Thinking about the secular aspect of this discussion, particularly a candidate being viewed as a ‘persecutor of the Church’, I have to wonder how either candidate is considered otherwise. While one openly disagrees with doctrinal issues, the others faith teaches that Christ is the spirit brother to Satan, Mary’s conception was less than immaculate, and the Catholic Church is an apostate Church since the original Church suffered a great apostasy. That’s just a few of what the other candidate’s faith teaches, yet this is not considered one to be a form of ‘persecuting’ our Church?
To hold the Cardinal accountable for one invitation over another, with the above thought in mind, seems to indicate a political motivation.