Democratic convention

  • Thread starter Thread starter scipio337
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just in from Catholic Advocate:

Last night at the Democratic National Convention, activist Sandra Fluke was given a primetime, network slot to continue her campaign to rewrite history. In case you have forgotten, Ms. Fluke gained fame when pro-abortion supporters in Congress attempted to have her testify at a hearing about the Obama administration’s infringements on our religious liberties. Plain and simple, Ms. Fluke is an abortion activist – period. But that is not the worst part…

In her speech last night, Ms. Fluke looked straight into the camera and called people who believe in the Sanctity of Life “extreme” and “bigoted voices”.

This convention could be renamed the Abortion Convention, and I don’t think a single participant would blink an eye! The platform that was ratified at the beginning of the week reads, "The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay." And last night alone we heard from Cecile Richards, the head of Planned Parenthood who praised the president for all he has done for the abortion movement, and get this—the ring leader of the George Soros funded “Nuns on the Bus” who insists that the laws protecting the unborn are “beyond my paygrade.” Didn’t we hear that once before from a certain candidate?

Don’t be fooled by the president’s posturing to return “God” to the faith section of the platform after backlash from Catholic Advocate and numerous other groups. This very moment, the Department of Health and Human Services is working to finalize the rules for implementing tax-payer funded abortions under Obamacare. Weren’t we told the Executive Order prevented the abortion funding?

The new Introductory Note to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ document Faithful Citizenship: A Catholic Call to Political Responsibility reads, “The moral and human challenges outlined in the second half of Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship remain pressing national issues. In particular, our Conference is focused on several current and fundamental problems, some involving opposition to intrinsic evils and others raising serious moral questions: Continuing destruction of unborn children through abortion and other threats to the lives and dignity of others who are vulnerable, sick, or unwanted;”

It is a sad and disappointing day when one of our political parties so aggressively embraces a culture of death.

We need to remember—life comes first. To care about life is to care about everything.
 
Seems like a big mistake on the DNC’s part. IMHO a lot of people will read it as a lack of confidence in their own man.
I like Biden despite, and sometimes because of his quirks.

I do think they should have him primetime.
 
I agree that the atmosphere at the DNC was far from dismal; on the contrary, it may better be described as manic. Anyone who watched it on television and thought it depressed must be a truly hard-core republican partisan whose cognitive perception was profoundly affected by their political attitudes. At the same time, I found the RNC extremely enthusiastic as well. In my experience, that’s the way conventions generally are. This perception SHOULD have nothing to do with one’s politics, but apparently for some it does. I find that interesting from the psychological perspective.
Great. You have an impression from television.

I know delegates who are there in person.
 
Why don’t they let the VEEP have the President’s time? I can encapsulate the Presiden’t speech without hearing it. Here goes: I did, I am, I will, I have, I know, I want, I am sure, I need, my children, your children, my wife, my mother, my father, my cousin, my aunt, my house, my book, my car, I accept, . There you have it.

The VEEP would be a little more fun: Who am I anyway? Where am I? Why am I? I built that.
People heard the oratery 4 years ago and were inspired, Obama became president, but words are words. Obama is now recycling the same things he used in 2008 and 2012

Bet Obama will have a poetic speech at the DNC but hours after his speech the August job numbers are released and Gallup is predicting it could increase to 8.7%

Doubt Obama will not mention the $16 trillion or the 15 million that have gone on food stamps in his presidency
 
Mr. Clinton pretty much shut down the Republican arguments. No doubt about that to anyone who has listened to both sides. It is just a matter of educating people.
 
I agree that the atmosphere at the DNC was far from dismal; on the contrary, it may better be described as manic. Anyone who watched it on television and thought it depressed must be a truly hard-core republican partisan whose cognitive perception was profoundly affected by their political attitudes. At the same time, I found the RNC extremely enthusiastic as well. In my experience, that’s the way conventions generally are. This perception SHOULD have nothing to do with one’s politics, but apparently for some it does. I find that interesting from the psychological perspective.
I think it also depends on when people watched. I saw a bit of everything (excitement, interest, and boredom) during both conventions.
 
Just in from Catholic Advocate:

Last night at the Democratic National Convention, activist Sandra Fluke was given a primetime, network slot to continue her campaign to rewrite history. In case you have forgotten, Ms. Fluke gained fame when pro-abortion supporters in Congress attempted to have her testify at a hearing about the Obama administration’s infringements on our religious liberties. Plain and simple, Ms. Fluke is an abortion activist – period. But that is not the worst part…

In her speech last night, Ms. Fluke looked straight into the camera and called people who believe in the Sanctity of Life “extreme” and “bigoted voices”.


You don’t support sex and race-selective abortions?

slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/05/31/sex_selection_abortion_and_the_pro_choice_movement_why_liberals_shouldn_t_gulp.html

BIGOT!!!
 
Sandra Fluke: Ryan “Would Allow Women to Die in Emergency Rooms”

lifenews.com/2012/09/05/sandra-fluke-ryan-would-allow-women-to-die-in-emergency-rooms

She said

Sandra Fluke is not telling the truth. Day 1 panel had 5 men, panel on day 2 had 2 women - Doctor at Calvin College Health Services, Laura Champion and senior vice president for academic affairs at Oklahoma Christian University, Allison Garrett

The Women That Testified to Congress that Planned Parenthood Missed?

patheos.com/blogs/yimcatholic/2012/02/the-women-that-testified-to-congress-that-planned-parenthood-missed.html

Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz Prez: “Proud to Support Obama”

lifenews.com/2012/09/05/planned-parenthood-abortion-biz-prez-proud-to-support-obama
The big question is going unanswered. Did Clinton hit on Sandra Fluke?
 
Mr. Clinton pretty much shut down the Republican arguments. No doubt about that to anyone who has listened to both sides. It is just a matter of educating people.
I listed to both sides, and found his argument lacking.

The simple fact that the Democratic party invited the head of Planned Parenthood and Sandra Fluke to their convention is all the “educating” I need.
 
Prayerful warrior Lady… question what you are doing! Are you serious? Show some class and decency. As a prayerful Catholic, your posts are repulsive and are on the border of being a devil’s advocate.
I’m not sure what the source of your outrage is. Did you read the link?
Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser…She told LifeNews: “Opposing the sex selection and post-fetal pain abortion bans voted on in the House of Representatives are minority stances among women and all Americans. Voting four times against measures that would provide equal protection to children accidentally born alive after a failed abortion is a clear minority stance. Requiring Americans to pay for abortion through their taxes is a minority view as well. Where is that ground he is standing? It is uncommon, callous, lonely ground.”
Is there something in here that is not factual or inaccurate??
 
Mr. Clinton pretty much shut down the Republican arguments. No doubt about that to anyone who has listened to both sides. It is just a matter of educating people.
Clinton delivered a great speech, but his facts were very selective. His presidency rode the dot.com bubble (and a housing market bubble), both of which popped right after he left office. He knows very well that Bush 43 got completely hosed by that. I’m not saying Clinton was an awful president, but he simplistically painted it as though we did well under his Democratic policies, and Bush 43’s Republican policies messed it all up.

In fact, if we’re going to be accurate here, Bush 43’s harmful policies weren’t even fiscally conservative ones, nor ones shared by Romney. And Obama’s fiscal record are NOT analogous Clinton’s. So… yeah.

This is about Romney vs. Obama. Not Clinton vs. Bush 43.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top