S
SusanneT
Guest
Definitely going down the way of ‘anything goes’ Anglicanism isn’t the way forward. Whereas I believe a return to traditionalism is.
Definitely. The problem is that the Bishops first need to admit that they screwed up by changing a successful formula. They copied the Anglicans but Catholics didn’t want to change. That’s why they left in the 70s. Stats don’t lie. Everybody was happy with the Latin, the devotions and the beautiful churches. The church flourished because we kept it real. If there’s any priests or bishops reading this then listen up: give the Catholics what they need, which is strong catehesis and decent worship.Whereas I believe a return to traditionalism is.
www.pewforum.org
It’s similar here in the UK. And when you do get the likes of politicians who are open about their Christian faith they can end up being forced out of their positions (such as ex-Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron) or branded as an extremist (such as Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg).Speaking as a german citizen:
Yes, secular culture is growing. Being religious is seen as unprofessional or old fashioned, If not silly in many, but not all environments.
Do not be afraid, do not be downcast.The Church - perfected in glory
769 "The Church . . . will receive its perfection only in the glory of heaven,"179 at the time of Christ’s glorious return. Until that day, "the Church progresses on her pilgrimage amidst this world’s persecutions and God’s consolations."180 Here below she knows that she is in exile far from the Lord, and longs for the full coming of the Kingdom, when she will "be united in glory with her king."181 The Church, and through her the world, will not be perfected in glory without great trials. Only then will "all the just from the time of Adam, ‘from Abel, the just one, to the last of the elect,’ . . . be gathered together in the universal Church in the Father’s presence."182
III. THE MYSTERY OF THE CHURCH
770 The Church is in history, but at the same time she transcends it. It is only "with the eyes of faith"183 that one can see her in her visible reality and at the same time in her spiritual reality as bearer of divine life.
This is definitely true. I’ve been called eccentric because I attend Mass. Christians are regarded as suspect. They only tolerate us because of political correctness but scratch the surface and the anti-Catholic bias comes tumbling out.As a Christian in the UK, I think you are generally regarded as a bit nutty. I think you are tolerated as long as you are seen as a ‘liberal’ Christian who accepts the secular line on gay marriage, contraception, abortion and the likes.
That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.Maybe that’s why John XXIII felt called to initiate an ecumenical council. Maybe Vatican II actually prevented something worse from happening.
Look at the wider society. They’re totally lost. I mean things are crazy! The Catholic community are part of this wider society. Loads of Catholics left the Church and embraced the world. Maybe it would’ve been worse without Vatican II and John Paul II. I’ve blamed Vatican II for EVERYTHING that happened in the last 50 years. But now I think it might have been worse without Vatican II. Don’t forget that the paedophile priest crisis began before the Council and the liturgy began changing before the Council. So maybe the Council put the brakes on by trying to combat things. Just a thought.That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.
Yup. And that number is increasing steadily. We have more and more married priests in the Church every year.Quite a few Anglican Priests became Catholic Priests and now some parishes have married priests. The Anglican priests have the Ordinariate .
We have to avoid two temptations here: to credit the Council with everything good that has happened, or to blame the Council for every bad thing that happened. Many fruitful discussions have been sidetracked that way. We are living in the world in which the Council did happen.Saxum:![]()
That is an interesting perspective, I’d never looked at it like that.Maybe that’s why John XXIII felt called to initiate an ecumenical council. Maybe Vatican II actually prevented something worse from happening.