X
Xanthippe_Voorhees
Guest
I never said a women should not work. Stop misquoting me.
Your premise is that “equal pay” is to stop women from being homemakers.
IE they are not in the workforce.
I never said a women should not work. Stop misquoting me.
LOLDo homemakers not work? They work very hard, based on what I’ve seen.
Yeah. That happened in the 1500’s.Catechism of the council of Trent, on the Duties of a Wife:
“To train their children in the practice of virtue and to pay particular attention to their domestic concerns should also be special objects of their attention. The wife should love to remain at home, unless compelled by necessity to go out; and she should never presume to leave without her husband’s consent.”
The teachings of the church don’t work that way. Some things are taken out because they are not relevant anymore–or even damaging.Truth is absolute. What was true then is true today.
Currently we (our culture) are celebrating same sex ‘marriage’, divorce, abortion, transgenderism and a host of other insanities. The past wasn’t perfect but it might have had more collective wisdom than our age.
whyeyeman:![]()
The teachings of the church don’t work that way. Some things are taken out because they are not relevant anymore–or even damaging.Truth is absolute. What was true then is true today.
If this was truly the case than St. Giana and Bl. Chiara would not be permitted to rise to sainthood–yet all the women saints who were mothers in the last couple of centuries have worked outside the home for wages. Quite the contradiction don’t you think?
More than just a case, and it’s simple in principle. A temporal authority must ultimately have recourse to physical punishment, else it isn’t really a temporal authority. If trads ‘put their money where their mouth is’ then it’s clear the husband has the right to strike his wife, again, assuming commensurability to the offence. It is revolutionary and anarchical to deny that he has this right and can exercise it in justice. One could go into a great deal more detail discussing the circumstances in which it would be called for and the proper limits on the husband’s rights in this respect (since we are not Roman pagans who believe in an unlimited patria potestas), but that’s unnecessary and diversionary at this time, when it is actually the principle that’s being rejected.
An excellent wife, who can find? For her worth is far above jewels. The heart of her husband trusts in her, And he will have no lack of gain. She does him good and not evil All the days of her life. read more.“So let’s go back to the Biblical woman of great value. The women held
in most high esteem. She clearly worked outside the home.”
Why do you think this? Where exactly does it state that she worked outside the home? Are we thinking of the same passage? Do you think she went out and worked in some kind of weaving / spinning / sewing factory? Don’t you think she did this in her own home?