T
Tom_Baum
Guest
It probably does sound “like a linguistic house of cards” but when I “met” God the Father, I realized that what I was taught in second grade, which was “God Is Love”, was/is quite literal.Sounds like a linguistic house of cards: constructing a sentence from words to create something we can’t actually wrap our mind around.
Besides, if we could, the seeming inconsistencies we normally encounter (things done by a loving God that don’t “seem” like loving acts to us) probably wouldn’t drive us to apoplexy.![]()
As far as, “to create something we can’t actually wrap our mind around”, I, personally, think that there are things about God that are beyond what our puny, little finite minds are able to grasp, as in figuring out, even thou many seem to think that they have figured out absolutely everything about God.
I believe that one of these is that absolutely no one can comprehend or conceive of a Being being Love,
I didn’t understand how God could be Love when I was taught that in second grade and I still do not understand how God can be a Being of Love even tho this has been revealed to me.
One of the things that I will say about “knowing” that Love Is God’s Very Being as opposed to love being a mere attribute of God is that it changes how I “look” at things and “think” about things.