Democrats Launch Smear Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Adopted Children

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nepperhan here earlier in the thread . . .
Breitbart likes to highlight any person it can find to make a foolish statement – if the person is a leftist. . . . .
Then Nepperhan appealed to Mother Jones reporting on ex-members (here) . . .
"[Barrett’s] a member of People of Praise, a charismatic covenant community in South Bend, Indiana, that has been criticized by former members . . . .
Of course EVERY group, at least religious group gets criticized by “former members”. The question is, is it true? Who said that (so you can actually respond)? WHY did they say that? Can their gripes be substantiated?

Mother Jones (which was Nepperhan’s citation here) did not address any of this. They seem like they are attempting to fool you without a critical look at what they are saying.

Breitbart just reported the fact and showed WHO was doing the smearing against Amy Coney Barrett.

.

@Victoria33 adroitly responded (here) . . .
Mother Jones is worse
Nepperhan (here) . . .
. . . can we deal with the facts stated? That way we can move the discussion forward.
Good grief.
 
Last edited:
Nepperhan . . .
As folks here said of Trump’s infidelities: “That’s all in the past.”
First of all, this thread is NOT about “Trump”.

I mean really. Instead of worrying about vapid comparisons, can we deal with the facts stated? That way we can move the discussion forward.

The facts stated are the leftist smears against a woman and mom - Amy Coney Barrett. The Democrats are bullying girls and women again.

The second thing I would say is nobody has said “That’s all in the past.”

But a lot of people like me have not seen any evidence of that in the present.

I have also seen President Trump actually working (not just talking) to move our country in a pro-life direction, and doing this in today’s society is a work of GRACE.

Thirdly, if Trump were committing “infidelities” in the here and now, we would hear all about it, with intricate detail from CNN.
 
Last edited:
The facts stated are the leftist smears against a woman and mom - Amy Coney Barrett. The Democrats are bullying girls and women again.
What smears? There was one person making ignorant comments. Folksare trying to gin that up to be Democratic smears as to the nominee and her children? It just ain’t so.
 
Nepperhan . . .
There was one person making ignorant comments.
Bold mine.

There was no persons in the White House making ignorant comments yet you saw fit
to drag Trump in here again
(see it here).

I explained the modus operendi of the leftists on these things (a trial ballooon from someone that gets read enough to matter. Then guage public reaction. Then proceed accordingly taking political expediency largely into account).
 
Last edited:
There was no persons in the White House making ignorant comments yet you saw fit
to drag Trump in here again
My comment were as to the rhetorical consistency of some posters and only mentioned Trump indirectly. I was not bringing anyone in.
I explained the modus operendi of the leftists on these things (a trial ballooon from someone that gets read enough to matter. Then guage public reaction. Then proceed accordingly taking political expediency largely into account).
So you’re extrapolating this as to a (sinister) habit of leftists? That sounds paranoid to me.
 
Last edited:

Gospel MT 18:1-5, 10

The disciples approached Jesus and said,
“Who is the greatest in the Kingdom of heaven?”
He called a child over, placed it in their midst, and said,
“Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children,
you will not enter the Kingdom of heaven.
Whoever humbles himself like this child
is the greatest in the Kingdom of heaven.
And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.

“See that you do not despise one of these little ones,
for I say to you that their angels in heaven
always look upon the face of my heavenly Father.”
 
Nepperhan . . .
So you’re extrapolating this as to a (sinister) habit of leftists?
The “sinister” is YOUR addition.

A “modification” of my premise.

Why did you do this to my response?

It is an emotional argument (your putting “sinister” in there).

For most leftists it is not “sinister”.

It is from blindness
from their own self-destructive behavior
with no repentance along with not going to Confession.

So they are not so much “sinister” as ignorant.

And their ignorance stems from their blindness.

And their blindness stems from their
contracepting,
murdering their own pre-born babies,
doin’ porn,
sexual deviancy, especially sodomy, etc.

Many of the sins of the day in our epoch.
With abortion being particularly spiritually and intellectually brutal
on the victims that perpetrated it against their own children, but sodomy is also very hurtful to themselves.

I have just observed the same pattern over the years (Trial balloon. Check reaction of public.
Politically OK? Attack.
Politically NOT OK? Let it fade away.)

It just gets old watching the leftists do this time and time again.

This attack on Amy Coney Barret was no different.
 
Last edited:
No. Feinstein commented on the judge’s writings which is appropriate, not on the judge’s religion. Can’t you tell the difference?

If you read the remarks you could see that they did not focus on Catholicism. You’re just wrong here. Checking a nominee’s impartiality is not bigotry.

You’re building a house on sand.
No religious tests, that’s the Constitution.
‘The dogma lives loudly within you’: Revisiting Barrett’s confirmation hearing.
‘The dogma lives loudly within you’: Revisiting Barrett’s confirmation hearing. - The New York Times.

Sure got me there, Feinstein wasn’t referring to religion. I’m building a house on sand.
 

Cruz: Dem Attacks on ACB ‘Twisted and Deranged’​

TRENT BAKER

4 Oct 2020

Sunday on Fox News Channel’s “Life, Liberty & Levin,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) sounded off on attacks aimed at Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett over her religious beliefs and decision to adopt children from Haiti.

Cruz called the criticisms “twisted and deranged.” He also warned the attacks will get “worse.” . . .

. . . but the kind of slime and personal attack — you know, for Brett Kavanaugh, he’s got two young daughters. The agony and the pressure that was put on his family was disgusting.”

“We’re already seeing Democratic operatives … attacking her young children, which is despicable and should be totally off-bounds, but the left views the court as … central to their agenda for America,” Cruz added before saying Democrats feel their “power to control America” is “in danger of slipping away.”

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top