One huge difference with Watergate - no one died when the Watergate Hotel was bugged.
Some other questions that need answers:
Exactly what was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi in the first place?
What was the late evening meeting with the Turkish diplomat about?
Why was this meeting held in the ‘less than secure’ location in Benghazi rather than at the Embassy in Tripoli?
If I were one to go for conspiracy theories this situation is ripe for one:
*Stevens is sent by Obama to arrange the transfer of Ghadaffi’s weapons to the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist organisations, particularly to the rebels in Syria, with assistance from Turkey.
Once Stevens has set this up, Obama sends in his hit squad, this time instead of a drone, his usual method of assassination, he uses the al-qaeda chapter his state department hired to ‘guard and protect’ Ambassador Stevens.
So intent is Obama on making sure that no one survives who can talk about what happened at that meeting that he issues the ‘stand down’ orders preventing assistance from arriving in time. Indeed, the men who died defending Ambassador Stevens had been given orders to stand down as well, but they disobeyed.
Help was deliberately withheld until all the Americans were dead. The fact that security was deliberately reduced prior to the meeting with the Turkish diplomat, on orders from Obama’s State Department, speaks volumes that Stevens was set up and the attack to remove him planned in advance.
Obama’s State Department issues the official lie about the ‘spontaneous protest mob angered by an obscure anti-Muslim video on youtube’ in an attempt to cover up their involvement both in setting up the attack, and in preventing help from arriving in time.*
Contrast Obama’s behaviour with his actions when he issued orders to ‘kill bin Laden’. In one case, he was glued to situation room, watching in real time, and in the other, he headed off to Vegas to party. Why? Why did he issue the ‘stand down’ orders? Why did he reduce security prior to the meeting? All of this is at Obama’s door, not one of his underlings. Who else has the authority to issue a ‘stand down’ order when American diplomatic personnel are under attack? some underling or the President?
breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/18/Benghazi-Why-It-Matters
It is now known that in the weeks prior to the attack, the United States State Department not only saw fit to reduce security for the consulate but refused repeated requests by Ambassador Stevens and Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom for fences, transportation assets, and special operations forces to augment security.
Benghazi Terror Attack: CIA Operatives Told Twice to Stand Down During Fight, Plot Thickens
CIA personnel led by ex-Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, who later lost his life in the attack during the September 11 Ansar al Sharia attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, disobeyed orders to “stand down.” Defying orders, Woods and other CIA personnel braved enemy fire to return to the consulate to rescue Ambassador Chris Stevens and information officer Sean Smith.
US Hired Al-Qaeda-Linked Group to Defend Benghazi Mission
The Libyan militia group that the State Department hired to defend its embattled diplomatic mission in Benghazi had clear al-Qaida sympathies, and had prominently displayed the al-Qaida flag on a Facebook page for months before the deadly attack.
Instead of listening to Obama’s words, just look at his actions. Forget what he said. Look at what he is doing.
***Everything ***he has done in the Middle East has helped the Muslim Brotherhood. This ‘Arab Spring’ nonsense has brought down stable governments across the region, with American assistance to the ‘rebels’, and replaced them with the unstable Muslim Brotherhood or a myriad of islamist groups vying to fill the power vacuums. None of these places are freer now than before their revolutions. Things are much worse for them, the ordinary citizens, now than when they were under their so-called dictators, especially for Christians and other non-Muslims.
Information sources say that the ‘rebels’ in Syria are predominately foreign fighters attached to various Islamist jihad organisations.
WAR ON SYRIA; 95 Percent Of ‘Syrian Rebels’ (FSA) Are Foreigners; German Intelligence Report
The
UN reports that it was
not Assad who used sarin but the rebels (who probably got it from Ghadaffi’s stores through the weapons conduit set up by Stevens at Obama’s orders in Benghazi).
