do mormons have the holy spirit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpk1313
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a Latter Day Saint (or Mormon as the world tends to know us as), I certainly receive personal revelation through the Holy Ghost, regularly.

Everything I read otherwise from other posters is false regarding what I believe and other members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
 
As a Latter Day Saint (or Mormon as the world tends to know us as), I certainly receive personal revelation through the Holy Ghost, regularly.

Everything I read otherwise from other posters is false regarding what I believe and other members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
Could you please share the Mormon message to us in regards to the great apostasy, and the restoration of true Christianity through the Angel Moroni and the Prophet Joseph Smith? We know that as a Mormon, your personal revelation from the Holy Ghost is in harmony with the modern day Prophets of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. What has God revealed to mankind through your modern day prophets, starting with Joseph Smith?

This request is made to all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Thanks for the help!

lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=e419fb40e21cef00VgnVCM1000001f5e340aRCRD
 
Mormons do not have the Holy Spirit in them as if they were converted to Christ. If a particular Mormon is converted, the Holy Spirit would cause that particular Mormon to be unsettled in the Mormon services due to what is taught. Eventually, a converted Mormon led by Holy Spirit would leave the Mormon Church. Protestants do not believe Mormons are part of the body of Christ. They preach a different Jesus and different gospel which is no gospel at all (Gal 10. The Catholic Faith is probably in agreement since Mormon baptism are not recogonized by the Catholic Magestrium. Please ask why Mormom baptism are not valid. You have to speak the truth in love with your Mormon friends, so they would repent and turn to our Triune God through the Jesus revealed in the Scriptures. The Mormon claim of apostate Christianity in need or restoration by Joseph Smith is a message from the Devil.

Corinthians 11:4

For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or if you accept a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it readily enough.
Can you tell us first what denomination you belong to, or what Christian tradition you adhere to? The contents of your posts suggest some version of Protestantism; and although the links in your signature point to Catholic sources, they are carefully chosen to appear to justify Protestant doctrines. When I discuss religion with someone, I like to know what religion they are in. That helps me to communicate with them better. It is not a good idea to pretend to a different religion from what you really believe in. That is called hypocrisy. Jesus often condemned that. I am a Mormon. I am not ashamed to admit that. And when I discuss religion with others I like them to be equally frank and upfront about what they really believe in.
 
Can you tell us first what denomination you belong to, or what Christian tradition you adhere to? The contents of your posts suggest some version of Protestantism; and although the links in your signature point to Catholic sources, they are carefully chosen to appear to justify Protestant doctrines. When I discuss religion with someone, I like to know what religion they are in. That helps me to communicate with them better. It is not a good idea to pretend to a different religion from what you really believe in. That is called hypocrisy. Jesus often condemned that. I am a Mormon. I am not ashamed to admit that. And when I discuss religion with others I like them to be equally frank and upfront about what they really believe in.
Thanks for your response. Here is a summary of what I believe:

monergism.com/
 
Thanks for your response. Here is a summary of what I believe:

monergism.com/
Thank you. I must adimit I was not familiar with that particular religious tradition; but judging by what I saw it appears to be pretty much the same as Reformed theology, repackaged in different words. Wikipedia is always a good place to get a concise view of things (emphasis added):

Monergism describes the position in Christian theology of those who believe that God through the Holy Spirit works to effectually bring about the salvation of individuals through spiritual regeneration without cooperation from the individual. Monergism is most often associated with Calvinism (e.g., Presbyterians and Dutch Reformed) and its doctrine of irresistible grace and in particular with historic doctrinal differences between Calvinism on the one hand and Arminianism on the other.

This position is often presented in contrast to synergism, the belief that God and individuals cooperate for salvation. Lutherans generally adhere to a modified and less stringent form of monergism.

In its simplest form, monergism states that the regeneration of an individual is the work of God the Holy Spirit alone, as opposed to synergism, which, in its simplest form, argues that the human will cooperates with God’s grace in order to be regenerated. To the synergist, faith may arise from unregenerated human nature. Salvation is not complete until the individual performs some action(s). According to monergism, faith in Christ only springs from a heart first renewed by God. Source

I can definitely say that Mormons have a lot more in common with Catholics than with your version of Christianity. Mormonism and Catholicism are both very much “synergistic” and not “monernistic”. So it would appear you have come to the wrong place to argue against Mormonism, because all your arguments against Mormonism are equally applicable against Catholicism. It looks like I don’t need to defend Mormonism here because Catholics can do just as good a job! Any arguments they bring will be good enough for me! 😃
 
Thank you. I must adimit I was not familiar with that particular religious tradition; but judging by what I saw it appears to be pretty much the same as Reformed theology, repackaged in different words. Wikipedia is always a good place to get a concise view of things (emphasis added):

Monergism describes the position in Christian theology of those who believe that God through the Holy Spirit works to effectually bring about the salvation of individuals through spiritual regeneration without cooperation from the individual. Monergism is most often associated with Calvinism (e.g., Presbyterians and Dutch Reformed) and its doctrine of irresistible grace and in particular with historic doctrinal differences between Calvinism on the one hand and Arminianism on the other.

This position is often presented in contrast to synergism, the belief that God and individuals cooperate for salvation. Lutherans generally adhere to a modified and less stringent form of monergism.

In its simplest form, monergism states that the regeneration of an individual is the work of God the Holy Spirit alone, as opposed to synergism, which, in its simplest form, argues that the human will cooperates with God’s grace in order to be regenerated. To the synergist, faith may arise from unregenerated human nature. Salvation is not complete until the individual performs some action(s). According to monergism, faith in Christ only springs from a heart first renewed by God. Source

I can definitely say that Mormons have a lot more in common with Catholics than with your version of Christianity. Mormonism and Catholicism are both very much “synergistic” and not “monernistic”. So it would appear you have come to the wrong place to argue against Mormonism, because all your arguments against Mormonism are equally applicable against Catholicism. It looks like I don’t need to defend Mormonism here because Catholics can do just as good a job! Any arguments they bring will be good enough for me! 😃
I think you have discerned things incorrectly. Protestants are called seperated brothers and sisters by the Catholic Church. Mormons do not have that recognition by the Catholic Church. Monergism does not divide the body of Christ. There are plenty of synergistic Arminian Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ. Catholics and Protestants know the same One True Triune God through the living Jesus Christ revealed in the Scriptures. Check out this thread link from my Catholic brothers and sisters in Christ. - A Reformed Christian.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=385198

😉 I have no issues if ex-Mormons moved to a Catholic or Orthodox Church to worship the One True Triune god. However, ex-Mormons would get better theology at a Reformed Church. Please share the Mormon gospel of apostate Christianity and the restoration of the church through the LDS Prophets.
 
I think you have discerned things incorrectly. Protestants are called seperated brothers and sisters by the Catholic Church.
But you consider the Catholic Church to be evil and abominable and “whore of Babylon” and a source of damnation to those who adhere to it. That is your traditional historical theological position.
Mormons do not have that recognition by the Catholic Church.
I am not really sure about that. I don’t think that there is an official Catholic position regarding who is “separated brethren” and who is not. As far as I have been able to learn from the Catholics here, the official teaching is that honorable and virtuous people even among even non-Christians will be saved through the grace of God; and that presumably include Mormons.
Monergism does not divide the body of Christ.
I haven’t a clue what that means.
There are plenty of synergistic Arminian Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ. Catholics and Protestants know the same One True Triune God through the living Jesus Christ revealed in the Scriptures. Check out this thread link from my Catholic brothers and sisters in Christ. - A Reformed Christian.
I don’t think that your attempt to cozy up to Catholicism in order to gang up against Mormonism will work. Catholics are smart enough to know that you are as much against Catholicism as you are against Mormonism—your protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
😉 I have no issues if ex-Mormons moved to a Catholic or Orthodox Church to worship the One True Triune god. However, ex-Mormons would get better theology at a Reformed Church.
I take that as being tongue in cheek. The opposition of your religious tradition to Catholicism is well known.
Please share the Mormon gospel of apostate Christianity and the restoration of the church through the LDS Prophets.
We believe that early Christianity went into apostasy, meaning that it lost the priesthood authority that it once possessed, leading to gradual errors in doctrine as well as church organization and administration so that the church was no longer the same as what the Lord had originally established. That is not a new idea. Protestants believed that before Mormons did. The main distinction between the Protestant and Mormon doctrines of the Apostasy is that in Protestantism it takes on the character of deep hatred of Catholicism; whereas in Mormonism is does not. On the contrary, Mormonism in its theology and practices is a lot closer to Catholicism than it is to Protestantism.

By the Restoration of the Church we mean the reestablishment of the original Church of Christ with the full authority of the priesthood that it once possessed, that had been lost through the Apostasy. That is the simple meaning of the Restoration.
 
But you consider the Catholic Church to be evil and abominable and “whore of Babylon” and a source of damnation to those who adhere to it. That is your traditional historical theological position.
I never posted that, nor do I believe that. I hope you posted that as an accident in comparison to intentional slander. Most grounded Protestants know that true body of Christ is a mix of regenerate believers from Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, and Anglican communities… because we all worship the One True Triune God. Jesus Christ is God incarnate. I hate to say it, but sometimes Mormons are the worst to discuss and debate with.
 
I never posted that, nor do I believe that. I hope you posted that as an accident in compared to slander.
I am glad you don’t; but that is the standard historical theological position of Protestantism, especially of “Reformed” theology which you adhere to. If you don’t believe in that, then you should reconsider your adherence to the so called “Reformed” version of Christianity.
 
I am glad you don’t; but that is the standard historical theological position of Protestantism, especially of “Reformed” theology which you adhere to. If you don’t believe in that, then you should reconsider your adherence to the so called “Reformed” version of Christianity.
Your post is misleading again. Are you familar with ECT 1 and ECT 2 documents which staunch Reformed theologian JI Packer signed? You might be familar with Packer’s book called “Knowing God”. In addition, I believe Chuck Colson is Reformed too since he credits the minstry of RC Sproul (staunch Calvinist) for his conversion. Chuck Colson from the Nixon adminstration is one of the most smartest men, led the way on the Protestant side of ECT.

ECT = Evangelicals and Catholics Together !

seekgod.ca/ect.htm

ECT 1

seekgod.ca/ect3.htm

ECT 2

seekgod.ca/ect2.htm

I believe Catholics and Protestants together want to share the biblical Jesus Christ with you on this site. Are you willing to discuss our mutually exclusive gospels?
 
Your post is misleading again. Are you familar with ECT 1 and ECT 2 documents which staunch Reformed theologian JI Packer signed? You might be familar with Packer’s book called “Knowing God”. In addition, I believe Chuck Colson is Reformed too since he credits the minstry of RC Sproul (staunch Calvinist) for his conversion. Chuck Colson from the Nixon adminstration is one of the most smartest men, led the way on the Protestant side on ECT.

ECT = Evangelicals and Catholics Together !

seekgod.ca/ect.htm

ECT 1

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=5814593#post5814593

ECT 2

seekgod.ca/ect2.htm
That is a new development. It is a departure from the traditional Calvinist/Reformed/Evangelical/Baptist way of thinking. If they are now “reforming” themselves in this way, that is good thing. I am all for it. But it will take a while before I am convinced that it is an all-inclusive development within the entire body of the Reformed/Evangelical movement.
 
That is a new development. It is a departure from the traditional Calvinist/Reformed/Evangelical/Baptist thinking. If they are now “reforming” themselves in this way, that is good thing. I am all for it. But it will take a while before I am convinced that it is an all-inclusive development within the entire body of the Reformed/Evangelical movement.
Why are you focusing so much on Reformed Theology? This thread is about the Mormon gospel. Please share it with us!
 
The burning of the bosom testimony is not from God the Holy Spirit.
Well, it was good enough for the apostles, that ‘burning in the bosom’ thing. Luke 24:32
I bet my eternal destiny on that statement.
Well, you are, actually.
I have had many friends who are Mormon. Some have come out of the Mormon Religion, testifying that the LDS church is false, and are now Christians by the grace of God.
…and most, I imagine, have not.
If you go by feeling my friends, that is not much to base your faith and eternal destiny on.
I repeat: it was sufficient for the apostles…

But you realize that there’s more to it than that, right? Or at least the MORMONS say so. I can’t speak for what you claim we believe.
I am speaking this way so you would repent of the god of Mormonism and trun to the God revealed in the Scriptures. The Mormon god is not the same God as the God of Protestants and Catholics.
Actually, He is. what we believe ABOUT Him may be different–but perhaps not as different as you would like to claim. However, there is only one God, no matter what people believe about Him.
 
Well, it was good enough for the apostles, that ‘burning in the bosom’ thing. Luke 24:32
LOL…

Luke 24:32

They said to each other, “Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the Scriptures?”

There is an eternal difference of a Mormon buring of the bosom apart from Scripture revelation, and Luke 24 of our hearts burned with God opening the Scriptures to spirituality understand. Why do you think Jesus spoke in parables according to Jesus? The Christian burning of the bosom always goes with Scirpture illuminiation through God the Holy Spirit. 🙂

Burning of the bosom without Scripture = Mormonism

Burning of the bosom with the Holy Spirit illuminating the Holy Scriptures = Christianity
 
Here is a summary of what I believe:

monergism.com/
🤷 tell me, is this really ‘what you believe’ … or what God told you to believe ?
Did you have any choice in the matter ? Is Apostasy part of your lexicon ? Did the thief on cross’ confession of faith … spring from monergism dogma ?

To build your theology around 6-8 verses, ignoring many others that teach synergism, is not using faith & reason.
 
2nd Adam,
One assumes that someone such as yourself is aware of how to access all of the comments of a particular participant on these threads. I respect Zerinus’ knowledge of Mormon doctrine and how much time he has spent posting information about Mormon beliefs. You can access all of that with a few keystrokes.

You seem to enjoy the writings of the apostle Paul. When he wrote his epistles to the Corinthians, he emphasized as you noted in one of the passages you cited that the things of the Spirit can only be spiritually discerned. Yet here you are defending the attempts by the Nicene Creed to define the Trinity through the intellectual, philosophical discussions that preceded the definition they came up with. That was exactly what Paul was warning against. That was “another Jesus”–a philosophical arrival at a definition. That was the work of the “wisdom of men”, clear as a bell.

When Paul warned against “false apostles,” he was warning the Corinthians against self-proclaimed “wise men” who were seeking self-aggrandizement within their own city and in their own time. He emphasized that true followers of Christ would not seek to be praised in any way. He emphasized that a follower of Christ could be discerned by what was in their heart, not by outward show.

The epistles are good reading, but the opportunity to learn through the guidance of the Holy Spirit can only come through humility, sincerity, and a love for all humankind as children of God. One who does not follow the Sermon on the Mount in how they treat and interact with people, could not possibly hope to have the Holy Spirit guiding their life or their studies of the gospel. One must live by the basics first and foremost.
 
2nd Adam,
One assumes that someone such as yourself is aware of how to access all of the comments of a particular participant on these threads. I respect Zerinus’ knowledge of Mormon doctrine and how much time he has spent posting information about Mormon beliefs. You can access all of that with a few keystrokes.

You seem to enjoy the writings of the apostle Paul. When he wrote his epistles to the Corinthians, he emphasized as you noted in one of the passages you cited that the things of the Spirit can only be spiritually discerned. Yet here you are defending the attempts by the Nicene Creed to define the Trinity through the intellectual, philosophical discussions that preceded the definition they came up with. That was exactly what Paul was warning against. That was “another Jesus”–a philosophical arrival at a definition. That was the work of the “wisdom of men”, clear as a bell.

When Paul warned against “false apostles,” he was warning the Corinthians against self-proclaimed “wise men” who were seeking self-aggrandizement within their own city and in their own time. He emphasized that true followers of Christ would not seek to be praised in any way. He emphasized that a follower of Christ could be discerned by what was in their heart, not by outward show.

The epistles are good reading, but the opportunity to learn through the guidance of the Holy Spirit can only come through humility, sincerity, and a love for all humankind as children of God. One who does not follow the Sermon on the Mount in how they treat and interact with people, could not possibly hope to have the Holy Spirit guiding their life or their studies of the gospel. One must live by the basics first and foremost.
I’m checking out for the night. Can you simply post your understanding of the gospel?
 
Why are you focusing so much on Reformed Theology?
When you debate, attack, or argue against another religion, the theological basis on which you base that attack becomes the subject of investigation, and part of the defense strategy. The theological basis on which you attack Mormonism is obviously Calvinist/Reformed theology; and if that theological basis is highly erroneous, then that becomes an essential part of the defense strategy against your attack. The truth is that Reformed theology, or “Monergism” as you like to call it, is false. It is an abominable doctrine that has no basis in biblical teachings. And evidently Catholics agree with that too.
This thread is about the Mormon gospel. Please share it with us!
Mormon gospel is simple: it is a Restoration of the original and true Church of Jesus Christ, with the fullness of the priesthood restored. That is the essence of it. What else do you want me to tell you?
 
I’m checking out for the night. Can you simply post your understanding of the gospel?
The Book of Mormon has answered that question:

3 Nephi 27:

13 Behold I have given unto you my gospel, and this is the gospel which I have given unto you—that I came into the world to do the will of my Father, because my Father sent me.
14 And my Father sent me that I might be lifted up upon the cross; and after that I had been lifted up upon the cross, that I might draw all men unto me, that as I have been lifted up by men even so should men be lifted up by the Father, to stand before me, to be judged of their works, whether they be good or whether they be evil—
15 And for this cause have I been lifted up; therefore, according to the power of the Father I will draw all men unto me, that they may be judged according to their works.
16 And it shall come to pass, that whoso repenteth and is baptized in my name shall be filled; and if he endureth to the end, behold, him will I hold guiltless before my Father at that day when I shall stand to judge the world.
17 And he that endureth not unto the end, the same is he that is also hewn down and cast into the fire, from whence they can no more return, because of the justice of the Father.
18 And this is the word which he hath given unto the children of men. And for this cause he fulfilleth the words which he hath given, and he lieth not, but fulfilleth all his words.
19 And no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their faithfulness unto the end.
20 Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day.
21 Verily, verily, I say unto you, this is my gospel; and ye know the things that ye must do in my church; for the works which ye have seen me do that shall ye also do; for that which ye have seen me do even that shall ye do;
22 Therefore, if ye do these things blessed are ye, for ye shall be lifted up at the last day.

The answer is found in these verses from the Doctrine and Covenants too:

D&C 33:

11 Yea, repent and be baptized, every one of you, for a remission of your sins; yea, be baptized even by water, and then cometh the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost.
12 Behold, verily, verily, I say unto you, this is my gospel; and remember that they shall have faith in me or they can in nowise be saved;
13 And upon this rock I will build my church; yea, upon this rock ye are built, and if ye continue, the gates of hell shall not prevail against you.
14 And ye shall remember the church articles and covenants to keep them.

D&C 39:

5 And verily, verily, I say unto you, he that receiveth my gospel receiveth me; and he that receiveth not my gospel receiveth not me.
6 And this is my gospel—repentance and baptism by water, and then cometh the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost, even the Comforter, which showeth all things, and teacheth the peaceable things of the kingdom.
 
LOL…

Luke 24:32

They said to each other, “Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the Scriptures?”

There is an eternal difference of a Mormon buring of the bosom apart from Scripture revelation, and Luke 24 of our hearts burned with God opening the Scriptures to spirituality understand. Why do you think Jesus spoke in parables according to Jesus? The Christian burning of the bosom always goes with Scirpture illuminiation through God the Holy Spirit. 🙂

Burning of the bosom without Scripture = Mormonism

Burning of the bosom with the Holy Spirit illuminating the Holy Scriptures = Christianity
Now where on earth did you get the notion that 'burning of the bosom" was WITHOUT THE SCRIPTURE, in Mormonism?

I take it that you’ve never read Moroni 10:3-7,

…and where on earth did you get the idea that finding truth MUST come only through scripture? James 1:5-6 say that one must ask in faith, but doesn’t say anything about reading for the answer.

The Holy Ghost will confirm Truth as He will, not as you dictate that He must.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top