Coronavirus: Disinfectant firm issues warning after Trump comments

  • Thread starter Thread starter OraLabora
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, you assume you know. You take the view he didn’t recommend people inject cleansers. To my view, the criticism is that if he is joking, it was inappropriate and demonstrates his lack of impulse control. It he was serious, then he has serious psychological issues. In either case, I question his emotional stability and cognitive abilities.
 
JapaneseKappa said:
Now you’re claiming victory in the face of two unanswered evidences against your case. If you think there is a context which exonerates the president, provide it.
Click to expand...
No one claimed victory.
But perhaps I should. After all, the personal attack indicates such.

Is that where your idea that someone is claiming victory came from?

As to the context, you were the one supplying quotes of sentence fragments. You were the one asked for the rest.
That you refuse does not help your case.
 
I don’t have Trump. I think he has serious emotional and cognitive issues.
 
vz71 said:
As to the context, you were the one supplying quotes of sentence fragments. You were the one asked for the rest.
Click to expand...
You asked:
vz71 said:
Do you have an exact quote to indicate “the man seriously suggested injecting disinfectant into the human body to kill the virus.”?
Click to expand...
And you were provided the video in which Trump says:
And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you’re going to have to use medical doctors with. But it sounds — it sounds interesting to me.
Click to expand...
At which point you began arguing that:
vz71 said:
Sounds like a question.
Click to expand...
To which I have provided sections of this quote which are explicit endorsements of the idea. Now you have returned to pretending that my quotations are taken out of context.
 
JapaneseKappa said:
And you were provided the video in which Trump says:
Click to expand...
Wow.
Looks like the transcript changed.

So where did you find this one?

Actually, it doesn’t matter in this case.
You are arguing about my statement that I see a question, and the specific post shows my response was to the transcript with a question mark in it.
So where did the question go?
How exactly do the post I responded to change from then to now?
Did you do that?
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic saying he doesn’t know what Trump is talking about . . . .
I don’t know what he meant.

But I know what he DIDN’T mean.
Click to expand...
niceatheist thinking he knows Cathoholic better than Cathoholic . . . .
No, you assume you know.
Click to expand...
And there ya have it! niceatheist speaking for me.

niceatheist . . .
You take the view he didn’t recommend people inject cleansers.
Click to expand...
Right.

niceatheist . . .
To my view, the criticism is that if he is joking . . .
Click to expand...
Naturally the problem with this is niceatheist assuming I think he is joking when I never said any such thing.

(I explicitly said it was a stupid comment that I am not going to defend. I also said Trump PROBABLY meant antibiotics but you would have to ask him.)

Cathoholic . . .
But he was almost certainly trying to talk about antibiotics, but if he uses the word “antibiotics” he knows people will criticize him for using the term “antibiotics”.

They will just run him down saying: “Doesn’t this guy even know that antibiotics don’t kill VIRUSES but rather bacteria!”

(That’s exactly WHY I said "anti-viral antibiotics like Tamiflu" otherwise I would have heard the same critical comments here about me as well.

In other words, it doesn’t matter what Trump says. The leftist press criticizes him.)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Certainly, and if you believe he did, great. Many do not. However, one tends to tune out critics who never have anything good to say. The perception is since their motives are impure, they are to be discounted, even when they are correct. They do that to themselves.

Besides, the bias stems not from critiquing a singular event, but critiquing all of them. If you cannot bring yourself to say an occasional good thing for every hundred bad things or so, your opinion likely doesn’t mean squat.
 
I think he is a great politician, has led a scandalous and sometimes even disturbing life in the past, seems to be a completely different man now which is something the bible is littered with, think his administration has done truly wonderful and praiseworthy things in regards to abortion.

So we aren’t far off.
 
Wait, there is no evidence Trump is in poor health, while Biden appears to be losing his mind, yet he’s slightly dotty?

Oh, and there’s the ongoing matter of the sexual assault charge he is facing while running.
 
OraLabora said:
You don’t by any chance think that if so many posters here are having trouble parsing what he really meant, there might be a problem with his statements?
Click to expand...
I have no idea what the posters on here are or aren’t having trouble with, as I have not read many of the posts. Did I say there wasn’t a problem with Trumps statement? I said what I remember hearing.
OraLabora said:
None of these possibilities leave me with a warm and fuzzy feeling about the leadership of our great neighbour to the south.

I think that the end of the Trump era, whether it happens in January 2021 or January 2025, will end in tears,
Click to expand...
Well you have the option of not voting for Trump, and crying tears if he gets re-elected.
 
Horton said:
Of course the DNC state run news media wants this to be portrayed a certain way.
Click to expand...
What state-run news media is that? I think the closest we have to state-run media in the United States are PBS and NPR. However, they are not actually run by the government. Also, if we did have state-run media in the US, wouldn’t it currently be controlled by the Republican Party, since that is currently out governing party? If it interests you, the media outside the US are covering this exactly the same way. In the UK, the BBC, Sky, and LBC, which are broadcast media and therefore strictly non-political, are all expressing bewilderment and horror at the president’s comments.
Joy01 said:
Well you have the option of not voting for Trump, and crying tears if he gets re-elected.
Click to expand...
I assume that @OraLabora is Canadian…
 
Last edited:
F_Marturana said:
This isn’t meant for internal use. Or treatments of humans.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. UV light is currently being explored to be injected into the lungs to treat the virus. It has been developed by scientists at Cedars-Sinai to administer ultraviolet light inside the bodies of patients inflicted with respiratory infections. The research team at Cedars-Sinai is currently working with the FDA to explore an expedited regulatory process to use the treatment as a possible medical intervention for those suffering from coronavirus. UV light has been used to treat other respiratory infections before (pulmonary tuberculosis).

apnews.com

Aytu BioScience Signs Exclusive Global License with Cedars-Sinai for Potential Coronavirus Treatment

Cedars-Sinai-Developed ‘Healight' Medical Device Platform Technology Being Studied as a Potential First-in-Class COVID-19 Treatment
apnews.com apnews.com

Maybe Trump missed his calling as a medical researcher.
 
Last edited:
You managed to work what Trump said to something he absolutely didn’t say
 
Dr_Meinheimer said:
Oh, and there’s the ongoing matter of the sexual assault charge he is facing while running.
Click to expand...
I said he was a “funny uncle with roving hands”. I guess you didn’t catch my drift.
Joy01 said:
Well you have the option of not voting for Trump, and crying tears if he gets re-elected.
Click to expand...
Alas I don’t have that option. I’m Canadian. I get to enjoy or endure whomever you Usonians vote to inflict on the world.
 
Last edited:
Dr_Meinheimer said:
Certainly, and if you believe he did, great. Many do not
Click to expand...
That highlights a big and very dangerous issue. Many do not believe it was an error to discuss injecting disinfectant.

Thank you for displaying the issue here.
 
Dr_Meinheimer said:
Besides, the bias stems not from critiquing a singular event, but critiquing all of them. If you cannot bring yourself to say an occasional good thing for every hundred bad things or so, your opinion likely doesn’t mean squat.
Click to expand...
This thread is not about praising individuals. That is off topic.
 
Joy01 said:
Likewise for us Usonians. That’s the way this world works. You can still cry those tears though.
Click to expand...
I’ll never waste good tears on a politician. I prefer to keep them for tear-jerker movies 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top