S
StudentMI
Guest
There’s an idea from Pierre Bourdieu that there are left and right ‘hands’ of the state. The right is the militaristic side, while the left is the social services side, to simplify it to the point of near absurdity. I would tend to agree with that, and that each side tends to promote its favored hand.Do you see any difference when the state is conservative and when it’s left leaning? I’d be interested to see some examples. You surely don’t mean that any all states simply want you to be subservient. That smacks of paranoia and you certainly don’t seem the paranoid type.
But the point, as I see it, is that left or right hand aside, it’s one body operating them. Public schools have always operated according to a system of instilling patriotic values in children, along with training in obedience and more often than not teaching them to accept their place in the socio-economic system.
Nothing but the law of supply and demand. Culture plays an important part in maintaining a system of liberty. But I do posit that a system of voluntary exchanges is inherently less authoritarian leaning than a system of compulsive exchanges. Markets are so often associated with state capitalism that this has been forgotten.And you could also explain why private interests couldn’t be accused of exactly that which you are accusing the state. What’s to stop them being nurserys for religious or political extremism?