Democrats preparing three-tiered vote fraud scheme to destroy election integrity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
1cthlctrth said:
Then why is it that the Democrats always support voting measures that invite the most fraud?
Click to expand...
more supposition, no proof of either Democrats supporting any different measures, nor proof that the measures “invite” fraud. You have a study in hand that shows people’s desire to commit fraud when exposed to certain measures. You don’t? Yeah, there aren’t any.
1cthlctrth said:
Democrats amazingly don’t want to require voter identification
Click to expand...
There are people in both parties who are averse to having to show an ID to do anything.
1cthlctrth said:
Chances of increasing vote fraud are also why Democrats consistently oppose any Voter ID laws and other efforts to require people to prove who they are and that they have a right to vote as a citizen.
Click to expand...
more accusation, no proof that one party wants to increase voter fraud

You are perhaps a bit biased, no? 😆
 
A friend who sells stuff on eBay reports seeing a warning whenever he goes to the eBay shipping dialog that the USPS is advising that delivery is going to be slow and made slower by the volume of mail they’re dealing with.

I haven’t sold anything on eBay in a couple of years so this is a secondhand anecdote. Any eBay sellers want to chime in here?

The USPS already has a number of documented screw ups that lead us to believe their infrastructure isn’t ready for this and that four months was far too insufficient for the amount of time to make it so. What’s to keep the Democrats from picking up undelivered ballots and filling them out themselves? Then stuffing unregulated and unsecured “pickup” boxes? They’ve all but promised us they will do that at least in the battleground states. Welcome to the banana republic …
 
1cthlctrth . . .
Then why is it that the Democrats always support voting measures that invite the most fraud?
Click to expand...
Great question 1cthlctrth.

I think when your party goes to bat in support of
dismembering innocent pre-born babies,
voter fraud is a “piece of cake”.
 
“Deadlines” are now not “deadlines”.

(And this is merely with “absentee ballots”.
How much worse will this be with a wide, vote-by-mail set up?)

Just what I would expect with this.

.

Judge Allows Extra Week for Counting Wisconsin Absentee Ballots​

466

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Unsplash/Alex Perz

BREITBART NEWS

21 Sep 20201,245

1:22

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge ruled Monday absentee ballots in battleground Wisconsin can be counted up to six days after the Nov. 3 presidential election as long as they are postmarked by Election Day.

The highly anticipated ruling, unless overturned, means that the outcome of the presidential race in Wisconsin likely will not be known for days after polls close.

Under current law, the deadline for returning an absentee ballot in order to have it counted is 8 p.m. on Election Day.

Democrats and their allies sued to extend the deadline in the key swing state.

U.S. District Judge William Conley granted a large portion of their requests . . .
Click to expand...
www.breitbart.com

Judge Allows Extra Week for Counting Wisconsin Absentee Ballots

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge ruled Monday absentee ballots in battleground Wisconsin can be counted up to six days after the Nov. 3 presidential | Politics
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
I guess I don’t understand the complaint. Normal business practices have always accepted payments, signed contracts, tax returns, etc. as long as they were postmarked before a certain date. Why should the delivery performance of the post office be the main issue here? The mailer has no control over that.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
I think when your party goes to bat in support of
dismembering innocent pre-born babies,
voter fraud is a “piece of cake”.
Click to expand...
And yet, the most recent absentee/mail in fraud was perpetrated by a Republican. Go figure.
 
PaulinVA . . .
And yet, the most recent absentee/mail in fraud . .
Click to expand...
To this I would say two things.

One. I am glad you are admitting fraud occurs here. (You want to PROTECT AGAINST potential avenues of fraud. Right?)

Two. By you pointing out this was a Republican . . . Do you think that somehow makes a difference to me because it was Republican fraud??

I don’t think that way PaulinVA.
 
Who was the Republican accused of voter fraud,I’m not aware of anyone
 
Democrats preparing three-tiered vote fraud scheme to destroy election integrity
Click to expand...

Republican Scare Tactics !!!​

Move on, nothing new under the Sun.
 
The scare tactics are justifiable.The fraudulent Dem tactics are business as usual,I agree
 
And we can equally say the fraudulent Rep tactics are business as usual, I agree.
 
Good point. Last election CA, WA, and NY were still counting absentee ballots till well into December.
 
:woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2::woman_facepalming:t2:
 
Rep. Jim Jordan: Democrats Are “Trying to Win the Election After the Election”

 
Wow! 13,000 mail-in ballots with post-mark problems in only one Congressional district!

Thanks for posting this good information Caldera.

 
Last edited:
Now Bloomberg is going to invest millions in paying off the debts of felons in Fl…This way they are elegible to vote! This is illegal and the Dems are doing it in plain site.
And anybody who questions why the Republicans feel the urgency in filling the SCOTUS seat,just look at what is gong on by the ,eftist Dems in their attenpt to steal the election.
 
Last edited:
1cthlctrth said:
Chances of increasing vote fraud are also why Democrats consistently oppose any Voter ID laws and other efforts to require people to prove who they are and that they have a right to vote as a citizen.
Click to expand...
Democrats oppose voter id requirements because of poll taxes, levies that were widely used to discriminate against minorities. Instead of equal justice under the law, legislatures created conditions that allowed them to manipulate who was allowed to vote.
Jeanne_S said:
Now Bloomberg is going to invest millions in paying off the debts of felons in Fl…This way they are elegible to vote! This is illegal and the Dems are doing it in plain site.
Click to expand...
How is this illegal? Felons who have fulfilled the terms of their punishment are allowed to vote. Fines are considered part of their punishment, so paying on their behalf is a way to rehabilitate them and allow them to participate in society.

Bloomberg is not a Democrat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top