R
Ridgerunner
Guest
I don’t think he identifies as any of them. He principally identifies as his idiosyncratic self.He’s speaking of a pro-life culture, which certainly doesn’t involve three marriages and two divorces. As he explains, “If the abortion culture has anything to do with the wider degradation of our society’s sex and morals — as pro-lifers have argued it does for as long as I have been alive — then there is nothing pro-life in endorsing a candidate who has bragged about the number of his sexual partners. It matters that Trump is unwilling to answer whether he personally has funded abortions. It matters a great deal.”
You’re welcome to disagree. But I fail to see how this is “one of the worst-reasoned arguments.”
This:
Maybe he, you know, identifies as pro-life rather than Republican or Democrat.
There are people, and he might be one of them, who thinks that only by casting all of us into purgatory can he cleanse us of our ideological impurities. Some are not only willing, but actively desirous of seeing things get worse. “The worse the better” as Lenin said.
As I said, this fellow is either a Hillary supporter pretending to be a conservative or he is willing to shoot all of us in the foot to show us how much smarter and more “pure” he is than the rest of us.
No few of those around. We have seen them before on CAF and will undoubtedly see them some more.