Democrats excluding Catholics

[Annie]

You can imagine anything you want to about Trump. I prefer to stick to the real world of facts.

 

[Imdaman]

Why do you think I might be experiencing “self-righteous indignation”? I stated some facts and pointed out where your attempts to show that Catholics vote for Republicans because they " no longer have the stomach for the gospel message of providing for the poor, caring of widows and orphans, freeing the oppressed? But, I guess they have a convenient scapegoat to avoid the uncomfortable feeling of guilt" is a total fail.

So, basically, the fact that Catholics actually do what they can to provide for the poor, and at higher levels than those who vote for people who have reserve their compassion regarding pregnancy for those who want to have sex whenever and with whomever they want rather than for the babies they conceive in their reckless disregard for reality.

Sorry, what I have no stomach for is the verbal perversions pro-abortion soi-disant Catholics emit to justify their position and for the useful idots who support them.

Who are the moneychangers in this equation?

Annie he dose’nt know who the money changers are but can only throw out emotive responses to clear thinking. This is an another example of how the left ignores inconvienent truths so that they can continue their irrational judgment of all things right!

 

[Imdaman]

I did not say you were attacking me; I responded to what you posted, which you seem to have forgotten was, “Perhaps those offended in the temple, when Jesus tipped over the tables, were experiencing similar self righteous indignation?”

There is simply no other way to read this other than that the only response you could think of to what I wrote in response to your slanderous view of Catholics who do not vote as you think they ought was to ask if I might not be feeling a feeling you think might have also been held by some very bad people.

Annie, Hereiam doesn’t argue with facts and comprehension he just throws out nonsensical emotion to stir a pot. I think you are beginning to see this with many of his responses.

 

[SuperLuigi]

Are you kidding?

 

[Hereiam]

You two are inconsolable and our titt for tatt is probably as annoying to the others following this thread as it is tp me and you two…so i’m out of this one.

 

[Imdaman]

Nice back peddle…glad you caught on.

Annie this is a perfect example of how he believes he is wining an argument. His grasp of the truth is tenuous at best.

 

[SuperLuigi]

One thing to remember is that a lot of Democrats have been voting GOP for decades over the abortion issue alone and now because of all this identitarian social justice hogwash.

@sallybutler

 

[Imdaman]

Annie:

You can imagine anything you want to about Trump. I prefer to stick to the real world of facts.

I prefer that abortion end and I think the best way would be for men to stop having sex with women who aren’t their wives. Ridgerunner seems to think there is no correlation between abortion and sex outside of wedlock, but I certainly do.

I don’t trust your point of view, can you please show where Ridgerunner has indicated this is his view?

 

[SuperLuigi]

No, I’m not kidding, but I understand that many who get their news from odd sources might think that Catholic thinking totally aligns with one party.

It doesn’t exactly, but people love to hold the GOP to impossible standards just so they can keep voting Democrat and soothe their consciences while doing so.

It’s also an intellectually lazy and dishonest argument to say that both parties are equally not in the Catholic camp.

Catholics need to get their heads out of the sand and realize what is going on. It may or may not mean voting GOP, but it certainly excludes voting for the far-left.

 

[Imdaman]

So then you admit that bringing up Trumps adulterous proclivities was just an emotive reaction thats only purpose was to push your anti-Trump narrative forward. Good work!

 

[Imdaman]

Have a nice day! May God bless you with his abundance, love and Mercy.

 

[Imdaman]

SuperLuigi:

Are you kidding?

No, I’m not kidding, but I understand that many who get their news from odd sources might think that Catholic thinking totally aligns with one party.

No one that I konw on here has said this. This is more emotion from you jagged. Please indicate anyone on CAF who you think believes this. It is generalized Calmuny!

 

[SuperLuigi]

I’m not sure that holding a party to not support racism,

https://710wor.iheart.com/featured/mark-simone/content/2018-01-11-dozens-of-the-racist-comments-made-by-joe-biden/

Could you also explain to me why liberals call me Latino racist names?

torture

The definitions of this vary too much to have an extended discussion on here.

unjust wars

Guess who got us into

World War I
Korea
Bay of Pigs
Vietnam
Libya

Hint: Not the GOP

 

[Imdaman]

SuperLuigi:

It doesn’t exactly, but people love to hold the GOP to impossible standards just so they can keep voting Democrat and soothe their consciences while doing so.

It’s also an intellectually lazy and dishonest argument to say that both parties are equally not in the Catholic camp.

I’m not sure that holding a party to not support racism, torture and unjust wars really is that much of an impossible standard.

WHich party platform supports any of those isms?

 

[SuperLuigi]

I can tell you from personal experience which one.

Also, just look at how they treat other minority conservatives. Pretty hateful things they’ve said…

 

[Theo520]

I guess I consider ignoring the behavior or justifying it as unimportant or happened in the past as a bit of defending. I should have been more clear.

That said, I agree with you that many that deriding Clinton’s behavior have found Trump’s behavior as unimportant.

I wasn’t very political at the time but I do find the Whitewater investigation to have focused on his office affair to be a blemish. Oddly if it has occurred today, the #metoo movement would have been the group demanding his resignation

 

[Imdaman]

Ridgerunner seems to think there is no correlation between abortion and sex outside of wedlock

Imdaman:

I don’t trust your point of view, can you please show where Ridgerunner has indicated this is his view?

Read through the thread. He was asking for evidence that abortion is more likely when a baby is conceived in an adulterous affair.

hahaha, So because he said that asked you for evidence of your accusation you conclude that:

“Ridgerunner seems to think there is no correlation between abortion and sex outside of wedlock”

Your logic sure has a way of running away with your imagination. Priceless stuff!

 

[Imdaman]

Imdaman:

So then you admit that bringing up Trumps adulterous proclivities was just an emotive reaction thats only purpose was to push your anti-Trump narrative forward. Good work!

I’m trying to figure out what, in my statement, can possible qualify an emotive reaction. Unprotected, adulterous sex will result in unwanted pregnancies and those often end in abortions. Are you denying otherwise?

No I don’t argue with that, This small morsel of truth. in your otherwise emotional explosion in this thread, finally shows a bit of clarity on your part. My issue of course was not about this. This is where your emotions again take over and your logic fails!

 

[ProVobis]

That’s a good point. Unprotected sex means openness to pregnancy. Is that really what they could deal with?

 

[Imdaman]

No one that I konw on here has said this. This is more emotion from you jagged. Please indicate anyone on CAF who you think believes this. It is generalized Calmuny!

Again, with the emotion. I’m actually concerned that you are becoming emotional. I think you can read for yourself the various opinions around this site and decide for yourself who might feel a certain way.

Yes I’m always emotional but forever logical with a sarcastic bend. I will take it from your wave of the hand you can not back up what you accuse people of believing. Namely that many might think that Catholic thinking totally aligns with one party. This is why I say you speak with emotion rather than logic. it is because you throw out this wild claims with no truth to them. I will not waste my time looking for any indication of this claim because it is not there and I believe you no this… So emotional!