Donald Trump attacks Hillary Clinton as wins set stage for brutal election

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Obama is both a great man and great Christian. Osama Bin Laden attacked innocent Christians and Muslims. God will be the judge when it comes to Bin Laden. Obama is a great Christian for working for healthcare for all Americans. Its the Christian way to help injured/sick people out.
And God will be the judge of Obama shooting the man in the head and throwing him off the boat like garbage? I hope he doesn’t work on everyone else’s health care like this and call it what, the christian way. Maybe he could get on the mic about Calif and speak to the protesters about …Love Your Neighbor. Maybe he could start with a few smaller venues to practice. He’s been a little rough on foreign policy. Its not one of his better points as we see.
 
If Hillary Clinton had not married Bill Clinton she would be probating wills in Arkansas . The only real accomplishment Hillary Clinton has ever had is marrying Bill Clinton/QUOTE
Notice how those who so ardently champion her successes’ refuse to respond tol this basic question?:cool:
 
Democrats need Whites to be seen as racist
So far what I am getting out of this is Obama is terrible with foreign policy and unifying the US population and decided to call only the whites who don’t like him racist and sexist, and for his grand finale and the queens promoted entry. Oh, and wage war with the white police regardless if they are democrat or rep, you have to wonder why any police are democrats today.

The christian way according to his disciples.
 
I don’t think that anyone who supports Born Alive legislation like Obama has done upholds the kinds of values that most saintly people would find admirable.

Saintly Democratic Catholic may be an exception to this general rule though.
 
Likely the same people who did not vote for Obama did not vote for Bill Clinton either, and will refrain from voting for Hillary Clinton for the same reason.

The one thing that these three all have in common is not race of sex. It has a lot to do with people who are conservative or Republican tend not to vote for Democrats.
So iow you’re saying every Democratic President will be vilified to the extent Obama has been.
 
The only vilified are those who don’t bow to Obama

Aside from racist and sexist they are worse than radical Islamic terrorists according to Obama.
Obama’s exact words: “If you look at the number of Americans killed since 9/11 by terrorism, it’s less than 100. If you look at the number that have been killed by gun violence, it’s in the tens of thousands.”
Basically he is saying the assimilated americans are worse than radical islamic terrorists.

Course the criminals who we all wish he would do something about he’s terribly silent about. We could just go get the guns off the streets from the criminals and start this week before a cop is shot in Calif or a misguided child is shot by a cop.

Its quite clear if you don’t follow Obama your the enemy and all is fair with him in regards.

Obama thinks Rep are worse than terrorists of Islam. Riot is quite acceptable to Obama and civil unrest is not discouraged at all.

All this is long before Trump came along and is Obamas agenda so blaming others for Obamas failures really has no merit. The quote above is last year and that as is all his divisiveness is quite old news. Riots and Obama go hand in hand. You’ll have to do better than its Trumps fault.
 
So iow you’re saying every Democratic President will be vilified to the extent Obama has been.
Villified?!!

Any Republican president will be vilified to a much greater extent than Obama has ever been.

The vilification of Obama has been nothing compared to the vilification of GWB. That is just the way the system is structured.

In terms of Democratic presidents, Bill Clinton was much more vilified by Republicans than Obama ever has been.
 
I’m not at all sure what your saying? Killing Bin Laden makes Obama a great christian? :confused:

Maybe the next time with a Bin Laden, as a great christian he could bring him back “alive” and not throw the body off a boat like a bag of garbage, bring him back “alive” so as civil humans we could actually talk.

Correction: he wasn’t thrown off like a bag of garbage - he was given a most suitable finale, and he was not a civil human.
 
Opposes, you mean.

🙂
That is right. I was remembering it as Obama supporting legislation that would protect doctors from any possibility of persecution for maltreatment of ‘abortions’ born alive.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Stanek

For most people, the whole idea is barbaric, stripping the personhood of babies even when they are breathing.

For Obama and the Catholics here who support him, this is what a good Christian does.
 

Correction: he wasn’t thrown off like a bag of garbage - he was given a most suitable finale, and he was not a civil human.
Christ would have died for him if he had been the only person in the world. Christ still loved him even though he did not love his actions. Therefore, to honor Christ, it behooves us to at least honor bin Laden’s personhood and give him the funeral his faith prescribed. No one has to agree with him or canonize him. I certainly didn’t agree with his methods or ideology, but I do keep in mind that he was a child of God. Maybe he was just a victim of life’s cruel circumstances. We don’t know. We can’t judge. Not after the fact.
 
From what I remember, the force sent to take in( or take out) Osama would have captured him if it was safe to do so.

It was a little weird that the corpse was dumped at sea, but not all that big of a deal. Of all the things that Obama has ordered in his role of POTUS, Americans in general are pleased enough that Osama was taken down, and give Obama his due credit for the role he had played in bringing that about.

Other than that, Obama’s policy has never been one of America first. He came into office seeing America as the root of much of the unrest in the world, and structured his foreign policy accordingly. His policy was to place the world first, and act in the interest of the world, regardless of what might benefit America the most.

In terms of actual involvement, there will be very little difference between the mechanics of a Trump foreign policy, and that of the last eight years of Obama. The difference is that Trump will chose isolationism out of a bloated nationalism and a belief that the rest of the world does not deserve American beneficence. Obama chose isolationism because of his belief that the world needs to be relieved of American maleficence.

That gives an ironic meaning to the axiom that the more things change, the more things remain the same, doesn’t it?
 
From what I remember, the force sent to take in( or take out) Osama would have captured him if it was safe to do so.

It was a little weird that the corpse was dumped at sea, but not all that big of a deal. Of all the things that Obama has ordered in his role of POTUS, Americans in general are pleased enough that Osama was taken down, and give Obama his due credit for the role he had played in bringing that about.

Other than that, Obama’s policy has never been one of America first. He came into office seeing America as the root of much of the unrest in the world, and structured his foreign policy accordingly. His policy was to place the world first, and act in the interest of the world, regardless of what might benefit America the most.

In terms of actual involvement, there will be very little difference between the mechanics of a Trump foreign policy, and that of the last eight years of Obama. The difference is that Trump will chose isolationism out of a bloated nationalism and a belief that the rest of the world does not deserve American beneficence. Obama chose isolationism because of his belief that the world needs to be relieved of American maleficence.

That gives an ironic meaning to the axiom that the more things change, the more things remain the same, doesn’t it?
Yes, it does, and I believe whoever is elected, not much will change at all. I agree with you.
 
Yes, it does, and I believe whoever is elected, not much will change at all. I agree with you.
Maybe, maybe not. Sometimes external forces intervene, such as another major terrorist attack here in the U.S., G-d forbid, which test the judgment and temperament of a President. Other times, loss of an influential person occurs through retirement or death, such as the death of a Supreme Court justice, who must be replaced. The future is unpredictable and a President, as well as a Vice-President, must be prepared.
 
There are some very serious issues that Hillary is acutely vulnerable on.

Setting the Middle East on fire is certainly one of them, for example.
The mideast is a total disaster as a result of the policies supported by Hillary. The American invasion of Iraq destroyed state institutions and exacerbated distrust between Shiias and Sunnis, thereby creating an environment favorable for the implantation and expansion of ISIS.
 
It was a little weird that the corpse was dumped at sea
Whats a little weird is claiming great christian and this in the next breath as proof.

Vatican’s statement: “Osama bin Laden, as we all know, bore the most serious responsibility for spreading divisions and hatred among populations, causing the deaths of innumerable people, and manipulating religions for this purpose. In the face of a man’s death, a Christian never rejoices, but reflects on the serious responsibilities of each person before God and before men, and hopes and works so that every event may be the occasion for the further growth of peace and not of hatred.”
 
Trump has problems with women, but have you seen the polls regarding Clinton’s favourability ratings with women? She’s got her own problems.
I’m a woman that has no respect for Hillary and would never vote for her. And she is playing the so called womens card with the women’s reproductive rights mantra.

I wonder If she cares how many women’s lives were ruined by abortion, and how many baby girls were killed.

Some women may not like Trump, but that doesn’t mean they’ll vote for her.
 
Whats a little weird is claiming great christian and this in the next breath as proof.

Vatican’s statement: “Osama bin Laden, as we all know, bore the most serious responsibility for spreading divisions and hatred among populations, causing the deaths of innumerable people, and manipulating religions for this purpose. In the face of a man’s death, a Christian never rejoices, but reflects on the serious responsibilities of each person before God and before men, and hopes and works so that every event may be the occasion for the further growth of peace and not of hatred.”
While I don’t believe that killing Bin Laden is proof of being a Christian, killing him doesn’t bother me. As someone who doesn’t believe in capital punishment, this does cause me some problems. People who are concerned about Gitmo prisoners being brought onshore should really freak out about what would have happened if Bin Laden was brought to American shores or even Gitmo.

If Bush had killed Bin Laden would you be complaining?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top