Do Catholics still support Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter MamasBoy33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But off the cuff, I’d say that due to the judges heritage Trump assumed he’d have sympathies for illegal immigrants from south of the border. Is it necessarily a fair assumption? No. But I don’t think it’s racist.

We all make assumptions on people based on how we perceive them, that doesn’t make one racist.
I had a great response, but the infamous 502 error ate it. Oh, well.

Is it racist to say that the judge is hispanic, so he must be pro-illegal immigration?
Is it racist to say that that white guy grew up in Georgia so he must be a stupid redneck cracker?
Is it racist to say he’s black so he must be a convicted felon?
 
Trump has been accused of being xenophobic.

Which means fear of foreigners.

Trump is MARRIED to a foreigner.

[Get a dictionary.]
 
Short answer, no. Those things aren’t racist. They’re ignorant, assumptive, and disrespectful, but I don’t think they qualify as racist.
 
Short answer, no. Those things aren’t racist. They’re ignorant, assumptive, and disrespectful, but I don’t think they qualify as racist.
If racism is:
A person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races
and prejudice is “preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.”.

Aren’t those statements showing a preconceived opinion?
 
By strict definition yeah, I can see where you’re coming from. But if we’re going to be that strict with everyone then I’d argue we’re all guilty. I’ve never met a single person who doesn’t hold some preconceived opinions about groups of people.
 
Raise your hand if you think it’s racist.

Do you think that drug dealing is racist?
 
40.png
JanSobieskiIII:
I think that is an accurate definition.

I do not think it applies. He certainly feels that America is better than other countries. He may think that “western culture” is better than other cultures, but I’ve not seen or heard anything from him that makes me think he feels whites are better than non-whites simply by virtue of being white.
How, then, would you characterize the statement against Judge Curiel? Trump basically said that the judge ruled against him simply because the judge was Mexican and TRump is being tough on Mexicans by building a wall.

If we substitute a black judge who ruled against Trump and Trump said it was because Trump was being tough on black crime, would that be racist?
What part of “Mexican is not a race,” did you not understand? Curiel may have been showing unfair allegiance to his countrymen, who come from various racial backgrounds. That preferential stance could have been a possibility given the judge’s comments and loyalties.

Trump merely pointing that out does not make Trump a racist any more that it makes Curiel a racist for showing marked preferential support for his countrymen entering into the US – which he did, by the way.

Since Trump is promoting MAGA and America is a melting pot of virtually hundreds of racial groups, the conclusion could be drawn that he is determinably less racist than those who promote their own single-race or less diverse countries ahead of the USA, or Americans who have a penchant to privilege, say, people from less diverse countries ahead of their own more diverse America.

Frankly, I’ve never understood the “racist” epithet as it is applied by the liberal left. It has become as meaningless as any word could possibly be. The Japanese should be considered the most “racist” nation on earth if the label were applied consistently, but it isn’t. And why shouldn’t a people have a right to favour their own ethnic, cultural and racial heritage, or their own families that come from one such group?

It might be argued that other nations, but not the US, are right to do so; and that being an American, and the US being a “melting pot,” Trump shouldn’t favour the US.

But the US isn’t a country made up of any particular race so being MAGA cannot, by that fact, make Trump a racist.
 
Last edited:
If racism is:
40.png
PaulinVA:
A person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races
and prejudice is “preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.”.

Aren’t those statements showing a preconceived opinion?
What if such statements are based upon reason or actual experience, is the individual who makes them absolved of racism?

And given that you cannot enter into the mind of any other person to determine whether or not there is actual preconception or prejudice on their part, and not reason and actual experience, it would seem that your determination about them being prejudiced is, itself, based upon prejudice and preconception. Mote in your neighbor’s eye log in yours, and all that.
 
Debunk away, my friend. Point me toward some of these myth shattering posts. They sound illuminating.
 
If the parties switched in the 60s, why is FDR still a hero to Democrats?

If the parties switched in the 60s, why did Republicans pass the civil rights act in 64?
 
Yeah. Right. We are ALL guilty.
I think the rule is…

The first one to point out that everyone else is racist cannot – by process of elimination – BE racist.

In other words, if you point with all of your fingertips pointing away from you, that leaves none to point back at you. This nullifies the former rule of pointing with one finger, leaving four pointing back at you.

The game, you must understand, has complicated rules that change continually, but, apparently, that is a feature and not a fault. It is deadly boring for those with short attention spans to play games with rules that don’t continually change. 😁
 
Last edited:
What part of “Mexican is not a race,” did you not understand? Curiel may have been showing unfair allegiance to his countrymen, who come from various racial backgrounds. That preferential stance could have been a possibility given the judge’s comments and loyalties.
Race is not a settled topic for Hispanics: Pew Research Center surveys also find that a majority of Hispanics don’t see themselves fitting into the standard race categories offered by the Census Bureau. In addition, when it comes to describing their identity, more Hispanics prefer to use their family’s country of origin rather than the pan-ethnic terms “Hispanic” or “Latino.”
Trump merely pointing that out does not make Trump a racist any more that it makes Curiel a racist for showing marked preferential support for his countrymen entering into the US – which he did, by the way.
Prove it.
Since Trump is promoting MAGA and America is a melting pot of virtually hundreds of racial groups, the conclusion could be drawn that he is determinably less racist than those who promote their own single-race or less diverse countries ahead of the USA, or Americans who have a penchant to privilege, say, people from less diverse countries ahead of their own more diverse America.
People could equally argue that MAGA is a dog whistle for bringing back that white-majority 1950s Ozzie and Harriet world when life was great for white people. They had manufacturing jobs, could own homes, etc
 
Last edited:
Switched in reference to southern white conservatives/populists. It’s not a perfect 1:1 down the line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top