Sure there is. Why is the secular liberal approach the only tolerated one, the secularists have somehow convinced everyone that their way is the only option. Besides if you really want to attack that one of the big players of the west the UK still plays dress up with a queen and state church.
As someone who has been banned occasionally for unnacceptable behavior, I am certain that this is not how CAF bans people. You might want to pm someone in the help forums to see if there is anything that they can do.
Yes, I’ll do that. Thanks.
I don’t have anything against the pomp and ceremony of the royals. There is beauty and tradition and pride in being British involved in all the regalia. The Queen is no longer a political figure, so she can be a focus of British unity that goes beyond political stances.
What are you implying? That everyone who doesn’t just listen to BBC propaganda (coming from them its hilarious considering their record of bias and propoganda on issues) on CAF is a paid Kremlin troll? Wasn’t there an article about poroshenko recruiting a western troll army. Would you like it if people accused you of being one of Poroshenkos trolls. Who on here do you think is explained (names) by this typical one sided anti Russian BBC hack piece?
Its still a state church though and the Queen isn’t only a secular figure she is the defender of the faith and the head of the state church. So do you have a huge problem with this more egregious mixing of church and state then what Russia has or does being on team west cover for that?
???
We might as well come clean.
Hmmm…I don’t know.
A whole thread was taken out (over 50% of Ukrainians. . ), so that may be why your post never showed up.
I have been out several hours. Was there any reason given for removing the thread?
What I am saying is that at least that makes sense of what I am reading.
I’m slavic so obviously I report to the head of the KGB internet trolling department section CA. Not to mention my avatar is actually a photograph of the man who pays me for making these posts.Hmmm…I don’t know.
There’s that Putinista poster.
That Jharek guy is married to a Russian and has admitted taking “frequent” trips to Russia. VERY suspicious.
And then there’s Tomdstone, obviously a fake name. His real name is probably Tomdstonski.
I’ve think we’ve stumbled on a whole fifth column!!!
So instead of putting the article against reality and testing its validity your approach is to validate the article and make reality conform to it in your view. But if you do believe it than who is part of this troll group here? Can you name them?
I think it was removed because its had an article from RT which is banned here. While that is incredibly biased and unfair, it is an american forum so I just learn to accept the different treatment certain things receive.
How would I even know?
I’ve encountered these trolls on many media forums.
What do you think I am a cartoon character that lives on the internet and not the real world? Broaden your horizons and beyond the economist and Fox news many people including Pat Buchanan and others don’t share your views. The bizarre claims about the west given hear and the whitewashing that they receive makes me scratch my head at those outlandish claims. Things like expecting Crimean’s to self hate themselves and spit at the idea of being Russian just because the western masters want Crimean ports for Nato. Crimean’s should now be punished for even associating themselves with those inferior Russians that they got what they deserved for not self hating enough I guess and running around with right sector.
Have you ever heard of the American conservative political commentator Pat Buchanan? He was a senior advisor to President Richard Nixon, President Gerald Ford, and President Ronald Reagan. He also ran for President himself.