MegaTherion wrote:
When I say “real,” though, I mean “manifesting in the objective world that we all share in a way that is verifiable through independent confirmation.”
Well, that’s Empiricism. That’s a philosophical belief. That is your definition of reality.
How do you know it is isn’t wrong?
Something that is “real,” in this sense, is real for everybody and can be confirmed.
Things in your imagination might be “real” to you, but not real in this sense.
But mankind knowledge is limited; we don’t know everything about the universe,
We haven’t visited all the planets in the universe; there were something like 20 species of new animals discovered in the last year.
It was reported recently that the Milky Way galaxy in actuality looks very different from how astronomers envisioned it.
Your profile states you’re an Atheist.
Do you know with 100% absolute certitude that God does not exist?
Or, is that a personal belief of your own?
Myths might be “real” in an abstract sense (i.e. the myth of Prometheus may teach a lesson about the human will that is actual) but not in the sense that I am speaking (i.e. there is not literally a Prometheus):
I don’t know the story, but it could have been based on an actual person or someone similar to him, or perhaps it was an archetype literary creation.
I don’t know; I think all we can do is speculate; neither you or I was there.
I will agree that Empiricism can work as a philosophical system of organizing society in a certain type of way; it denies the existence of religion.
It is a way of looking at the world and understanding it; however, that doesn’t necessarily make it the “correct” or the best way or the only way of looking at things, or lead to a good human society .
Religion and belief in a God is faith based; you want belief in God to be “verifiable through independent confirmation”.
Well, I can’t do that, except through the dogmas of my religion; but that still does not necessarily mean that the dogmas of Catholicism are not true.
They could in fact be true, and I believe and trust them to be true; they may not be “verifiable through independent confirmation”; but I put my faith and trust in God that they are true.
And those beliefs could be “real”, as you define it, but we human beings lack the ability to verify them through independent confirmation.
And just because something is not “verifiable through independent confirmation”, does not necessarily mean it does not exist in the universe.
But Empiricism can be used as a philosophical standard in organizing our society and civilization.
But Empiricism isn’t the only organizing standard or necessarily the best one.
Have you read Braithwaite
Who is Braithwaite??