T
tonyrey
Guest
According to Darwinism we are merely products of random mutations which differ from other animals for no reason or purpose whatsoever. Why should we have rights that they are not supposed to possess? It is simply prejudice in favour of our own species** if** we all exist by chance.In that case what is the **rational **
Then how do you explain the blood-stained history of the human race with its countless atrocities?By ‘law of the jungle’ I’m assuming you mean something akin to Social Darwinism or a society based on selfishness, which as any sociologist would tell would be extremely illogical as humans are a very empathic and social species.
Do lions care for another lion’s cubs when they kill them?I don’t understand why something being of nature means that one must act savage or barbaric, even wolves and chimps have been observed to care for one another when injured, and contrary to popular belief when a baby bird falls from the nest the first time and tries to fly the mother does NOT just let the chick fail, she catches them.
In other words morality is reduced to expediency. Empathy and compassion soon disappear when it becomes a struggle for survival…Because empathy and compassion are LOGICAL and they are highly advantageous evolutionary traits.