Do Catholics still support Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter MamasBoy33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
HarryStotle said:
40.png
PaulinVA:
Prove it.
Click to expand...
You mean to YOU?

😂😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...
You said: "
HarryStotle said:
showing marked preferential support for his countrymen entering into the US – which he did, by the way.
Click to expand...
So, you accused a Federal Court Judge of showing preferential treatment to Mexicans. Either prove it or retract it. It’s not funny.
 
Jig_Saw said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
That is what I expect someone suffering from errorphobia would say, rather than admit they are in error.
Click to expand...
Except I’m not in error and perhaps you should do a little homework to realize that.
Click to expand...
Denial is a sure sign of errorphobia.

You have embrace it… …own it, in order to recover from it.

Repeat after me…

I might be in error. I could be mistaken.
 
HarryStotle said:
Denial is a sure sign of errorphobia.

You have embrace it… …own it, in order to recover from it.

Repeat after me…

I might be in error. I could be mistaken.
Click to expand...
It would be a sign of errorphobia, if I did indeed suffer from it. But I don’t.

The problem here is clearly that your seven step treatment of your own errorphobia has caused you to see it everywhere, mostly in places where it doesn’t exist.
 
Spyridon said:
Some things are not worthy of rational argumentative responses.

Are you going to waste your breath trying to convince the madman who thinks airplanes are not mechanical machines but rather sky demons?

Are you going to waste your breath trying to convince the madman who thinks he is made of glass that he’s not going to shatter if he falls?

Are you going to waste your breath trying to convince the madman who believes the earth is flat or the world is only 6,000 years old?
Click to expand...
Or some “madmen” who believe Trump is the spawn of Satan himself?

Yeah, I catch your drift.

But the determination must first be made, without prejudice or preconception, that they are verifiably mad.

Some are just sourpusses.
 
PaulinVA said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
40.png
PaulinVA:
Prove it.
Click to expand...
You mean to YOU?

😂😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...
You said: "
HarryStotle said:
showing marked preferential support for his countrymen entering into the US – which he did, by the way.
Click to expand...
So, you accused a Federal Court Judge of showing preferential treatment to Mexicans. Either prove it or retract it. It’s not funny.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a fool’s errand.

Not the fact finding, but the “proving.”

Waste of breath and I suffer from emphysema.
 
Jig_Saw said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
Denial is a sure sign of errorphobia.

You have embrace it… …own it, in order to recover from it.

Repeat after me…

I might be in error. I could be mistaken.
Click to expand...
It would be a sign of errorphobia, if I did indeed suffer from it. But I don’t.

The problem here is clearly that your seven step treatment of your own errorphobia has caused you to see it everywhere, mostly in places where it doesn’t exist.
Click to expand...
I freely admit I could be, and likely am, in error about everything, including everything I tentatively think about Trump. Things could go radically bad or radically good. I am open to the fact that BOTH eventualities are possible. Life is like that.

You on the other hand have a preconceived notion that things could not possibly turn out well at all and are not at all open to the possibility that you just might be wrong on the matter.

Am I right? 😏
 
PaulinVA said:
So, you were just making stuff up for the sake of a discussion on the internet?

Got it.
Click to expand...
Of course, doesn’t everybody? Wasn’t that the point of this thread?

Kind of like who can tell the biggest lie about Trump and make it sound plausible?

Tall Tales About Trump

I gotta admit, your side was winning by a long shot.
 
Last edited:
Jig_Saw said:
It would be a sign of errorphobia, if I did indeed suffer from it. But I don’t.

The problem here is clearly that your seven step treatment of your own errorphobia has caused you to see it everywhere, mostly in places where it doesn’t exist.
Click to expand...
Yeah, no. It’s a six step treatment. You made a little error there, but I wouldn’t expect you to admit that so early in the program.
 
HarryStotle said:
You on the other hand have a preconceived notion that things could not possibly turn out well at all and are not at all open to the possibility that you just might be wrong on the matter.

Am I right? 😏
Click to expand...
I am open to the possibility that things may turn out very different than I believe, but I am basing what I think will happen in the future based on what’s happened in the past. As one has often heard, those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.
 
HarryStotle said:
Of course, doesn’t everybody? Wasn’t that the point of this thread?

Kind of like who can tell the biggest lie about Trump and make it sound plausible?

Tall Tales About Trump

I gotta admit, your side was winning by a long shot.
Click to expand...
Sigh.

Never mind. I have never knowingly lied on this tread. I know people might challenge me so I make sure I can prove things before I post them.

If I post an opinion, I have information to support my position.
 
Lol this book. This will consume trump till the day he dies. I’m sure he’s having a complete meltdown knowing that his staff uniformly think he’s an idiotic toddler.
 
Thanks for the chuckle. Have you heard of the “Free Melania” movement?
 
Judge Curiel needed police protection due to his prosecution of Mexican drug lords.

I
 
The best book, IMHO, on how to buy stocks … how to manage your portfolio … is “How To Make A Million In The Stock Market Automatically” by Robert LIchello:

Loading…

www.amazon.com
 
Republican House Rep’s approach to Obama vs Trump

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Hi Rep. Brady,

We see you 😏
 
You’re not alone. About half or more of Catholics vote Democrat in any given election.
 
The public would be surprised by some of the more ‘interesting’ views of some scientists including those who have articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The views they hold on other scientific disciplines don’t invalidate what is published. That’s the point. An error in one discipline held by a person doesn’t invalidate his or her theory in another. Otherwise, we would have to discard many theories in physics and chemistry due to ad hominem approaches.
But those of us with an actual background in the natural sciences apparently need to be lectured by some who don’t have such a background on how science actually works. At that point, you know there isn’t much hope for rationality and engaging in a dialogue with such people is pointless.

Relating to this thread, instead of criticising the political choices of people, we’re seeing personal attacks on people on this thread. Exactly how does that lead to civility?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top