Y
YoungTradCath
Guest
No, but some people would think so.No.
I thought they were only used for latin Masses? Maybe not.
No, but some people would think so.No.
I thought they were only used for latin Masses? Maybe not.
That’s interesting; In the EF Tridentine Mass if Altar servers (boys) are present I always thought the hand-held communion paten was used with of course COTT.No, but some people would think so.
You can still kneel if you please and no one can do anything about it.I’m going to date myself. I was an alter server when the communion rails were done away with and the choice of recieving in hand came about. Shortly after the choice of how to receive communion came the pattens were retired. Only place I remember seeing them used now is at the latin Mass. I kind of miss not kneeling to receive our lord. Never thought about it until attending the latin Mass. Didn’t understand much but felt better kneeling for communion.
Uh, okay?That’s interesting; In the EF Tridentine Mass if Altar servers (boys) are present I always thought the hand-held communion paten was used with of course COTT.
I can only remember being to one parish that used them and even then it was only the main aisle that had them…Jiminy, I voted yes and was surprised to see that there are more nos than yeses! I haven’t been to THAT many churches, but I think I can only remember one church that I’ve been to that didn’t use patens.
I would think you’d WANT communion patens…
Well. If I become the priest of a parish that doesn’t use patens, I’ll change it so that they do.![]()
Then what’s the point? That’s the problem: people think things like these are for show.I can only remember being to one parish that used them and even then it was only the main aisle that had them…
???At my RCC, never. At my ECC, always.
I misunderstand the word “paten”. We call the small plate that the priest gives commun ion from, the paten. These we use at daily Masses for their are from 5 to 9 that attend so the paten(small plate) is sufficient. We did have a larger plate for the weekend Masses but we have since acquired two communion bowls and these are a blessing. Because of their shape the Eucharist is protected. What you are calling “paten” no, we have not used a paten in the 30 years I have been in the parish.You are probably correct in regard to your small parish but my parish is much bigger and 99% of the people go to communion. We have lay ministers of communion who perform their ministries in a reverent orderly fashion. It’s not so much about how much time it takes (but that is a factor for most people) it’s about doing so reverently. The priest would feel overwhelmed and rushed if he were distributing alone…not to mention that most people in my parish communicate from the Cup as well. As I stated before…this is a wonderful result of Vatican II that so many people go to communion.
First of all I’ve seen communion bowls used before though not in my parish; they’re regarded as types of ciborium’s or ciboria which don’t entail the use of patens.I misunderstand the word “paten”. We call the small plate that the priest gives commun ion from, the paten. These we use at daily Masses for their are from 5 to 9 that attend so the paten(small plate) is sufficient. We did have a larger plate for the weekend Masses but we have since acquired two communion bowls and these are a blessing. Because of their shape the Eucharist is protected. What you are calling “paten” no, we have not used a paten in the 30 years I have been in the parish.
It sounds like the parish/diocese should change their supplier of altar-breads. There should not be so many particles. The altar-breads should be made with sealed edges.As a server at EF Mass on Sundays, I have seen many particles of Our Lord’s Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity fall on the paten. They are most definitely not just for show.
The Church I went to doesn’t. They just handed the Eucharist straight out from the Chalice.Mine does not, which I find unfortunate. Redemptionis Sacramentum seems to require it when saying, “[93.] The Communion-plate for the Communion of the faithful should be retained, so as to avoid the danger of the sacred host or some fragment of it falling.” But in the same paragraph, there is a footnote pointing to GIRM 118, which says, “Likewise should be prepared: … c) on the credence table: … if appropriate, the paten.”
Therefore I cannot decide whether or not the Communion paten is required in the OF.
ve been attending for the past 3+ years uses one......but its TLM only, Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter.Wow.The church ive been attending for the past 3+ years uses one......but its TLM only, Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter.
The former PP of the local parish re-introduced the paten; but the current one tossed it because he claimed its use was an insult to the laity!!!
Nothing about disrespect towards our Lord!![]()
I think I could complain but I think the point has been made already.The church ive been attending for the past 3+ years uses one......but its TLM only, Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter.
The former PP of the local parish re-introduced the paten; but the current one tossed it because he claimed its use was an insult to the laity!!!
Nothing about disrespect towards our Lord!![]()
Wow.
This thread has surprised me: sadly, in this country (Australia), the number of OF priests who make use of the paten seems to be virtually zero.I think I could complain but I think the point has been made already.![]()
But that’s just like a lazy husband saying “Just let the wife take care of it”.This thread has surprised me: sadly, in this country (Australia), the number of OF priests who make use of the paten seems to be virtually zero.
There`s a stupid saying about the risk of fallen Host particles: “Let the angels take care of it.”!!!![]()