A
Apollos
Guest
Yeah whatever you wanna play that game fine byeFirst of all, there was no consensus in the first three centuries of Christianity as regards…
Yeah whatever you wanna play that game fine byeFirst of all, there was no consensus in the first three centuries of Christianity as regards…
I think we are blowing past each other but agree on some level here.Body, spirit and soul are separate from each other when sin is involved. We are dead to God when we sin, not nessasarily physical death. God’s intent in His creation didn’t want sin to separate the soul by a man’s way of sinning. So, many times the bible does speak of the soul/spirit as individual and separate when God first created perfection before and after sin drove a wedge. At physical death, the spirit leaves the body, not the soul. Jesus proved this on the cross," into your hands I commend my spirit". His Body left behind, His spirit went to the Father. At resurrection time of Jesus, He became a soul again.I think that the scriptures which I quoted relate that there is a distinct difference between the body and the soul. There is a distinct difference between the body and the spirit. There is a distinct difference between the soul and spirit.
“Indeed, the word of God is living and effective, sharper than any two-edged sword, penetrating even between soul and spirit, joints and marrow, and able to discern reflections and thoughts of the heart.”
Hebrews 4:12.
"Thou will not leave my soul in Sheol, neither will you allow your holy one to see corruption."
Acts 2:27,31
This makes you a Protestant.…Finally, if the Catholic church denies that God has a soul, then of course, I will believe the holy word of God over the teaching of the Catholic church.
No, only by your definition. I am not a member of a Protestant denomination. By the defiintion of sacred scriptures, I am a member of the household of God, the universal body of Christ. That is, **if **I am not only a hearer of God’s word, but also a doer of God’s word.This makes you a Protestant.
You are arrogating to yourself the authority that Christ gave to the teaching authority of the Church, so in effect you are a Protestant. You are a member of a denomination which consists of a single person - yourself.No, only by your definition. I am not a member of a Protestant denomination. By the defiintion of sacred scriptures, I am a member of the household of God, the universal body of Christ…
These are the convictions that God has put on my soul. No Catholic is required to believe them. Tell me how they upset the clear message of the saving gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, and then I will shut up.You are arrogating to yourself the authority that Christ gave to the teaching authority of the Church, so in effect you are a Protestant. You are a member of a denomination which consists of a single person - yourself.
How do you KNOW that these convictions were placed by God? How do you know a prejudice from Divine Truth? Catholics know because the Church is infallible, but they themselves, individually know they are sinners and capable of erring.These are the convictions that God has put on my soul. No Catholic is required to believe them. Tell me how they upset the clear message of the saving gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, and then I will shut up.
Well, it is written, "we know in part, and we prophesy in part’. I think this is true for myself and for the Catholic church, especially when the Word of God and the early church fathers do not give us a clear understanding on this question.How do you KNOW that these convictions were placed by God? How do you know a prejudice from Divine Truth? Catholics know because the Church is infallible, but they themselves, individually know they are sinners and capable of erring.
Evangelicals and Protestants on the other hand do not believe in an infallible Church, but rather arrogate that infallibility to themselves, as they all claim to be guided by the Holy Spirit, in spite of the fact that they all disagree with one another.![]()
We Christians are touchy about our theology, especially the nature of God. Especially-especially challenges that come from convictions that God has supposedly put on someone’s soul. Regardless of whether they are proposed as optional or mandatory beliefs.These are the convictions that God has put on my soul. No Catholic is required to believe them. Tell me how they upset the clear message of the saving gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, and then I will shut up.
It is one thing to challenge the teaching of sacred scripture and the early church fathers, it is another matter when it comes to the theology of the Son of God.We Christians are touchy about our theology, especially the nature of God. Especially-especially challenges that come from convictions that God has supposedly put on someone’s soul. Regardless of whether they are proposed as optional or mandatory beliefs.
If you knew anything about our history you would understand.
The Church is very humble. Humility has to do with truth. And is filled with wisdom.If the ‘church’ had a little bit more humility, and a little bit more wisdom, it would not have anathemized half the church for holding to semi-arian views on the theology of the Son of God.
I will make it brief. When the fire of God’s Spirit entered my soul, I was taught the scriptures. One of the things **that really bothered me **at the time,what I was taught regarding the theology of the Son of God is not as taught by most of Christianity today. You will never know how much I prayed to God not to be deceived nor to deceive anyone in this matter.
I understand it was a powerful experience…but in so far as the errors that crept into it at least–such is not the way of God…he honestly does not inspire someone in a way that is contrary to himself…to the teachings of his Church. And no matter how much one prays…it does not guarantee to “protect him from error”–rather such is a gift given by God to the Church…
Just being straight forward here…
Years later, I learned about the Ante-Nicene writings,and realized that my understanding was not singular, but this theology of the Son of God was expressed by the early church fathers.
actually you will find them instead pointing you to the Church and the faith of the Church
So, I do not know if it is the Spirit of God, or the spirit of the saints and martyrs that went before me. They need to be defended, I do know that much.
they would be the first to point you to what the Catholic Church teaches…and urge you not to be going off on your own here…
(I’ll just let that one stand on its own.)If the ‘church’ had a little bit more humility, and a little bit more wisdom, it would not have anathemized half the church for holding to semi-arian views on the theology of the Son of God.
How can the Catholic Church only have the Eucharist and yet not have correct teaching? Maybe the fault lies not in the church teaching but in your understanding. Fortunately, you are not required to understand everything the church teaches. You just have to accept that the Church teachings are true.I am in a state of limbo. I have enquired with my parish priest on some of these issues, and asked if it was wrong for me to receive the Eucharist. He did not respond. I do not know what to do. Only the catholic church has the holy Eucharist, I do not know what else to do.
The Pope asked forgiveness for the sins of Christians not “of the Church”…How much different is what I said, than what Pope John Paul II said when he asked God’s forgiveness for the past sins of the Church?
sacredheart.edu/pages/12654_pope_john_paul_ii_asks_for_forgiveness_march_12_2000_.cfm