One further thought on Patchunky’s comment: MANY Ruthenian parishes are still latinized heavily.
10-20 years ago, we had no candlestands at St. Nicholas. Even 10 years ago. We did have the table under the lamp, with the icon of the day. The tradition of reverencing the icon thereupon was being restarted back in the early 90’s.
As the parish has delatinized (and it was one of the least such in the Ruthenian church, by many measures, since its assigned goal was to convert the Russian Orthodox), many orthodox traditions have returned. Of course, while His Grace Nicholas +Elko was ordering the removal of Iconostasi, St. Nicholas put one in… one that bypassed his objection to iconostasi: you could easily see through it! It was gold-painted square-stock open ironwork. That 1960’s Iconostas was pulled about 1996.
The Candlestands, which, for reference, are IDENTICAL to the ones in the local Russian Orthodox parishes. And they get used in both St. Nicholas’ and the local RO parishes. They game back shortly after the turn of the 21st century…
The ACROD are undergoing a “Re-greeking” not dissimilar to the one Metropolitan Basil, and his synod with him, are imposing upon the Ruthenian Church in America.
Patchunky’s experience is not invalid, just not universal within the Ruthenian Church. Not all OCA parishes are as traditional as the 100+ year old still-labelled-in-cyrillic Russian Orthodox parishes in Alaska, either.
My own praxis is on par with many of the RO in Alaska. Enough so that more than one priest has invited me for confession and communion, being basically ignorant of or accepting of the EC’s as “Orthodox in Communion with Rome.”
I see no problem with personal devotions borrowed across rites… or even from the Eastern or Oriental Orthodox, even from the Jacobites and Nestorians… but I do see the need to have and know one’s own traditions and rules, and to not impose these externals upon one’s church. If, however, they become normative by popular use and are not contraindicated by the theology of the Church, I see no reason they can not be authentic additions to a given Sui Iuris church’s praxis.