Thank you. All I need now is for you to reference the ḥādīth, so that I may read it for myself. I have the major collections, o finding it should not be difficult.the Mi’raj - the hadith on the second ascent to heaven - the word “ladder” is used.
Thank you. All I need now is for you to reference the ḥādīth, so that I may read it for myself. I have the major collections, o finding it should not be difficult.the Mi’raj - the hadith on the second ascent to heaven - the word “ladder” is used.
Oh apologies. He rode on a white donkey with wings. Sorry.great black winged beast!
Sure. It seems the underlying issue is that the Quran is your sole source of information on Islam.Yes, I am aware of this. What puzzled me was your use of the word ‘ladder’. I’ve not come across that before.
Well blow me…that’s not in the Qur’an eitherOh apologies. He rode on a white donkey with wings. Sorry.
What does it mean to be empirically minded? Is reality limited to your ability to empirically verify? Or will you trust others who empirically verify?…
That’s not exactly an improvement in the minds of the empirically minded. Not at all.
Is this reference good enough: https://www.al-islam.org/miraj-night-ascension/ahadith-traditions#hadith-n-2-method-mi’rajHume:
Thank you. All I need now is for you to reference the ḥādīth, so that I may read it for myself. I have the major collections, o finding it should not be difficult.the Mi’raj - the hadith on the second ascent to heaven - the word “ladder” is used.
The Qur’an is certainly not my sole source of information on Islam. Trouble is, none of my sources state that the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) used a ladder to ascend to Heaven. I am bereft of such a source…please help me outSure. It seems the underlying issue is that the Quran is your sole source of information on Islam.
The best one, for sure! But not the only one…
No ladder, but there is mention of some kind of steed (and saddle).Thank you. God willing, I’ll read these more fully tomorrow, and come back to you. On first reading, I see no mention of climbing a ladder, but…my old eyes might well be deceiving me.
Yes, theories. And realize the theory of Evolution simply describes a process, it does not explain the origin of life or the cosmo. The theory of evolution is like describing a computer program and theorizing how the program works based on Speculation. As for God, there are plenty of intellectual proofs for God’s existence.We have so much evidence for the theories of evolution that it’s not credibly considered in doubt anymore.
Scientists will tell you that time and matter came into existence with the Big Bang. Logically the cause then is outside of time itself and outside of matter itself; this alone is evidence that the Cause is eternal (outside of time) and spiritual (outside of matter); Spiritual meaning rational as evidenced by the cosmos and all of the laws which govern it, which are comprehensible through the logical language of mathematics.As to the cause of that beginning?
I thought that God was an eternal living Being. Do you now say that God was dead?God died in the cross.
There must be some sort of literacy issue here… seriously.Niblo:
No ladder, but there is mention of some kind of steed (and saddle).Thank you. God willing, I’ll read these more fully tomorrow, and come back to you. On first reading, I see no mention of climbing a ladder, but…my old eyes might well be deceiving me.
Evolution is a theory, just as the theory of gravity is a theory. In science, theory is as good as it gets. The next level down is hypothesis and below that is speculation.Yes, theories.
Even in a Buddhist universe material must have a beginning, where did matter originate , how did your scientifically proven chemical elements come about. Don’t duck and weave this question, your dismissal of it as ‘ irrelevant ‘ is yet another straw man by you.With the Buddhist universe being eternal, there is no requirement for creation. The question is irrelevant
Matter can appear spontaneously out of nothing when there is a quantum fluctuation: A Mathematical Proof That The Universe Could Have Formed Spontaneously From Nothing | by The Physics arXiv Blog | The Physics arXiv Blog | Medium.…where did matter originate in your Buddhist universe
Sure, like the big bang. In Hinduism ( I am not so sure about Buddhism), the Universe is cyclical. The Universe periodically gets created and then destroyed and this continues endlessly. So the big bang was just the last beginning. There is no Single creation.Like the Big Bang