Democrats preparing three-tiered vote fraud scheme to destroy election integrity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Then why is it that the Democrats always support voting measures that invite the most fraud? Democrats amazingly don’t want to require voter identification, and they’re pushing mail-in ballots.


In 2005, panel co-chaired by Jimmy Carter found: ‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud’

Leftist media has really been outed in the Age of Donald Trump with their “Orange Man Bad” schtick. No matter what the president says, their instinctive responses are, ‘He’s wrong.’ ‘He’s lying.’ ‘He’s stupid.’ ‘He’s an oaf.’

The process of ballot harvesting should be illegal for very good reason. It violates the chain of custody, exposing the ballot to potential manipulation by campaign operatives or nonprofit political groups. They could harass voters to turn in ballots, assist them in filling them out, and potentially change ballots that don’t support the candidate the ballot harvester is paid to help.

The indication that ballot harvesting made the difference in California can be found in the vote proportions. Studies of absentee voters have consistently shown they tend to reflect the population or lean slightly to the right. But when ballot harvesting was deployed in California, we saw late ballots break heavily for Democrats .

The San Francisco Chronicle reported that elsewhere in the state, Orange County voters on election night 2018 were calling the registrar’s office asking if it was legitimate for someone to come to their door and ask if they could take their ballot.

Who was coming to the door? According to a January 2019 Los Angeles Times story, illegal Dreamers were deeply engaged in the process and not just delivering ballots, but helping voters fill them out .


Chances of increasing vote fraud are also why Democrats consistently oppose any Voter ID laws and other efforts to require people to prove who they are and that they have a right to vote as a citizen.
 
In 2005, panel co-chaired by Jimmy Carter found: ‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud’
This is just part of the story. A more complete story has been filled in recently by Jimmy Carter himself. He noted that the Carter Center this past May reported:
Carter Center:
“Fortunately, since 2005, many states have gained substantial experience in vote-by-mail and have shown how key concerns can be effectively addressed through appropriate planning, resources, training, and messaging.”
So while the 2005 report, which was 15 years ago, recommended certain safeguards to address the potential of fraud, it does not appear that today there is an inordinate risk of fraud.
 
Are you serious Leaf? I have reported problem upon problem with vote by mail in primaries here.

Some of these problems have been logistical, other probably dishonest, others outright fraudulent.

If there are problems with absentee ballots (some of which there has been), how much MORE PROBLEM with vote by mail (which we have also seen problems with).

The “considerable experience” argument does not cut it. At least with me.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic . . .
The “considerable experience” argument does not cut it. At least with me.
LeafByNiggle . . .
Well, it did with the Carter Center.
Then the “Carter Center” obviously got it wrong.

The Carter Center is not set up for in America.

This is all political posturing if they are saying this.

The “Carter Center” has no direct influence on me.

I’m sure if Don Jr. began a vote-monitor group and said the opposite,
you’d get right behind him. Right Leaf? 😉

To everybody else. The mail-in ballot game is attempted manipulation by the national leftists for their political gain.
 
Last edited:
Considering that 1cthlctrth referenced the Panel that included Carter as an authority, it seems ironic to deny the Carter Center’s legitimacy when what they say is inconvenient. Either accept what Carter says or don’t. You can’t have it both ways. But the only ones saying that mail-in voting is fraudulent are those that are openly Trump apologists. But if you listen to the Secretaries of State in the states like Colorado they are confident that they have adequate safeguards in place. I will also note that although the present Secretary of State of Colorado is a Democrat, the previous two holders of this office were both Republicans, and in 2013 under Republican SoS Scott Gessler Colorado extended their mail-in voting by sending ballots to all registered voters. I will also note that Utah is about as Republican as you can get since 1985. Yet Utah also has mail-in voting as their primary means of voting. So mail-in voting is neither new nor exclusively Democratic. It is not a leftist plot. It is embraced by Republicans too.
 
Last edited:
Well you know from prior posts I have never accepted Carter (or his “Center”) on this.

So WHY start conflating me with another poster Leaf? Conservatives are not monolithic.

I don’t accept Carter here.
 
Last edited:
I disagree about you thinking the right gives much support to this vote-by-mail scam.
 
signatures didn’t match.
This will be a problem, for sure. I have trouble matching mine. The bank calls me to verify checks of large amounts. They ask me to print my name along side.
 
I disagree about you thinking the right gives much support to this vote-by-mail scam.
How do you explain Utah, a state full of Republicans? Or Colorado, a purple state that extended mail-in voting under a Republican? In Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota and West Virginia, GOP officials are expanding vote by mail. This is not a national issue. It is a state issue. The states are deciding for themselves. In the largest expansion of vote by mail in Georgia’s history, its Republican secretary of state sent applications to every active voter, despite protests from the speaker of the Georgia house, David Ralston. Kobach, Kansas’ former secretary of state, became prominent by promoting unsupported claims of rampant voter fraud. Yet parts of Kansas, where he is now running for U.S. Senate, are encouraging vote by mail.
 
Last edited:
And it now is the only option,prior to that we could vote n person ,not anymore
 
Cathoholic to LeafByNiggle . . . .
I disagree about you thinking the right gives much support to this vote-by-mail scam.
LeafByNiggle changing my first premise (that is the fallacy of equivocation) . . . .
How do you explain Utah, a state full of Republicans?
Bold mine. Leaf fallaciously CHANGED my premise from “the right” (mine)
to “Republicans” (Leaf’s invention).
.

I explain it as I have explained this to you many times before (in principle).

There are no right wingers among the Democrat Party. At least nationally (and very few on a state level).

There are MANY LEFT wing people in the Republican Party.
 
Last edited:
I keep getting Trump letters so I know the mail is working.
I do, too.

I really want to send back the return envelopes empty so the campaign has to pay for the postage, but I’m not the kind of person.

However, the mail runs late nowadays.

Does everyone know about Informed Delivery? Sign up for it with the USPS, and every morning you get an email with pictures of the envelopes you’re getting that day. You can also see them on the website.
 
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. — More than a dozen counties in Pennsylvania have seen election directors or deputy directors leave in the last year since a new law was passed to accommodate no-excuse mail-in voting across the state, three county officials familiar with the movement tell NBC News.

“The general assembly, the courts, and the governor have created a s—show of an election. Nobody truly understands what’s what,” one county election official said, “nobody has a grasp.”

The heightened concern comes after the Keystone State took weeks to report its primary results in June and as local election officials face ever-changing demands on the election process this year. With less than 45 days to go until the general election, the race in the battleground state is expected to be tight and top Pennsylvania elections officials have already said not to expect results on election night.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top