Do You Know How Bad the Dechristianization of Europe Really Is?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamalChristophr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Definitely going down the way of ‘anything goes’ Anglicanism isn’t the way forward. Whereas I believe a return to traditionalism is.
 
Whereas I believe a return to traditionalism is.
Definitely. The problem is that the Bishops first need to admit that they screwed up by changing a successful formula. They copied the Anglicans but Catholics didn’t want to change. That’s why they left in the 70s. Stats don’t lie. Everybody was happy with the Latin, the devotions and the beautiful churches. The church flourished because we kept it real. If there’s any priests or bishops reading this then listen up: give the Catholics what they need, which is strong catehesis and decent worship.
 
Last edited:
Again though, the people might say they are Christian, but they are not practicing their faith. Something like 7% of Russians go to church regularly.

 
Speaking as a german citizen:

Yes, secular culture is growing. Being religious is seen as unprofessional or old fashioned, If not silly in many, but not all environments.
It’s similar here in the UK. And when you do get the likes of politicians who are open about their Christian faith they can end up being forced out of their positions (such as ex-Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron) or branded as an extremist (such as Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg).

As a Christian in the UK, I think you are generally regarded as a bit nutty. I think you are tolerated as long as you are seen as a ‘liberal’ Christian who accepts the secular line on gay marriage, contraception, abortion and the likes.

But I think we should not get disheartened by this. Benedict XVI wrote about the Church getting smaller in the future. It is not about numbers. Keep in mind John 15:18, “If the world hate you, know ye that it hath hated me before you.”
 
Last edited:
Catholics, remember that the Church is the Mystical Body of Christ.
From the beginning, we have struggled to live in Him, we have struggled to live and proclaim the Gospel.
Don’t be knocked off-mission by struggle.
The Church - perfected in glory

769 "The Church . . . will receive its perfection only in the glory of heaven,"179 at the time of Christ’s glorious return. Until that day, "the Church progresses on her pilgrimage amidst this world’s persecutions and God’s consolations."180 Here below she knows that she is in exile far from the Lord, and longs for the full coming of the Kingdom, when she will "be united in glory with her king."181 The Church, and through her the world, will not be perfected in glory without great trials. Only then will "all the just from the time of Adam, ‘from Abel, the just one, to the last of the elect,’ . . . be gathered together in the universal Church in the Father’s presence."182

III. THE MYSTERY OF THE CHURCH

770 The Church is in history, but at the same time she transcends it. It is only "with the eyes of faith"183 that one can see her in her visible reality and at the same time in her spiritual reality as bearer of divine life.
Do not be afraid, do not be downcast.
(these are the exhortations of JP2, who live among two of the most ungodly cultures to ever exist. and still lived a life of hope, faith, and charity. )
 
Last edited:
As a Christian in the UK, I think you are generally regarded as a bit nutty. I think you are tolerated as long as you are seen as a ‘liberal’ Christian who accepts the secular line on gay marriage, contraception, abortion and the likes.
This is definitely true. I’ve been called eccentric because I attend Mass. Christians are regarded as suspect. They only tolerate us because of political correctness but scratch the surface and the anti-Catholic bias comes tumbling out.
 
I think you’re accepted by our secular society so long as you are a ‘modern’ Christian who buys into the secular agenda. I don’t think they mind you believing in God, just so long as this doesn’t conflict with secular values. Personally, I think this may get worse before it will get better.

Although I do wonder what the effect would be if someone like Jacob Rees-Mogg ended up as the British Prime Minister. A solid Catholic who is not afraid to speak up, attends Latin Mass and is a family man. I wonder?
 
Last edited:
What annoying people and thriving on naive? Nah that’s not cool.
 
Maybe that’s why John XXIII felt called to initiate an ecumenical council. Maybe Vatican II actually prevented something worse from happening.
That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.
 
That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.
Look at the wider society. They’re totally lost. I mean things are crazy! The Catholic community are part of this wider society. Loads of Catholics left the Church and embraced the world. Maybe it would’ve been worse without Vatican II and John Paul II. I’ve blamed Vatican II for EVERYTHING that happened in the last 50 years. But now I think it might have been worse without Vatican II. Don’t forget that the paedophile priest crisis began before the Council and the liturgy began changing before the Council. So maybe the Council put the brakes on by trying to combat things. Just a thought.
 
Quantity over quality.
That’s not what Jesus wants.
What He actually wants is real discipleship. Disciples who are truly repentant and truly seek the Kingdom of God and His righteousness. Who seek to live holy lives. Who seek to serve Him.
In a decade or so, any church/parish/congregation that looks ‘good’ at this moment but never properly nourished the flock will face a crisis because no spiritual transformation occurred and it will wither.
 
Last edited:
Go to Europe and chat with any random person you meet from any country. It is rare to find a person who is devout in the Catholic faith or any faith. Take a tour of the Vatican or San Marco Square and your tour guide will lead you through all the Catholic art and architecture with thinly veiled contempt for the church. The statistics do not surprise me.
 
Legion of Mary Peregrinatio Pro Christo. Google it? We already have that in the Catholic Church. We just don’t do it.
 
Quite a few Anglican Priests became Catholic Priests and now some parishes have married priests. The Anglican priests have the Ordinariate .
 
Quite a few Anglican Priests became Catholic Priests and now some parishes have married priests. The Anglican priests have the Ordinariate .
Yup. And that number is increasing steadily. We have more and more married priests in the Church every year.
 
Last edited:
I am French. I have seen a quick collapse of the Church since I was child, and I am only 30.
Church which are empty and merge
numbers of catechized children which fall. And uninteresting cathechism
Practicing Catholics who goes secular (premarital cohabitation, etc etc…)
more than 50 % of births out of wedlock.
religion completely banned from normal life and Christians values as a taboo, mostly in sex and life issues…

I need a time to realized that…

And contrary to what some of you said in this post, the relatovely hight birthrate in France (1,9 children per women) in comparaison of the rest of europe, are not the fact a Traditional Catholics families who are very very few, anocdectical, but thanks to the births politics which help families (maternity leave, help to paid daycare…), and immigration. But the rate slow down because of recent negative changes in politic for families and the fall of the number of women in childbearing years…

And Italy is still a Catholic contry, but a dying one. So in the next year Catholicism will plumge to.
 
Most of Western Europe (excepting Southern Europe) split ways with Christianity as a central cultural institution after the Renaissance. Or I think at least by the 18th century the influence of the Church was weakening. Maybe I exaggerate but not by much. The Enlightenment was about man, not God. Voltaire, all that. Diderot. 1776, US. This is old news. 😐 They killed God, in a nutshell.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing your experience, Anicette. It’s good to have people from Europe. We need a more balanced perspective on things, etc.
 
To rebound off this post, it’s pretty clear that traditional Catholics or Catholicism in general isn’t driving up the national birthrate to 1.9, since the birthrate among non-religious Frenchmen is 1.9. Same for nominal Catholics; their birthrate is already at 2.0; we don’t need to add the birthrates of other groups, traditional Catholics or otherwise, to reach that number.

What interests us is not the French birthrate in itself, which as you correctly point out is being artificially propped up by generous social benefits, but the fact that there is a burgeoning segment of the French Catholic population that is having children, and many of them—keeping pace with, and often even exceeding, the Muslim birthrate. While 120,000 is indeed a small number relatively speaking, it is not insignificant, especially if the majority of these Catholics found families and have four or five children on average. Without these small but committed communities and families, we would have good reason to be pessimistic about France’s future, but at the moment there’s still a glimmer of hope. As for the rest of Europe, my knowledge is too sketchy to say anything definite, so hopefully other posters will continue to contribute and shed light on the situation in their own countries.
[/quote]

Your factual information and observations are useful. Your reluctance to comment on areas where your knowledge is “too sketchy” is unfamiliar to most of us, especially American Catholics online. We gladly comment, pontificate in fact, on areas we have no knowledge whatsoever; which for most of us, that means every place outside the USA.
 
40.png
Saxum:
Maybe that’s why John XXIII felt called to initiate an ecumenical council. Maybe Vatican II actually prevented something worse from happening.
That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.
We have to avoid two temptations here: to credit the Council with everything good that has happened, or to blame the Council for every bad thing that happened. Many fruitful discussions have been sidetracked that way. We are living in the world in which the Council did happen.

I don’t live in Europe, but even the less bad situation in the US terrifies me. I would never have predicted how heavily my relatives - 3rd generation from Ireland - would have been so deeply absorbed by the secular media.

What I see are small subgroups within the Church flourishing in the Faith. We have a diocesan Latin Mass community, but there are many other devout Catholics who only go to the OF Masses. Both groups overlap with prolifers, with homeschoolers, and with those who set up a new, traditional Catholic high school, and a new, traditional order of sisters, now in formation. We benefit enormously from a Catholic radio station, independent but compatible with the diocese, again with the same people as in the other groups.

But we are an intense minority with the shrinking, liberal Catholic community, which dominates most institutions. The home schoolers are almost the only ones having baptisms in some parishes. These subgroups are the hope for slowing dechristianization.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top