F
falisrm
Guest
I’m not judging anyone, its a matter of following correct principles, which some of these agencies don’t know anything about.
lol, what correct principles are those? Are they in the Bible somewhere?I’m not judging anyone, its a matter of following correct principles, which some of these agencies don’t know anything about.
So the correct principle is “giving is dependent upon the recipient behaving in a proper manner”, like in the following post?I’m not judging anyone, its a matter of following correct principles, which some of these agencies don’t know anything about.
Looks to me like you’re the one calling the poor on their behavior.The thing was the father or the family didn’t have to do a single thing to try and become self reliant. He wasn’t encouraged to do anything to support himself or his family like get a second job or develop a skill to get a higher salary. They just wrote to thank us for the extra money. Since when in the world is it a sin to be poor?
so you are telling me that no LDS general authorities are involved in any charitable efforts of the LDS church? please. SLC is ALWAYS involved. there is also the costs of utilities like water, electricity, gas, phone, etc.No, your wrong. There are no paid welfare workers in the humanitarian program. If your talking about the social services program of the church, they hire lawyers or therapists for things like adoption or addiction meetings. Those are paid professionals, but other then that no one gets any financial salary. The whole $250 million PEF fund is run by volunteers, all the way to the highest manager who developed the program is a volunteer.
If you want to talk about effectiveness, i would gladly do that.
Which is nothing that Christ ever taught.No, i’m saying there is no progress to an individual or a family who doesn’t have to strive to be free and independant and find the joy in supporting your own family. As a short term basis, that is fine. But to have it where the family receives this long term aid until the kids are out of the house. 10 to 18 years is a joke. It doesn’t “benefit” anyone.
But if the family is in need of immediate aid to feed themselves to sustain life of if there is a shortage due to natural dissaster, of course all aid should be available as much as possible for as long as possible because it takes years to become self reliant again.
It would be more effective to have long term aid to help families become more self reliant and more capable of providing for themselves in whatever way possible.
These are just simple principles about welfare and as a way of being effective
If it were true, then you are saying the catholic church was willing to sell out their principles for $$$$$$$?So are you calling the cathedral clergy liars…they told me!
In the Cathedral there are two murals to the side of the high altar…one is the text, " If I or an angel from Heaven preach to you another Gospel and the other is Matthew16:16.
Brilliant …by the way the dediacation to Mary Magdelene was chosen …as the Mormons ntered the valley on he Feast day in 1847.
After reading up on CRS activities in the Phillippines I find your questionable.Thats probably the biggest discussion. I contributed to the CRS program before and its nothing more then a socialist program. We started helping a poor family in the Philippines. So we supplimented their income by 20%. The thing was the father or the family didn’t have to do a single thing to try and become self reliant. He wasn’t encouraged to do anything to support himself or his family like get a second job or develop a skill to get a higher salary. They just wrote to thank us for the extra money. Since when in the world is it a sin to be poor? This is effective at all. Its just like what any socialist country does and give handouts. There’s no progress or development. If everyone was involved in CRS, half the world would be “dependant” on the other half. It was one of the most ineffective things i have ever seen in my life so we stopped.
Why?Naturally, the next question is about effectiveness and the actual aid money.
My next question would be: how humbly to they give?I learned here they do give a ton. And i mentioned that several times. I thought i knew the majority of the aid programs like CRS but i was way off. Naturally, the next question is about effectiveness and the actual aid money.
The flood happened just a few months back in Washington state. And the thing about the Bishop’s storehouse also happened recently although another incident concerning aid from it only being given to a Mormon (even though the person was in need) was from several years ago.Did those floods happen to be in Washington State or Oregon?