Do Catholics believe John 6:53?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BereanRuss
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe in group A. In group B, Jesus does not have a select group to forgive or withhold sins. God is the only one who can forgive sins. Ralph
Well, what does Jesus do in John chapter 20? Yes, it is God that forgives sins, but Jesus makes it conditional on this select group’s forgiveness. How do you read verses 19-23 of John chapter 20 if you don’t believe in this authority?
 
Brad,

If I am causing you such agony, explain how the priest not not necessay for salvation in the CC.
That would be like saying the Apostles were not necessary for anyone’s Salvation. They are participating in Christ’s work, just as the priest does.
 
Russ, one more thing; did Jesus build a church or write the books of the Holy Bible, before He ascended into the clouds…?
Absolutely, Jesus is still building His church. Now, what is the definition of the “church”?

The church is all persons who have been sealed by the Holy Spirit.

In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.

How then is a Muslim part of the church if they have never trusted in Him?

For “whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved.” How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?
 
Of course good work follow salvation. And they are necessary for our Judgment, according to numerous parables of Jesus.

As a matter of fact, every time Jesus speaks of our Judgment, he makes our good works (our participation in Salvation) part of the reason we receive our particular Judgment. Does that mean someone earns their Salvation? No way!!! It would be like a child telling his mom, “I cleaned my room, mommy, now where’s my million dollars”!

And what happens if a Christian, who is in Christ, ignores these good works and goes about their business doing what ever they feel like? Well… I hope you don’t mind being with the other goats! 😉
The goats are unsaved people, they are going to Hell. The sheep are saved people, (and are going into heaven), their works will be burned up to see if there is any value in any of them If there works stand the test of fire they will receive rewards for them. Ralph
 
Absolutely, Jesus is still building His church. Now, what is the definition of the “church”?

The church is all persons who have been sealed by the Holy Spirit.

In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.

How then is a Muslim part of the church if they have never trusted in Him?

For “whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved.” How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?
The Nature of the Church
PETER KREEFT
catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0091.html

Catholics who remain faithful to Tradition, even if they are reduced to a handful, are the true Church of Jesus Christ.–St. Athanasius (ca. 296-373)
 
Brad,

If I am causing you such agony, explain how the priest not not necessay for salvation in the CC.
Berean,

You are causing me no such agony. It is just frustrating to spend time answering your questions, when you just blatantly disregard the answers and continue with your original misunderstanding/misrepresentation of the Catholic faith. It would be like me saying that you don’t believe that we need to love God and then regardless of what you say I just keep repeating that you don’t believe that we need to love God.

I have stated that the priest is the MEANS for us to celebrate the sacraments (although even a layperson can baptize if a priest is unavailable). God doesn’t depend on the priest, he uses the priest. Do you just not see that difference? Could God have done something different? Sure. He is all powerful, He could have done whatever He willed. He could have not given us the sacraments, but He did.

In a similar way, God could have spread the Gospel in a different way. God didn’t depend on his disciples to go and preach, but He did use them in such a capacity. God didn’t need to give us the Bible either, but He does use it as a means for His word to be available. This is really not even that subtle of a difference.

Do I depend on my car to get to work or could I just as easily take the bus, train, ride my bike, carpool with a neighbor, etc? My car is a means.
 
RUSS:
For “whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved.” How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?
They could be listening to ‘false preachers’ with ‘false preaching’ too. That highlights the importance (not on preaching) but on authority.

Romans 10:14-15

But how are men to call upon him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without a preacher? And how can men preach unless they are sent?

“I had always used these verses to defend the central importance of preaching and why I, therefore, had given up my engineering career for seminary and the great privilege of becoming a preacher of the Gospel! And I was never bothered by the last phrase about the need of being “sent,” because I could point to my ordination where a cackle of local ministers, elders, deacons, and laymen laid their hands on my sweaty head to send me forth in the Name of Jesus. But then, first through my reading of the history and writings of the Early Church Fathers and second through my re-reading of the scriptural context of Paul’s letters, I realized that Paul emphasized the necessity of being “sent” because the occasion of his letters was to combat the negative, heretical influences of self-appointed false teachers. I had never thought of myself as a false teacher, but by what authority did those people send me forth? Who sent them? In this I realized the importance of Apostolic [those who have been sent] succession.”

–Marcus Grodi (host of “The Journey Home” and found of “The Coming Home Network”)
 
Berean,

You are causing me no such agony. It is just frustrating to spend time answering your questions, when you just blatantly disregard the answers and continue with your original misunderstanding/misrepresentation of the Catholic faith. It would be like me saying that you don’t believe that we need to love God and then regardless of what you say I just keep repeating that you don’t believe that we need to love God.

I have stated that the priest is the MEANS for us to celebrate the sacraments (although even a layperson can baptize if a priest is unavailable). God doesn’t depend on the priest, he uses the priest. Do you just not see that difference? Could God have done something different? Sure. He is all powerful, He could have done whatever He willed. He could have not given us the sacraments, but He did.

In a similar way, God could have spread the Gospel in a different way. God didn’t depend on his disciples to go and preach, but He did use them in such a capacity. God didn’t need to give us the Bible either, but He does use it as a means for His word to be available. This is really not even that subtle of a difference.

Do I depend on my car to get to work or could I just as easily take the bus, train, ride my bike, carpool with a neighbor, etc? My car is a means.
We as 'Born Again" christians are God’s feet and mouth to spread the gospel of salvation. ralph
 
Joe,

There is a huge difference here. The work of the Pastor does not add to the finished work of Christ but the work of the CP is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY for SALVATION. Catholics on THIS blog have argued with me that the priest IS necessary. They put it this way:

No priest – No Jesus – No church – No salvation.

When I ask them how it is that the priest comes before Jesus in the above list, they have no real answer

Why is it that on one post Catholics argue that the priest is absolutely necessary and on the next post argue exactly the opposite?
Because God uses the priest to do His work in the Church. God could certainly do it anyway He wants to, but this is the way He chose.
 
The goats are unsaved people, they are going to Hell. The sheep are saved people, (and are going into heaven), their works will be burned up to see if there is any value in any of them If there works stand the test of fire they will receive rewards for them. Ralph
Hmmm… what is the “for” for in the parable. He sets the goats aside and tells them why. He doesn’t say its because they were unsaved. He says because they didn’t do the things that are asked (of all Christians).

I’ll ask you ralph, where does Jesus talk of our own Judgment and not include our works in the balance?
 
We do not need any one to tell us about the “Nature of the church”, we have the word of God to explain it, after all, He is the Author and it is His church. Ralph
Sure, and why do we need 2000 years of Church History to confuse us with the facts. Right, Ralphy? 😉
 
So, God is dependent on you to spread the Gospel?
Although Ralph will certainly have his answer for this, I’d say that God chooses to use the faithful as the means to spread the Gospel. Just as God chooses human men to become priests and to celebrate the Mass for the faithful (and all the other things the priests do… too numerous to mentioned here).
 
Although Ralph will certainly have his answer for this, I’d say that God chooses to use the faithful as the means to spread the Gospel. Just as God chooses human men to become priests and to celebrate the Mass for the faithful (and all the other things the priests do… too numerous to mentioned here).
And I would agree with you. God uses us, he does not depend on us. Why this is even an argument is beyond my comprehension. 🤷
 
**
Verse 10 is a great verse, if you will note in that verse it uses the words “in Christ Jesus”, meaning that you are saved, you cannot be saved outside of Christ Jesus. Good works follow salvation. Ralph
**

Hey Ralph, I agree…

Everything is in Christ Jesus; we have eternal life because of Christ Jesus; we inherit the kingdom prepared for us all since the creation of the world, because of Christ Jesus!!! Without Christ Jesus, we are nothing more than chaff blown away by the wind; Jesus, as per sacred scripture, will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; and he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire, if we don’t obey all of His commandments, not just the ones that appear to be user friendly!!! The question is: do we have to pick up our crosses and follow Christ Jesus if we want eternal life; must we adhere to sacred scripture such as:

"Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ "Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ "The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ "Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ "They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ "He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

OR

Are good works a threat to our eternal salvation???

This seems to be a bit off topic, which I have been guilty of doing myself on occasion; no doubt about that! 🙂
 
"Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; **take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For **I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, …"Then he will say to those on his left, **'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For **I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat,
To read this as “those on the right were believers and those on the left are not” is to totally ignore what Jesus said. When He said, “For I was hungry and you gave me to eat…”, He is explaining WHY they were separated as they were.

It seems that this is a case of reading the Scriptures through the lens of ones belief system. I’m pretty sure that’s not the way Scripture was meant to be read.
 
To read this as “those on the right were believers and those on the left are not” is to totally ignore what Jesus said. When He said, “For I was hungry and you gave me to eat…”, He is explaining WHY they were separated as they were.

It seems that this is a case of reading the Scriptures through the lens of ones belief system. I’m pretty sure that’s not the way Scripture was meant to be read.
Agreed!!! The point is: we are to pick up our crosses and follow Christ Jesus, Who opened up the pearly gates of heaven; I’m on board with you my friend!!! 👍
 
Ralphy, what does this mean to you?

(your quote):
Good works follow salvation
The way you phrase it, and the way certain Protestant traditions view works, is such a false dichtomy. It sounds as if they just doggedly follow the believer around (as if he/she is totally unaware and has NO will to cooperate with God’s works, OR to utterly ignore those ‘set before us’). It’s not as if we’re ‘robotic’ christians that have no minds. They are not just a ‘side dish’…an afterthought. They are incorporated with our faith (faith AND works). There is no separation there. What about all those ‘saved christians’ who actually put forth an effort (if by ‘work’ we should define it was actually struggling/thinking/going-out-of-your-way-to-do stuff). I mean to say, that a ‘saved’ christian can ‘do’ works with intention and knowledge (their own will). Involving our own will doesn’t equate with ‘working’ in a useless and selfish sense. Working out our salvation can simply mean to be cooperating (via the will that God gave to each of us) in cooperation with His Works that he has purposely set before us (provided ways for us to do them).

I’m sure there are many times where ‘saved’ (let’s say Evangelical christians) have ignored, missed, or completely rejected a work that God had desired for them to do. It happens, because of our weaknesses. We can ‘talk ourselves out’ of helping someone (for a variety of reasons), or just refrain from doing something out of laziness (any number of different scenarios and reasons).

I’ve never understood, nor cared for, the Protestant concept of works just sort of ‘happening’, to the Christian who is ‘saved’. It does require some effort to keep ones’ eyes open and see our brother. ** “When did we see you…and not clothe you, feed you, etc…”** Maybe, sometimes, the saved Christian misses those opportunities. Saved christians aren’t God’s mindless puppets. Being in God’s grace (and staying there) requires CONTINUOUS penance, CONTINUOUS thought, observation, prayer…keeeping God on one’s mind all the time. For, the more we pray and have Him on our minds, the more capable we are of ‘seeing’ those opportunities, and in not missing them or rejecting them. Our wills are strong, and it takes living a life that is devoted to God (in developing holiness) that creates a soul that is capable of loving more and in forgiving more, and in doing God’s work more.

I just do NOT like the Protestant theology which is so saturated with the ‘easy’ life. "Once I make a ‘decision for Christ’, everything’s in the bag…and I don’t even have to do anything…because those good works will just land in my lap and …maybe I’ll do them, and maybe I won’t…it doesn’t matter because I’m saved------yet, I damn everyone else, that isn’t saved by the same ‘Evangelical’ decisional manner, and call their works useless (and man-derived). Everyone’s works, in some way, participates with Christ’s redemptive work. It finds a home in us, because we are temples of the Holy Spirit and are all God’s children. Everyone who shows ‘love’ to another, is participating in God’s love–for we are incapable of knowing love or expressing love, without God. He is love. Therefore, in some degree, we all participate in God’s Works, when we show our love of Him, by loving our neighbor (the two greatest commandments).

"Salvation is not only from sin, but for sonship – in Christ. **We are not only forgiven by God’s grace, we are adopted and divinized, that is, we “become partakers of the divine nature” (2 Pet. 1:4). This is ultimately why God created us, to share in the life-giving love of the Trinity. **

Confession is the beginning of glory, not the full desert of the crown; nor does it perfect our praise, but it initiates our dignity; and since it is written, 'He that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved,’ whatever has been before the end is a step by which we ascend to the summit of salvation, not a terminus wherein the full result of the ascent is already gained.” Cyprian, Unity of the Church, 21 (A.D. 251).

"doesn’t sound like, once someone says the Sinner’s Prayer, there’s no more ‘effort’ involved to keep in God’s Grace!!! We must endure (endure: To last: to persist; to suffer firmly or patiently; to bear)

“It is, indeed, to be wondered at, and greatly to be wondered at, that to some of His own children–whom He has regenerated in Christ–to whom He has given faith, hope, and love, God does not give perseverance also.” Augustine, On Rebuke and Grace, 18 (A.D. 427).

Sounds like Augustine is speaking of ‘saved christians’ here (funny, he also speaks of them as needing to persevere–as if they can somehow falter (backslide into sin, as Protestants phrase it). What does that mean to the saved Christian then? To backslide? It sounds like it can jeopardize that relationship to me. Rebuking them, for thinking, perhaps, that everything is ‘in the bag’ at some point or another (when it means that they must endure, in faith and in love, until their last breath).

Big picture. So often Protestants take bits and pieces but MISS the BIG PICTURE. Salvation isn’t summed up in a Sinner’s Prayer, nor completed with one. It is “taking up one’s cross and following Jesus”, until the day we die.
 
The Nature of the Church
PETER KREEFT
catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0091.html

Catholics who remain faithful to Tradition, even if they are reduced to a handful, are the true Church of Jesus Christ.–St. Athanasius (ca. 296-373)
Sorry byzgirl, I have a policy that I do not follow links. You can bring out the major points and post them here in your own words if you like and I will try to respond to them, time permitting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top