Did You Boycott Church? "Sunday w/o women"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric_Olsen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If only we can have this Sunday Without Feminists evolve into Sunday Without Dissidents.

FYI - It had zero impact in my parish.
 
80% sounds about right. However, your “good riddance” remark seems wrong. Be careful what you wish for.

I don’t agree that there are too many EMHC’s. I can’t imagine how most parishes could have three or more services on a Sunday morning (not unusual) if each service were extended for 15 minutes or more so that everyone can receive communion from the hands of a priest. I really don’t think that Jesus is offended by the touch of a faithful lay person’s finger more than the touch of a faithful lay person’s tongue. Moreover, many sick and homebound Catholics would not be able to receive communion without the ministry of EMHC’s, the majority of which are women.

I take it that your “good riddance” extends to women involved in other liturgical ministries (sacristans, lectors, musicians and choir, caring for the linens, greeters, etc.), catechetical ministry (DREs, classroom teachers, RCIA, sacramental preparation), leadership (Parish Council, etc.), fundraising, etc., etc. Without women, the Church just wouldn’t function.
A thought: why not reduce the homily time and make Communion more sacred as it should be? The Eucharist (Jesus) is the center of our faith, should He not be given the most time when we receive Him?
 
wow…just wow…send all those women our way. We’re not afraid of ovaries in the pulpit.👍
That is why I don’t understand the controversy. There are so many religions out there, why not pick one that is more in line with your views?
 
A thought: why not reduce the homily time and make Communion more sacred as it should be? The Eucharist (Jesus) is the center of our faith, should He not be given the most time when we receive Him?
Great point. I was told by an old priest that if a priest can’t say what he needs to say in 7 minutes during a homily he can’t say it at all.
 
That is why I don’t understand the controversy. There are so many religions out there, why not pick one that is more in line with your views?
I think these woman still believe that the Catholic Church is the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, however poor their obedience to the the same is. 😦
 
I think these woman still believe that the Catholic Church is the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, however poor their obedience to the the same is. 😦
They need to realize that there will never be female priests in the Catholic Church. It’s never going to happen because it is theologically incorrect.
 
I think these woman still believe that the Catholic Church is the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, however poor their obedience to the the same is. 😦
Yes, but the changes they want would change the Church to something completely unrecognizable.

If you prefer to play soccer over football then that is your choice and nobody will think less of you. But it would be strange to lobby every American football club to start playing the game they call football properly, you know, with your feet using a round ball that you try to kick in a goal. They already have people who are willing to play along with these women so maybe they should just stick with them.
 
Yes, but the changes they want would change the Church to something completely unrecognizable.
I disagree. They want to limit the authority of the Pope, ordain women, and soft-peddle the parts of the gospel that might offend modern sensibilities. I’d recognize that anywhere. They want to change the Church into the church of England. Not since the Minbari surrender at the battle of the line has such a strategy been seen!
 
I disagree. They want to limit the authority of the Pope, ordain women, and soft-peddle the parts of the gospel that might offend modern sensibilities. I’d recognize that anywhere. They want to change the Church into the church of England. Not since the Minbari surrender at the battle of the line has such a strategy been seen!
Yes, that is what I meant to say. 😃 They already have plenty of churches, excuse me, ecclesial communities, that are already in agreement with them. Why waste your energy on such a Quixotic effort as trying to change the Catholic Church?
 
wow…just wow…send all those women our way. We’re not afraid of ovaries in the pulpit.👍
I suppose there are those ‘communities’ that could care less about theology and truth and would prefer raw numbers. (shrugs)
 
Great point. I was told by an old priest that if a priest can’t say what he needs to say in 7 minutes during a homily he can’t say it at all.
Exactly. The Bible passages speak well enough and can be supplemented with 5-10 minutes of Homily time. That way we Catholics can spend more time in Communion with the Lord. I go to daily Mass twice a week. Those Masses are 20-25 mins long, tops. The Homily is perhaps 1-2 mins, sometimes no Homily at all. I never walk away feeling like I was missing something because I heard the Word of God and then received Him during Communion.
 
Just one of the differences that make you Lutheran and us Catholic; another related difference is the interview/selection process and hiring of a Lutheran pastor rather than the Bishop assigning one.
If I remember correctly, Lutheranteach is in an ELCA Lutheran (the majority of US Lutherans). Before I converted, I was too. They have many practices we would consider liberal (allow openly homosexual pastors, clergy healthcare plans cover abortion for any reason, “open table” communion, oppose pro-marriage laws, etc.)

LCMS Lutherans (the second largest US group) are very different on all these points.
 
That is why I don’t understand the controversy. There are so many religions out there, why not pick one that is more in line with your views?
It is a dichotomy. I presume they understand that they are already in the one, true Church instituted by Jesus Himself. On the other hand, they don’t agree with how Jesus set it up. :banghead:
 
.The only reason that I know against ordaining women to the priesthood is that the Church wasn’t authorized to confer that sacrament on women. That’s what the Church teaches, and because it’s sufficient, that’s the end of the matter. But I really don’t understand the notion that if the Church was authorized to do so, women would be in some way unable to function effectively.
The reason for no “priestesses” is simple enough:
Among other things, the Church is the Bride of Christ.
The priest take the place of Christ the Bridegroom.
Through the Mass and the Sacraments, the Bridegroom gives Life to His Bride.
To confer Life, the Marital Embrace must be between Man and Woman.
A relationship between a “priestess” and the Bride would be barren…one speaker called it “liturgical lesbianism”.
Read Ephesians 5:25-32.
I take it that his “them” means the de facto protestants who organized the “protest.” Although that might encompass some women (as it also includes some men), it didn’t appear aimed at women generally, and that his “good riddance” extends accordingly. As we saw this Sunday, it would seem, most of the women involved in the ministries you describe are unimpressed with the protesting dissenters.
You`re right.
It was aimed exclusively at the radical feminists and their lackeys.
See Post #14 to see what i think of radical feminism.
 
The reason for no “priestesses” is simple enough:
Among other things, the Church is the Bride of Christ.
The priest take the place of Christ the Bridegroom.
Through the Mass and the Sacraments, the Bridegroom gives Life to His Bride.
To confer Life, the Marital Embrace must be between Man and Woman.
A relationship between a “priestess” and the Bride would be barren…one speaker called it “liturgical lesbianism”.
Read Ephesians 5:25-32.
True we say that the priest acts in persona Christi. But we also say that the priest acts in persona ecclesiae. Thus, while “[t]he priest take the place of Christ the Bridegroom,” he also takes the place of the Church, the bride, which undercuts the force of your point.

I don’t think we’re really in disagreement, though. By one route or another, your point (and mine) is that as scripture witnesses, the Church wasn’t authorized to ordain women. That’s not quite the same thing as the point I made to which you replied. I was saying that I don’t understand the notion that women couldn’t function as clerics if they were called to the priesthood. (Indeed, to conflate the distinct issues of women’s capacity to serve with their call is actually to concede the feminists’ point.)

That’s a moot point, of course, since we both accept the Church’s teaching that they aren’t. But the issue isn’t entirely academic, insofar as it tends to escape its bounds and to cast a pall over their ability to serve in lay leadership roles.
 
… Some very stimulating comments 👍

Here, we might have seen it as just another excuse for them to bring their kids to a Sunday morning hockey practice, or game. I’m not sure exactly when this started, but it seems like all kids’ hockey practices and games are on Sunday morning now … (somebody definitely wasn’t thinking “Mass”).
If only we can have this Sunday Without Feminists evolve into Sunday Without Dissidents.

FYI - It had zero impact in my parish.
It doesn’t scare you that we might be left with a little too much (ahem, ;)) elbow room ?
Great point. I was told by an old priest that if a priest can’t say what he needs to say in 7 minutes during a homily he can’t say it at all.
(lol I ) A deacon friend of mine once told me that when he was studying , his homiletics teacher instructed him, “If you haven’t struck oil in 8 minutes, quit boring !”

I wonder if they’re trying to make it look bigger than it really is in the media ? And I so agree with the comments posted about how they must be missing the whole gyst of their faith by “boycotting” Mass (maybe they should change that word to “girlcotting” instead so it will appear less offensive).

My dear mother was liberated/feminist (call it what you want) . During large parts of her career, she worked and travelled 5-6 days a week . But she never saw any of what she felt was her “equality” or “freedom” translate into a need to become a priest. She never saw the ministerial priesthood as something a woman is called to. And she was compassionate towards two particular priests who struggled with their vocation.

Anyone who seriously thinks our Blessed Lord calls women to the ministerial priesthood, should be left without an answer when asked how this sweet Saviour could have overlooked His own pure Mother . She would have been the first.

These women are bitter and they need prayer. Here’s a quote from the OP’s linked article:

“September 26 is the day to boycott Mass and pray for greater inclusion of women in the Catholic church.”

It really is questionable whether these truly are women of faith, or whether they are people who have already stepped outside the Church and only think they haven’t left.

To think we could boycott the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass - a prayer so great that the human mind cannot comprehend it in its entirety (if we may use the word entirety for something with* infinite *merits) , and somehow come up with a prayer which could ever be even greater or more pertinent, speaks volumes to me about these people’s woundedness.
 
Exactly. The Bible passages speak well enough and can be supplemented with 5-10 minutes of Homily time. That way we Catholics can spend more time in Communion with the Lord. I go to daily Mass twice a week. Those Masses are 20-25 mins long, tops. The Homily is perhaps 1-2 mins, sometimes no Homily at all. I never walk away feeling like I was missing something because I heard the Word of God and then received Him during Communion.
While I agree that the Eucharist is the “source and summit” of Catholic faith, I don’t agree with the notion that the Liturgy of the Word should be reduced by cutting the homily to 5-10 minutes or less. A common complaint is that Catholics are ignorant of the truths of the Faith. The homily is the best opportunity that the Church has of teaching people those truths and helping them understand how to put them into practice. I’ve been at a number of streamlined masses that did away with the homily and sped up everything else. Not a great experience and certainly not a model for what the mass should be.
 
In regards to the article…wow…
If these women don’t even know the theology as to why we go to mass and why they cannot willfully miss it, it makes perfect sense that they don’t know the theology behind the priest being a man.
How sad and appalling.
 
While I agree that the Eucharist is the “source and summit” of Catholic faith, I don’t agree with the notion that the Liturgy of the Word should be reduced by cutting the homily to 5-10 minutes or less. A common complaint is that Catholics are ignorant of the truths of the Faith. The homily is the best opportunity that the Church has of teaching people those truths and helping them understand how to put them into practice. I’ve been at a number of streamlined masses that did away with the homily and sped up everything else. Not a great experience and certainly not a model for what the mass should be.
If it cannot be said in ten minutes, than you will lose people anyway. Most people have about a ten-minute attention span, like it or not that is just true. Homilies that go on-and-on for 20, 30 and even 40 minutes are most often a waste of time and effort because the vast majority in the pews tune-out after ten minutes. It also shows a lack of efficiency if one cannot keep a homily to ten minutes or less (fifteen minutes maximum). Do not forget, in this era of longer homilies we find people know their faith less well than they did in the past; therefore, longer homilies has not worked to increase the knowledge of faith.

I agree that the Liturgy of the Word is critical, yet the most important part is the actual reading and hearing of the Bible passages. Not the homily.

There is zero doubt the most important part of the Mass is Communion and it should be treated as such. Give it more time and reverence, teach people that hearing the Word of God and than receiving God into their bodies is precisely what the Mass is all about.

There are others ways to save time. Stop having so many Extraordinary Ministers during Communion. Each EM represents another card vessel to be cleaned and put away, requiring mor altar servers too, and requiring 5-10 mins post-Communion time just to “finish.” If parishses cut back on homily time, and used Ems less, they could save at least 10-15 mins, which could then be used for a more reverent and proper treatment of Communion. Of course: imo. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top