Disrespect of the Holy Mother

  • Thread starter Thread starter convertmjh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Anglo-catholic:
Why all the multiple personallities (Our Lady of This - Our Lady of That) Are they not the same person?
To add to what hlgomez said. The Danish have a saying: “beloved Children have many names.” Mary is a most beloved daugher of God so it’s appropriate she would have many titles. I know this is anecdotal. But it’s mine. 🙂
 
Gosh… can’t they think straight? Some comments thrown by today’s Protestants can be very insulting – not especially to Catholics, but to the Blessed Mother! Unbelievable! Surely, if I insult your mother for a reason or another, you wouldn’t like me, would you?
*
“Let no one presume mercy from God, who offends His holy Mother.” * – St. Louis Marie deMontfort.
 
Someone mentioned that the Immaculate conception is not scriptural. The Angel Gabriel Said “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you.” (Lk 1:28 RSV-CE) According to Scott Hahn this is a title, as if the Angel is naming her full of grace. The word grace there, I believe is applied to Jesus in another passage. Seems to me that this grace points to Our Lady as being free of Original Sin. The Assumption is found in Revelation 12:1 “A great portent appeared in heavan, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.” Sounds like Mary in bodily form in Heaven to me. Do protestants accept that the prophet Elijah was assumed into heaven? Scripture says he was in 2 Kings 2:9-12. It’s not unprecedented. Just some thoughts brothers and sisters.
 
Someone mentioned that the Immaculate conception is not scriptural. The Angel Gabriel Said “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you.” (Lk 1:28 RSV-CE) According to Scott Hahn this is a title, as if the Angel is naming her full of grace. The word grace there, I believe is applied to Jesus in another passage. Seems to me that this grace points to Our Lady as being free of Original Sin. The Assumption is found in Revelation 12:1 “A great portent appeared in heavan, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.” Sounds like Mary in bodily form in Heaven to me. Do protestants accept that the prophet Elijah was assumed into heaven? Scripture says he was. It’s not unprecedented. Just some thoughts brothers and sisters.
 
It sounds to me that you all believe that the acceptance of these doctrines (Immaculate Conception and Assumption) are necessary for salvation. I guess no one was saved by reading the Gospels.

Don’t each and every one of you receive and carry the living Christ in your unworthy sinful bodies at every Eucharist? The Ark carried the artifacts of God not God. You can’t keep Him boxed up.

I believe I am correct that I don’t have to accept the pious statements of the St Louis, etc. as infallible.

What about all the saints (like Aquinas) who did not accept these concepts before they were doctrinalized?What about the Eastern Orthodox who have valid orders but are not **required ** to accept these doctrines. (I am not saying the doctrine is wrong - I’m just saying the church existed for over 1850 years without this belief being mandatory.)

Do you really believe everyone (Protestant) who questions Roman Catholic beliefs are predators seeking the ruin of your souls? If so you should start forming another Crusade rather than discussing Ecumenism.

As stated by Serafin - anything can be taken to extremes. Do you get offended when someone burys St Joseph on his head to sell their house, or people parade a statue through the streets and pin money to it?
We seem to have more animosity towards fellow Christians than to atheists. See you all in heaven.
 
40.png
Anglo-catholic:
Do you really believe everyone (Protestant) who questions Roman Catholic beliefs are predators seeking the ruin of your souls? If so you should start forming another Crusade rather than discussing Ecumenism.
I agree. If Protestants are such predators and if all they want to do it set snares for Catholics, why doesn’t the Catholic church start another Inquisition to exterminate the world of such a threat? With the hundreds of years that the Catholic church hunted down, persecuted, tortured, and killed those who would not adhere to the doctrines of the Catholic church, is it any wonder that the descendents of those people would have animosity and contempt toward the Catholic church? Yet, the Catholic church claims that it is the continuation of the church founded by Christ, despite its gross crimes for hundreds of years against humanity. Are you people serious?
 
Mothers Boy:
Someone mentioned that the Immaculate conception is not scriptural. The Angel Gabriel Said “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you.” (Lk 1:28 RSV-CE) According to Scott Hahn this is a title, as if the Angel is naming her full of grace. The word grace there, I believe is applied to Jesus in another passage. Seems to me that this grace points to Our Lady as being free of Original Sin. The Assumption is found in Revelation 12:1 “A great portent appeared in heavan, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.” Sounds like Mary in bodily form in Heaven to me. Do protestants accept that the prophet Elijah was assumed into heaven? Scripture says he was. It’s not unprecedented. Just some thoughts brothers and sisters.
In what version of the Bible does it say, “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you”? I have not found it in any version I have looked in. I have found the following in the Luke 1:28 of the Catholic Version of the NRSV, “And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.’” But being favored does not make you without original sin.
 
rod of iron:
I agree. If Protestants are such predators and if all they want to do it set snares for Catholics, why doesn’t the Catholic church start another Inquisition to exterminate the world of such a threat? With the hundreds of years that the Catholic church hunted down, persecuted, tortured, and killed those who would not adhere to the doctrines of the Catholic church, is it any wonder that the descendents of those people would have animosity and contempt toward the Catholic church? Yet, the Catholic church claims that it is the continuation of the church founded by Christ, despite its gross crimes for hundreds of years against humanity. Are you people serious?
I see a system here of throwing everything including the kitchen sink into this thread. The objections are too many to deal with at one time - if you are seeking truth and are willing to hear what is said, maybe this should be a new thread?
 
rod of iron:
In what version of the Bible does it say, “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you”? I have not found it in any version I have looked in. I have found the following in the Luke 1:28 of the Catholic Version of the NRSV, “And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.’” But being favored does not make you without original sin.
The Douay-Rheims, for one:
And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

This is a far better translation of the original (in THIS particular passage) than most.
 
I was Protestant for most of my life, and I can honestly tell you that I never met a Protestant who did not respect Mary (I ran in pretty fundamentalist circles - A of G and Southern Baptist)

What Protestants were fighting was the presumed idolatry on the part of Catholics in their worship of Mary.

The outward signs that Protestants see are sensational reports of Mary in the mildew in the shower curtain, and thousands of Catholics flocking to see it, or 100 foot traveling statues of the Blessed Mother.

They do not hear about the intercessary role of Mary. Often poorly catechized Catholics will tell Protestants that they worship her.

To be fair, those who have a devotion to Mary need to respectfully let others know about true devotion to her and to encourage other Catholics to have a theologically sound devotion to her.
It’s good to correct misperceptions, but it is also important for Catholics to present their beliefs accurately.

God Bless,
Iguana
 
But Mary did not die so I can be forgiven of my sins. I can’t receive my atonement from the shedding of her blood. Why then should I give her any more respect or vereration than I would to any other human that God has created?

Jesus saves me, not Mary.
 
40.png
Katholikos:
Love them, pray for them, don’t go near them unless you are a good apologist and solid in your own faith, they’ll lay a trap for you. They’re predators.
I finally focused my eyeballs on the problem. I shouldn’t have used the offending pronoun “they,” which would mean all Protestants. I should have written "some may lay a trap for you, some are predators. " I didn’t mean to indict all Protestants in my statement. Many, many are loving Christians and are definitely not predators. But I was trained in predatory tactics, and there are many more like me out there, waiting to rob Catholics of their faith.

Sorry. I didn’t “see” that although I had read it several times until chimakuni’s post. Thanks, friend.

JMJ Jay
 
rod of iron:
But Mary did not die so I can be forgiven of my sins. I can’t receive my atonement from the shedding of her blood. Why then should I give her any more respect or vereration than I would to any other human that God has created?

Jesus saves me, not Mary.
Straw man argument - Catholicism doesn’t teach that Mary dies for your sins.

For us, it’s not an “either/or” choice, it’s a “both/and”. Jesus died for our sins and we respect Mary for her special place in history. Not a “saving” part, but a special, honored place in the story of our savior.

“All generations shall call me blessed” - our Blessed Mother.

Do you get jealous if someone mentions your mother, say someone complemented you by saying what a great job your mother did in raising you - will you be offended? Is taking offense to that statement a Christian thing to do? God doesn’t hoard glory like some earthly king.
 
40.png
iguana27:
I was Protestant for most of my life, and I can honestly tell you that I never met a Protestant who did not respect Mary (I ran in pretty fundamentalist circles - A of G and Southern Baptist)

What Protestants were fighting was the presumed idolatry on the part of Catholics in their worship of Mary.

The outward signs that Protestants see are sensational reports of Mary in the mildew in the shower curtain, and thousands of Catholics flocking to see it, or 100 foot traveling statues of the Blessed Mother.

They do not hear about the intercessary role of Mary. Often poorly catechized Catholics will tell Protestants that they worship her.

To be fair, those who have a devotion to Mary need to respectfully let others know about true devotion to her and to encourage other Catholics to have a theologically sound devotion to her.
It’s good to correct misperceptions, but it is also important for Catholics to present their beliefs accurately.

God Bless,
Iguana
Catholics and Protestants are separated by a common language. We use words differently, and the same words may have a different meaning – “grace” for example. We also have different worldviews. It makes a huge difference how one perceives reality if one believes in Total Depravity, for example. The Catholic sees man as only a little lower than the angels – wounded by original sin but basically very good. A little baptismal water and he’ll be regenerated – restored to the condition of Adam and Eve before the fall by Sanctifying Grace. Many Protestants believe that man has no free will and that even his prayers are displeasing to God because of the Fall. As Luther put it, man is like a “snow-covered dunghill” – covered over with Christ’s righteousness but underneath, he’s still just a pile of manure.

I’ve heard women – particularly Hispanics – say they ‘worship’ Mary. But they don’t mean that they think she’s a goddess. She’s only a human being and they know that. Her only power is prayer – and it’s her powerful prayer that causes the hyperbole. Worship is a word that has undergone a redefinition just lately in America. In England, for example, judges are still referred to as “your worship” and men in Parliament are called Lords.

Protestants pounce on such statements from Catholics. Aha! they say. I knew it! Catholics worship Mary!

(I’m a former Protestant.)

Peace be to you and to all who post at Catholic Answers.
 
rod of iron:
But Mary did not die so I can be forgiven of my sins. I can’t receive my atonement from the shedding of her blood
.

Who said she did?
Why then should I give her any more respect or vereration than I would to any other human that God has created?
Do you really think any honor you or anyone else could give Mary would exceed the honor God has already bestowed on her?
Jesus saves me, not Mary
Who said anything different?
 
rod of iron:
In what version of the Bible does it say, “Hail full of grace, the Lord is with you”? I have not found it in any version I have looked in. I have found the following in the Luke 1:28 of the Catholic Version of the NRSV, “And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.’” But being favored does not make you without original sin.
The Ignatius Bible Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition has “Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you”
 
rod of iron:
But Mary did not die so I can be forgiven of my sins. I can’t receive my atonement from the shedding of her blood. Why then should I give her any more respect or vereration than I would to any other human that God has created?

Jesus saves me, not Mary.
Lk 1:38 "let it be done to me according to your word’ I believe that these words of Mary were necessary for Jesus to be concieved. We can argue that God didn’t need a human to become Jesus but that is the path he chose to experience our daily lives from birth to death. It is how Jesus is totally human and totally God. We know Jesus to be completely sinless. His human nature would have to be sinless for that to be true. That human nature came from Mary, who also would have had to be sinless, hence “Full of Grace”. If Mary had said “No” to The Angel then there would not have been an Incarnation, at least at that point. Then Simeon told Mary that a sword would pierce her soul also (Lk 2:35) To me this means suffering. For our sins as Jesus did? No, but she suffered our Lords Passion along with Him. She shared in Jesus life and death in a very special way and that is why, in my humble opinion, we should venerate her more than any other created being.
 
How can Roman Catholics explain Luke 11:27-28?
And it came about while He said these things, one of the women in the crowd raised her voice, and said to Him, “Blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breasts at which You nursed.” But He said, “On the contrary, blessed are those who hear the word of God, and observe it.”
Here Jesus specifically changes the topic from Mary to God. No polite ‘thanks’ or thumbs up; instead we are given a contrast between Mary’s election and God’s will. It would seem Mary’s position is completely subordinate. This does not reflect Catholic dogma.

Sola Scriptura,
Rob
 
40.png
Jennifer123:
if you are seeking truth and are willing to hear what is said…
Well, that’s a mighty big “IF” !!! 😉
Some, obviously, are not.
 
40.png
reformedprotest:
How can Roman Catholics explain Luke 11:27-28?

Here Jesus specifically changes the topic from Mary to God. No polite ‘thanks’ or thumbs up; instead we are given a contrast between Mary’s election and God’s will. It would seem Mary’s position is completely subordinate. This does not reflect Catholic dogma.

Sola Scriptura,
Rob
Mary’s position in catholic Dogma is subordinate to God. But she was also honored more highly than any other creature by God in being chosen as the mother of the Son Incarnate. Who else has been honored by God to such an extent?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top