Is he entitled to the protection of civil right act of 1964?
The civil right act exists. Are you disputing that? So what does that say about him does get the same protection others do? He is less than human?
But that was never MY argument.
Irrelevant. That was never Robert’s point. Nor is it what Robert said.
No it isn’t. The argument is you said he has ‘NO’ rights under ‘ANY’ discrimination law.
In regards to speech, he has no protection under any sort of discrimination laws. If you disagree, then present evidence to the contrary.stinkcat_14:
No it isn’t. The argument is you said he has ‘NO’ rights under ‘ANY’ discrimination law.
Are you denying you said that?
Does DT have tattoos? Since the argument is about DT’s rights let’s get to something we do know. He is over 70. I think we agree on that. It’s been reported all over the media. So if he applied at a telemarking company to be a call taker, could the company say ‘No, your too old.’ In the past you argued he has ‘NO’ rights under ‘ANY’ discrimination law. So your saying the company could deny him a job based on age?
You said ‘any’ law. Are backtracking from that statement?
I showed you what the topic was here.
And rational people cannot argue with that kind of irrationality.
The topic was his spray on tan and calling him Cheeto.stinkcat_14:
Does DT have tattoos? Since the argument is about DT’s rights let’s get to something we do know. He is over 70. I think we agree on that. It’s been reported all over the media. So if he applied at a telemarking company to be a call taker, could the company say ‘No, your too old.’ In the past you argued he has ‘NO’ rights under ‘ANY’ discrimination law. So your saying the company could deny him a job based on age?
The argument was about was about Trump’s rights being protected. Did you or did you not say this?
You are continuing to deny you said these things?
Do you have any sense of shame at all for this dehumanizing statement? This admission that you will try to advance a position by using a racist statement? That you will dehumanize someone because your hatred for him is so strong?
None whatsoever.
Just what racist statement did I make? I actually never have called him “cheeto”, but even if I did, it would not be racist because orange is not a race. Even if it was racist and I decided to call him that, is it worse than calling Elizabeth Warren Pocahantas? I don’t see how it is.
Actually, I would argue that I don’t have any hatred for Don. My feelings towards Don as an individual are the same as my feelings towards Hillary or Elizabeth. Do I hate them as well? How do you define hate? If it is appropriate for Don to call Chuck Schumer a clown (which I found rather humorous) why is wrong that I am not outraged when people call Don “cheeto”? Can you cite the Catechism where I am sinning by not being offended?
All I can say about is WOW! You have no sense of right and wrong that your ok with people making racist statements?
Or:
Another example of the tolerant left!robertmidwest:
It doesn’t matter if it is racist or not. Trump has no protections under any sort of discrimination laws. Anything one says about him is fair game.
No kidding!!! “I don’t care if it’s racist. He’s saying it about somebody I hate!”
Warren is going to be easy to beat.
If someone had made a racist statement about Michelle Obama would we get:
Another example of trump supporters bearing false witness. Time to put up or shut up, name one liberal policy I support. Have you no shame? What right do you have to make false allegations?stinkcat_14:
Another example of the tolerant left!robertmidwest:
It doesn’t matter if it is racist or not. Trump has no protections under any sort of discrimination laws. Anything one says about him is fair game.
First of all, anyone with the smallest amount of intelligence would know that calling someone’s Cheeto is not racist. So why should I care about whether you think calling him Cheeto is racist, when it is based on an uninformed opinion.7_Sorrows:
No kidding!!! “I don’t care if it’s racist. He’s saying it about somebody I hate!”