If all magic was good, there could be no evil forces in the book. If all magic was bad, there would be no morality or virtue. If you looked past the cover, you would see that none of the books are about magic, they simply use them.

I don’t know if you have ever seen V for Vendetta - a graphic novel turned movie. It matters not if you have, but I would like to share a line that a character’s father used to say to her when she was younger:

“Actors use lies to tell the truth, while politicians use them to cover it up.”

Witch craft is not real. J.K. Rowling is not out there trying to recruit young people for the service of Hell. She is creating a fictional world so that she can express truths, such as faithfully following when we may not understand but know the path is made, remaining courageous is difficult times when the right choice is not popular, and sacrficing ourselves for the sake of others. You will find these plot lines in the books themselves and throughout Scripture.

By not treating Harry Potter as ‘taboo’ and the ‘gateway to the Occult’, parents can inform their children that it is fictional, for entertainment, and it does hold some wonderful, moral ideas.

And again, you yourself are saying that the embracing of the occult among youth comes from negativism towards the Church, so please either provide us with something concrete that connects Harry Potter to this negativism, or drop this line of argument. The Bishop even said it IS NOT Harry Potter, but rather isolation from the faith, so please try to stay consistent with the speaker’s intentions when quoting them.
 
Another tedious call for evidence – not opinion, not argument – of how HP has corrupted anyone in the last 10 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top