Does infused knowledge have to be confirmed through acquired knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeSaint
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Philosophic epistemology but foreshadows knowledge as being and Truth as Person…
And Life Eternal as Knowing the One True God…
All well beyond anthrophic correspondence of subject and object…
And endlessness of existence…
Satan has Knowledge of God…
Understanding supersedes Knowledge
Wisdom supersedes Understanding
Inheriting Eternal Life is Obeying God’s Command to Love One Another

_
 
Last edited:
40.png
Vico:
For example wisdom, science, intuition, art, prudence, which are intellectual virtues. Virtue may be intellectual, moral, and theological.
I disagree…

The potential is there for - via Faith and/or Reason - to develop them…

wisdom? Fear of the Lord is the beginning of Wisdom

science? what’s that? Homo Sap’s desire to Know Everthing…

art? what’s that? drawing stick figures on a wall for the actual purpose of teaching hunting?

_
That is a list of intellectual virtues, nothing there states that they can only be had through infusion. So what do you disagree with? Did you read the quoted source that provides the answers to your questions?
 
40.png
Vico:
Infused means filled.
So for Adam and Christ we have the teaching that
they were filled with knowledge.
Have you ever been infused with knowledge?

geo
I cannot prove to anyone what was miraculously conferred by God to me, if it was. I have had what could be called mystical experiences.
 
Why this fascination with the fact that you can’t remember the first few years of your life or the moment you may have learned every specific concept?
@Wesrock

Because St. Thomas says “There is nothing in the intellect that wasn’t first in the senses.”

There are audio stimuli (words) in my intellect that I’m not fully sure where they originated. If somehow these were infused into me and are not memories I gained from sense experience…Then St. Thomas’s assertion would fall flat…and open up the possibility of Cartesian skepticism of the sense (which is NOT a road I want to go down.)
 
Last edited:
That is a list of intellectual virtues, nothing there states that they can only be had through infusion. So what do you disagree with? Did you read the quoted source that provides the answers to your questions?
My connection with God… is mostly via FAITH in JEsus - and the Guidance via God’s Spirit…

Theological terms ?

Even (and Only) from the Magisterium - ?
serve … when involved in apologetics with those who need it.

God has imprinted His laws upon Hearts…

And the Mind of Jesus in Sacred Scriptures

It requires FAITH to see.

Yet even That alone is meaningless unless we not only accept what we hear - but do them -

Especially the Bottom Line - of Obeying God’s Command to Love One Another…

Wisdom?

**
  1. If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you. But when you ask, you must believe and not doubt, because the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That person should not expect to receive anything from the Lord.
  2. Such a person is double-minded and unstable in all they do.
**
 
Last edited:
Isn’t “infused knowledge” a Catholic term? It’s in our dictionaries…

That it is an unasked for and not-to-be-sought gift/charism of some saints private revelations? Which are not required learning even after they’ve been investigated and approved. Too, they come from God and are merely a means of guiding a soul to Him. At least that’s my understanding.
 
The knowledge that we have as Christians regarding supernatural truths will be confirmed-in the next life. Faith is a balancing act between knowledge given and our personal acceptance of it.
 
Last edited:
I read the following. In Jesus…infused knowledge (which was connatural)was when he told the Samaritan woman what he did about her life.
He had “ no way” to know.It was true. And the woman realized it was true and that He had “ no way” to know.
He was Jesus…but this gives an idea of what infused knowledge is.

I think…that some acquired knowledge of some sort has to confirm it. In this case the woman does.
Otherwise , we cannot say it is “ knowledge” of any kind.
It may be we are making it up, or guessing, or imagining, not real “ knowledge”
 
Last edited:
John 17:3 -
And this is Life Eternal,
that they should be knowing You
the only True God,
and Jesus Christ,
Whom You have sent.


Satan doubtless has some kind of knowledge of God…
But He is not KNOWING the One True God and His Son…
Understanding supersedes Knowledge
How do you experientially differentiate them?

My dad always used to say: :“I don’t understand all I know about this!”
Wisdom supersedes Understanding
OK… Meaning it is a consequence? Or has greater value?

eg Moving from Understanding to Wisdom entails what?
Inheriting Eternal Life is Obeying God’s Command to Love One Another
That is why I referenced John 17:3 above - eg Means OF attainment vs the Attainment itself…

geo
 
Last edited:
Have you ever been infused with knowledge?

geo
I suspected as much, my friend…

Closet mystics are good to find!
St. Thomas says “There is nothing in the intellect that wasn’t first in the senses.”
Demons visit and inhabit both senses and intellect…

I wonder which ‘intellect’ St. Thomas meant here… The nous? Or the intellectually discerning thinking faculty of man?
Mystical experiences are not the same as infused knowledge.
How do they differ?
Isn’t “infused knowledge” a Catholic term?
I thought so too - A Scholastic term… I have not seen it in Orthodoxy…

geo
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top