M
matjam
Guest
@Elvis_George between which is your parish?
. . . . I made no such demands. Merely a suggesting keeping the rosary is not a demand. The rosary is a timeless tradition of the Catholic Church. If there at least be one tradition that unites all the branches of the Catholic Church, it ought to be the rosary.Rather, before @Elias demands that other churches keep the latinization
I just read it, and it has more to do with our Eastern siblings that are in schism not with Eastern Catholics and an order to “delatinize”. So please, enlighten me where did the Pope order the Eastern Catholics to “delatinize”? I would like to know so I don’t live in ignorance.Oriental Lumen
Thank you for pointing this out. My favorite part was this:ORIENTALIUM ECCLESIARUM
Although I’ve not been able to find an English translation of Pope Benedict’s “Constitution” (titled Demandatam coelitus humilitati nostrae), the reviews that I’ve found say that it explicitly forbids Easterners to mix Latin liturgical practices with their own. Although Pope Benedict XIV addressed this document to the Melkites who were entering communion with Rome at the time, Pope Leo XIII expanded the application to include all Eastern Catholic Churches“Inasmuch as this diversity of liturgical form and discipline of the Eastern Churches is approved in law, besides its other merits, it has redounded tremendously to the glory and usefulness of the Church. They ought not figure any less as subjects of Our charge. So much is this the case that it is in the best interest of all that their discipline not haphazardly borrow anything that would be ill-suited from Western ministers of the Gospel whom love for Christ compels to go to those peoples. The decisions that Our illustrious Predecessor Benedict XIV in his wisdom and foresight decreed in the Constitution of 24 December 1743 remain in force.”
There are many Eastern Catholics and Orthodox who pray the rosary as a private devotion. I’m honestly fine with that, so long as their use of the rosary doesn’t replace our own Eastern devotions to the Mother of God.East can keep Rosary but as organic development, not because they are asked to for sake of uniformity. Uniformity is not unity. On the other hand if people have already accepted Rosary as their own it would be bad to tear it away from them just because it is prevalent in Latin Rite. It is not up to us Latins to decide which is which.
A tradition of the Latin Church, not the Eastern Churches.The rosary is a timeless tradition of the Catholic Church
The Eastern Catholic Churches and Rome are united in faith, not a personal devotion.If there at least be one tradition that unites all the branches of the Catholic Church, it ought to be the rosary
It’s actually written to the Eastern Catholic Churches:Oriental Lumen
I hope this helps. I have provided selective quotes, but it is best to read the whole document.Elvis_George:
Okay, this will be the 3rd time I ask this question in this thread. Please, can someone please give me a link where Rome/The Pope/The Vatican talks about delatinization or the need to delatinize non-western catholic churches.Rome supports delatinisation hands down
The liturgical laws valid for all the Eastern Churches are important because they provide the general orientation. However, being distributed among various texts, they risk remaining ignored, poorly coordinated and poorly interpreted. It seemed opportune, therefore, to gather them in a systematic whole, completing them with further clarification: thus, the intent of the Instruction, presented to the Eastern Churches which are in full communion with the Apostolic See, is to help them fully realize their own identity. The authoritative general directive of this Instruction, formulated to be implemented in Eastern celebrations and liturgical life, articulates itself in propositions of a juridical-pastoral nature, constantly taking initiative from a theological perspective.
Desiring that these treasures flourish and contribute ever more efficiently to the evangelization of the world, Orientalium Ecclesiarum affirms, as do successive documents, that the members of Eastern Churches have the right and the duty to preserve them, to know them, and to live them.14 Such affirmation contains a clear condemnation of any attempt to distance the Eastern faithful from their Churches, whether in an explicit and irreversible manner, with its juridical consequences, inducing them to pass from one Church sui iuris to another,15 or whether in a less explicit manner, favoring the acquisition of forms of thought, spirituality, and devotions that are not coherent with their own ecclesial heritage, and thus contrary to the indications so often emphasized by Roman Pontiffs and expressed, with particular force, already in the Apostolic Letter Orientalium Dignitas of Leo XIII.
Ridiculous, yes. Uncharitable, no.You are being ridiculous and uncharitable.
Coming from a latin, it is.Merely a suggesting keeping the rosary is not a demand.
Again, 500 years of history shows that this is not what happens.Nothing needs to be replaced.
that is call a “latinization”Again, as a unifying factor for the enitre Catholic Church and her various branches.
Miaphysitism is non-trinitarian, and it denies the humanity of Jesus.I myself believe the Miaphysitism is not heresy and even compatible with Catholic teaching!
The Catholic Church considers Miaphysitism as compatible with Chalcedonian Christianity. It is Monophysitism that is condemned as heretical.Elvis_George:
Miaphysitism is non-trinitarian, and it denies the humanity of Jesus.I myself believe the Miaphysitism is not heresy and even compatible with Catholic teaching!
And not a unifying factor. The unifying factors are the Pope, the Divine Liturgy, the Holy Mysteries, and the Divine Office.that is call a “latinization”
That is not correct. Miaphysitism is the term given to the christology of St. Cyril of Alexandria. It affirms both the divinity and humanity of Christ, through St. Cyril’s formula "one nature of the Incarnate (humanity) Word of God (divinity).Miaphysitism is non-trinitarian, and it denies the humanity of Jesus.