W
WannabeSaint
Guest
Does infused knowledge have to be confirmed through acquired knowledge?
There are people who are absolutely convinced of “truths” of things even though, in reality, they are wrong.
Could a kid, out of the blue, without ever researching American history, KNOW that George Washington was black…only to find out if he looked at a history book, he would be sorely mistaken?
Basically does infused knowledge automatically mean correct knowledge? Wouldn’t it still have to be put to the test by experimental knowledge?
There are people who are absolutely convinced of “truths” of things even though, in reality, they are wrong.
Could a kid, out of the blue, without ever researching American history, KNOW that George Washington was black…only to find out if he looked at a history book, he would be sorely mistaken?
Basically does infused knowledge automatically mean correct knowledge? Wouldn’t it still have to be put to the test by experimental knowledge?